A More Expressive Softgoal Conceptualization for Quality Requirements Analysis

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Modeling - ER 2006 (ER 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4215))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Initial software quality requirements tend to be imprecise, subjective, idealistic, and context-specific. An extended characterization of the common Softgoal concept is proposed for representing and reasoning about such requirements during the early stages of the requirements engineering process. The types of information often implicitly contained in a Softgoal instance are highlighted to allow richer requirements to be obtained. On the basis of the revisited conceptual foundations, guidelines are suggested as to the techniques that need to be present in requirements modeling approaches that aim to employ the given Softgoal conceptualization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 85.59
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Naeem, T., Gorton, I., Ali Babar, M., Rabhi, F., Benatallah, B.: A Quality-Driven Systematic Approach for Architecting Distributed Software Applications. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Softw. Eng. pp. 244–253 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alves, C., French, X., Carvallo, J.P., Finkelstein, A.: Using Goals and Quality Models to Support the Matching Analysis During COTS Selection. In: Franch, X., Port, D. (eds.) ICCBSS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3412, pp. 146–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Anton, A., Earp, J., Reese, A.: Analyzing Website Privacy Requirements Using a Privacy Goal Taxonomy. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Req. Eng. pp. 23–31 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Avesani, P., Bazzanella, C., Perini, A., Susi, A.: Facing Scalability Issues in Requirements Prioritization with Machine Learning Techniques. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Req. Eng. pp. 297–305 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boehm, B.W., Brown, J.W., Kaspar, H., Lipow, M., MacLeod, G.J., Merritt, M.J.: Characteristics of Software Quality. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Castro, J., Kolp, M., Mylopoulos, J.: Towards requirements-driven information systems engineering: the Tropos project. Info. Syst. 27(6), 365–389 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chesnevar, C.I., Maguitman, A.G., Loui, R.P.: Logical Models of Argument. ACM Comput. Surv. 32(4), 337–383 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung, L., Nixon, B., Yu, E., Mylopoulos, J.: Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering. Kluwer Publishing, Dordrecht (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Cleland-Huang, J., Settimi, R., BenKhadra, O., Berezhanskaya, E., Christina, S.: Goal-Centric Traceability for Managing Non-Functional Requirements. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Softw. Eng. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dardenne, A., van Lamsweerde, A., Fickas, S.: Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Sci. of Comput. Prog. 20, 3–50 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Donzelli, P.: A goal-driven and agent-based requirements engineering framework. Req. Eng. 9, 16–39 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ISO: Int. Standard ISO 8402. Quality – Vocabulary. Int. Org. for Standardization, Geneva (1986) (and later)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Issarny, V., Bidan, C., Saridakis, T.: Achieving Middleware Customization in a Configuration-based Development Environment: Experience with the Aster Prototype. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Config. Distrib. Syst. pp. 207–214 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jackson, D.: Structuring Z Specifications with Views. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Method 4(4), 365–389 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New York (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kreps, D.: Notes on the Theory of Choice. Westview Press, Boulder (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Landes, D., Studer, R.: The Treatment of Non-Functional Requirements in MIKE. In: Proc. Europ. Softw. Eng. Conf. (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lee, J., Kuo, J.-Y.: New Approach to Requirements Trade-Off Analysis for Complex Systems. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 10(4), 551–562 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Letier, E., van Lamsweerde, A.: Reasoning about Partial Goal Satisfaction for Requirements and Design Engineering. In: Proc. ACM SIGSOFT Symp. Found. of Softw. Eng. pp. 53–62 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, X.F., Yen, J.: An Analytic Framework for Specifying and Analyzing Imprecise Requirements. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Softw. Eng. pp. 60–69 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, L., Yu, E.: Designing information systems in social context: a goal and scenario modeling approach. Info. Syst. 29, 187–203 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mylopoulos, J., Chung, L., Nixon, B.: Representing and Using Nonfunctional Requirements: A Process-Oriented Approach. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 18(6) (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Noppen, J., van der Broek, P., Aksit, M.: Dealing with Imprecise Quality Factors in Software Design. In: Proc. Worksh. Softw. Qual. pp. 1–6 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nuseibeh, B., Finkelstein, A., Kramer, J.: Fine-Grain Process Modelling. In: Proc. Int. Worksh. Softw. Spec. Des., December 1993, pp. 42–46 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nuseibeh, B., Kramer, J., Finkelstein, A.: A Framework for Expressing the Relationships Between Multiple Views in Requirements Specifications. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 20(10), 760–773 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Osterweil, L.: Strategic Directions in Software Quality. ACM Comput. Surv. 28(4), 738–750 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosa, N.S., Justo, G.R.R., Cunha, P.R.F.: A Framework for Building Non-Functional Software Architectures. In: Proc. ACM Symp. Appl. Comput. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Simon, A.H.: The Sciences of the Artificial, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  29. van Lamsweerde, A.: Divergent Views in Goal-Driven Requirements Engineering. In: Proc. ACM SIGSOFT Worksh. Viewpoints Softw. Dev. pp. 252–256 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  30. van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering: A Guided Tour. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Req. Eng. pp. 249–263 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yen, J., Tiao, W.A.: A Systematic Tradeoff Analysis for Conflicting Imprecise Requirements. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Req. Eng. pp. 87–96 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yu, E.: Modelling Strategic Relationships for Process Reengineering. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Toronto (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control 8, 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Zave, P., Jackson, M.: Four Dark Corners of Requirements Engineering. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Meth. 6(1), 1–30 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jureta, I.J., Faulkner, S., Schobbens, PY. (2006). A More Expressive Softgoal Conceptualization for Quality Requirements Analysis. In: Embley, D.W., Olivé, A., Ram, S. (eds) Conceptual Modeling - ER 2006. ER 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4215. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11901181_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11901181_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-47224-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47227-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation