Abstract
The pioneers of the scientific revolution claimed that the develo** system of knowledge they envisioned would be distinguished by its practical usefulness. Galileo Galilei, Francis Bacon, and René Descartes agreed that the newly conceived endeavor of unveiling nature’s secrets by means of uncovering its lawful regularities would engender practical progress, too. The novel and revolutionary idea was that knowledge of the causes and the laws of nature would pave the way toward technological innovation. As Bacon claimed, inventions bring about supreme benefit to humankind, and this aim is best served by investigating the processes underlying the operations of nature. Knowledge about nature’s workings makes it possible to take advantage of its forces [1, I.§129]. In the same vein, Descartes conceived of technology as an application of this novel type of knowledge. The speculative and superficial claims that had made up the erudition of the past had remained barren and had failed to bear practical fruit. The principles of Descartes’ own approach, by contrast, promised to afford
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
F. Bacon: Neues Organon I-II (1620); Latin–German translation and edition by W. Krohn (Meiner, Hamburg 1999).
R. Descartes: Discours de la méthode (1637); German translation and edition by L. Gäbe (Meiner, Hamburg 1960).
I. Hacking: Representing and Intervening. Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1983).
V. Bush: Science The Endless Frontier. A Report to the President (United States Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. 1945); online: http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htm
R. Hohlfeld: Strategien gegen Krebs – Die Planung der Krebsforschung, in W. van den Daele, W. Krohn & P. Weingart (eds.): Geplante Forschung. Vergleichende Studien ber den Einfluβ politischer Programme auf die Wissenschaftsentwicklung (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt 1979), p. 181.
P. Galison: Einstein’s Clocks, Poincaré’s Maps. Empires of Time (W.W. Norton, New York 2003).
N. Cartwright: Fundamentalism versus the Patchwork of Laws, in D. Papineau (ed.): The Philosophy of Science (Oxford University Press, Oxford 1996), p. 314.
T. Wilholt: Design Rules: Industrial Research and Epistemic Merit, forthcoming (2005).
J. Ziman: The Continuing Need for Disinterested Research, Science and Engineering Ethics 8, 397 (2002).
S.S. Schweber: Physics, Community and the Crisis in Physical Theory, Physics Today, November 1993, p. 34.
A. Einstein: Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper, Ann. Physik 17, 891 (1905); reprinted in [29, pp. 26–50].
H.A. Lorentz: Simplified Theory of Electrical and Optical Phenomena in Moving Systems, in [16], p. 255, reprinted from 1899.
P. Drude: The Theory of Optics (Dover, New York 1959), translated from Lehrbuch der Optik (S. Hirzel, Leipzig 1900).
H. Poincaré: La mécanique nouvelle, in É. Guillaume (ed.): La Mécanique Nouvelle (Gauthier-Villars, Paris 1927), 1–17. Reprint from (1909).
R. McCormmach: Einstein, Lorentz, and the Electron Theory, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 2, 41 (1970).
K. Schaffner: Nineteenth–Century Aether Theories (Pergamon Press, Oxford 1972).
M. Carrier: Shifting Symbolic Structures and Changing Theories: On the Non- Translatability and Empirical Comparability of Incommensurable Theories, in ,M. Ferrari & I. Stamatescu (eds.): Symbol and Physical Knowledge. On the Conceptual Structure of Physics (Springer, Berlin 2001), pp. 125–148.
M. Carrier: Semantic Incommensurability and Empirical Comparability: The Case of Lorentz and Einstein, Philosophia Scientiae 8, 73 (2004).
H.A. Lorentz: Electromagnetic phenomena in a system moving with any velocity less than that of light, Proc. Acad. Science Amsterdam IV, 669 (1904); reprinted in [29].
K. Schaffner: Einstein versus Lorentz: Research Programmes and the Logic of Comparative Theory Evaluation, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25, 45 (1974).
H. Poincaré: La mesure du temps, Revue de métaphysique et de morale 6, 1 (1898).
H. Poincaré: La théorie de Lorentz et le principe de réaction, in Œuvres de Henri Poincaré IX (Gauthier-Villars, Paris 1954), pp. 464–488.
H. Poincaré: La Valeur de la Science (Flammarion, Paris 1905).
A.I. Miller: Albert Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity. Emergence (1905) and Early Interpretation (1905–1911) (Addison–Wesley, Reading Mass. 1981).
H. Reichenbach: The Philosophy of Space and Time (Dover Publications, New York 1958); translated from Philosophie der Raum–Zeit–Lehre (W. de Gruyter, Berlin 1928).
J. Messerli: Gleichmässig, pünktlich, schnell. Zeiteinteilung und Zeitgebrauch in der Schweiz im 19. Jahrhundert (Chronos, Zürich 1995).
M. Carrier: The Completeness of Scientific Theories. On the Derivation of Empirical Indicators within a Theoretical Framework: The Case of Physical Geometry, Western Ontario Series in the Philosophy of Science 53 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1994).
W. Heisenberg: Die Physikalische Prinzipien der Quantentheorie (B.I. Wissenschaftsverlag, Mannheim 1958); English translation: The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory (Dover Publications, New York 1949).
H.A. Lorentz, A. Einstein & H. Minkowski: Das Relativitätsprinzip. Eine Sammlung von Abhandlungen (Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt 1923).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carrier, M. (2006). The Challenge of Practice: Einstein, Technological Development and Conceptual Innovation. In: Ehlers, J., Lämmerzahl, C. (eds) Special Relativity. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 702. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34523-X_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34523-X_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34522-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34523-7
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)