Synonyms

Mode 2 knowledge production; Post-normal science

Introduction

The term “transdisciplinarity (TD)” was coined to denote a search for the “unity” of knowledge or – more generally – the actual means with which such an integration of otherwise disciplinary fragmented knowledge can be achieved. Since its first appearance, “transdisciplinarity,” in fact, stands for nothing less than “the contemporary version of the historical quest for systematic integration of knowledge” (Klein 2010, p. 24; cf. Klein 1990, pp. 63–73).

Just like interdisciplinarity, the basic objective of TD has been from its beginning to make science and higher education more responsive to the complexity of life-world problems and more relevant for the public good and the legitimate needs of the society. Since then TD has been seen as a means to help research organizations to become active agents of societal innovations. The ambitious goal has been to make their knowledge more effective by overcoming the increasing...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,100.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnold M. Interdisziplinarität: Theorie und Praxis eines Forschungskonzepts. In: Arnold M, editor. iff – Interdisziplinäre Wissenschaft im Wandel. Wien-Münster: Peter Lang; 2009. p. 65–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold M, Dressel G. iff – Geschichte einer interdisziplinären Institution. In: Arnold M, editor. iff – Interdisziplinäre Wissenschaft im Wandel. Wien-Münster: Peter Lang; 2009. p. 17–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blok A. Experts on public trial: on democratizing expertise through a Danish consensus conference. Public Underst Sci. 2007;16(2):163–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogner A, Kastenhofer K, Torgersen H, editors. Inter- und Transdisziplinarität im Wandel? Neue Perspektiven auf problemorientierte Forschung und Politikberatung. Baden-Baden: Nomos; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs A, et al., editors. Interdisciplinarity. Problems of teaching and research in Universities. Paris: OECD; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • CERI. The University and the Community. The problems of changing relationships. Paris: OECD; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J. The public and its problems. Athens: Ohio University Press; 1927/1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezrahi Y. The descent of icarus: Science and the transformation of contemporary democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezrahi Y. Technology and the Illusion of the Escape from Politics. In: Ezrahi Y et al., editors. Technology, pessimism and postmodernism. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1994. p. 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR. Science for the post-normal age. Futures. 1993;25(7):735–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzmann S, Scott P, Trow M. The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanschitz R-C, Schmidt E, Schwarz G. Transdisziplinarität in Forschung und Praxis. Chancen und Risiken partizipativer Prozesse. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hippel von E. The sources of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hippel von E. Democratizing innovation. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch Hadorn G, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U, Zemp E, editors. Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Berlin: Springer; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch Hadorn G, Pohl C, Bammer G. Solving problems through transdisciplinary research. In: Frodemann R et al., editors. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 431–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger J, Scheringer M. Transdisziplinarität: problemorientierung ohne Methodenzwang. GAIA. 1998;7(1):10–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch E. Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation. In: Briggs A et al., editors. Interdisciplinarity. Problems of teaching and research in universities. Paris: OECD; 1972. p. 97–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch E. Interdisciplinarity: dreams and reality. Prospects. 1980;10(3):304–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y, editor. Transdisciplinarity: stimulating synergies, integrating knowledge. Paris: UNESCO (Division of Philosophy and Ethics); 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein JT. Interdisciplinarity: history, theory, and practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein JT. Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures. 2004;36:515–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein JT. A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In: Frodemann R et al., editors. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kockelmans JJ. Why interdisciplinarity? In: Kockelmans JJ, editor. Interdisciplinarity and higher education. University Park/London: The Pennsylvania State University Press; 1979. p. 123–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence RJ. Housing and health: from interdisciplinary principles to transdisciplinary research and practice. Futures. 2004;36:487–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichnerowicz A. Mathematic and interdisciplinarity. In: Briggs A et al., editors. Interdisciplinarity. Problems of teaching and research in Universities, Paris: OECD; 1972. pp. 121–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieven O, Maasen S. Transdisziplinäre Forschung. Vorbote eines ‚New Deal‘ zwischen Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft? GAIA. 2007;16(1):35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller RC. Varieties of interdisciplinary approaches in the social sciences. Issues Integr Stud. 1982;1:1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstraß J. Wohin geht die Wissenschaft? Über Disziplinarität, Transdisziplinarität und das Wissen in einer Leibniz-Welt. In: Mittelstraß J, Der Flug der Eule. Von der Vernunft der Wissenschaft und der Aufgabe der Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1989. p. 60–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstraß J. Transdisciplinarity – new structures in science. In: Innovative structures in basic research (Ringberg-symposium October 4–7, 2000). Munich: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft; 2002. pp. 43–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J. The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships. In Briggs A et al., editors. Interdisciplinarity, Problems of teaching and research in Universities, Paris: OECD; 1972. pp. 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl C, Hirsch Hadorn G. Principles for designing transdisciplinary research. Proposed by the swiss academies of arts and sciences. Munich: Oekom; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russel AW, Wickson F, Carew AL. Transdisciplinarity: context, contradictions and capacity. Futures. 2008;40:460–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JC. Seeing like a state. How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven/London: Yale University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh R. Differenzierung der Wissenschaft. Zeitschrift für Soziologie. 1979;8:82–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E. Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Arnold .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Arnold, M. (2013). Transdisciplinary Research (Transdisciplinarity). In: Carayannis, E.G. (eds) Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_337

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_337

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3857-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3858-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation