THE QND MODEL/GAME SYSTEM: INTEGRATING QUESTIONS AND DECISIONS FOR MULTIPLE STRESSORS

  • Conference paper
Ecotoxicology, Ecological Risk Assessment and Multiple Stressors

Part of the book series: NATO Security Through Science Series ((NASTC,volume 6))

  • 1010 Accesses

Abstract

Complex environmental challenges include elements of social and cultural viewpoints as well as the often-explored technical viewpoint. The Questions and Decisions TM (QnDTM) screening model system was created to provide an effective and efficient tool to integrate ecosystem, management, economic and socio-political factors into a user-friendly model/game framework. The model framework is utilized in a larger process of stakeholder participation in order to generate questions and decisions for the management of complex environmental challenges. The model is written in object-oriented Java and can be deployed as a stand-alone program or as a web-based (browser-accessed) applet. The QnD model links spatial components within geographic information system (GIS) files to the abiotic (climatic) and biotic interactions that exist in an environmental system. QnD can be constructed with any combination of detailed technical data or estimated interactions of the ecological/management/social/economic forces influencing an ecosystem. The model development is iterative and can be initiated quickly through conversations with users or stakeholders. Model alterations and/or more detailed processes can be added throughout the model development process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 245.03
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 320.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 320.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ( http://mepas.pnl.gov/FRAMESV1/weapv3.pdf)(last accessed Feb 15 2005).

  2. ( http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol4/iss2/art1/. )(Last accessed Feb 15 2005).

  3. Barber, M.C. 2001. Bioaccumulation and Aquatic System Simulator (BASS) User's Manual Beta Test Version 2.1. EPA Report No. 600/R-01/035. http://www.epa.gov/AthensR/staff/members/barbermahlonc/bass21_manual.pdf.

  4. Best, E.P.H., Fredrickson, H.L., MacFarland, V.A., Hintelmann, H., Jones, R.P., Lutz, C.H., Kiker, G.A., Bednar, A.J., Millward, R.N., Price, R.A., Lotufo, G.R., Ray, G.L., 2004. Pre-construction Biogeochemical Analysis of Mercury in Wetlands bordering the Hamilton Army Airfield (HAAF) Wetlands Restoration Site. Interim Report 2004 to USACE District, San Francisco, by USACE Engineer Research and Development Center, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, November, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carpenter, S., Brock, W. & Hanson, P. (1999). “Ecological and social dynamics in simple models of ecosystem management.” Conservation Ecology 3(2): 4 [online]. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol3/iss2/art4/ )(Last accessed Feb 15 2005).

  6. 6.Checkland, P. 1999. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Delta Tributaries Mercury Council and the Sacramento River Watershed Program (2002). “Final Strategic Plan for the Reduction of Mercury-Related Risk in the Sacramento River Watershed: Appendices 1 and 4.” (http://www.sacriver.org/subcommittees/dtmc/documents.html).

  8. Dortch, M. S. , Gerald, J. A. , Toney, T., Gelston, G.M., Kirk, J.L. and Fant, S.A. 2004. Example of an Aquatic Ecological Assessment Based on a User-defined Water Concentration and User-defined Dose-Duration Data within WEAP (Example No. 3). (http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/arams )(last accessed Feb 15 2005).

  9. Dortch, M. S., 2001. Army Risk Assessment Modeling System (ARAMS). Published in Assessment and Management of Environmental Risks: Cost -efficient methods and applications, edited by Igor Linkov and Jose Palma-Oliveira. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dortch, M.S., and Gerald, J.A. 2004. Recent advances in the Army Risk Assessment Modeling System, in Brownfields, Multimedia Modeling and Assessment, G. Whelan, Edt., WIT Press, Southampton, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gerald, J.A., and Dortch, M.S. 2004. Predicting range UXO source quantity and its impact on future training, in Brownfields, Multimedia Modeling and Assessment, G. Whelan, Edt., WIT Press, Southampton, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gunderson, L.H. and Holling, C.S. 2002. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Island Press. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S. and Light, S.S. 1995. Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. Columbia University Press. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hudson, R. J. M., Gherini, S. A., Watras, C. J., and Porcella, D. B. (1994). “Modeling the Biogeochemical Cycle of Mercury in Lakes: The Mercury Cycling Model (MCM) and its Application to the MTL Study Lakes.” In Mercury Pollution: integration and synthesis, C. J. Watras and J. W. Huckabee, eds., Lewis Publishers, 473-523.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jeppesen, E. I. and Iversen, T.M. 1987. “Two simple models for estimating daily mean water temperatures and diel variations in a Danish low gradient stream.” Oikos 49: 149-155.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kiker, G.A., Rivers-Moore, N., Kiker M.K., and Linkov, I. 2005. QnD: A modeling game system for integrating environmental processes and practical management decisions.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mason, R. P., Reinfelder, J. R., and Morel, F. M. M. (1996). “Uptake, toxicity, and trophic transfer of mercury in a Coast diatom.” Environmental Science and Technology, 30(6), 1835-1845.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Matsinos, Y. G., DeAngelis, D.L. and Wolff, W.F. (1994). “Using an object-oriented model for an ecological risk assessment on a great blue heron colony.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling 20(8): 75-82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Midwest Ecological Risk Assessment Center (MERAC), 1999. What is Ecological Risk Assessment? http://www.merac.umn.edu/whatisera/default.htm. (Last accessed Feb 15 2005).

  20. Miller, A. 1999. Environmental Problem Solving: Psychosocial Barriers to Adaptive Change. Springer-Verlag. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rittel, H. and M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences. Vol.4: 155-169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rogers, D.W. (1994). “You Are What You Eat and a Little Bit More: Bioenergetics-Based Models of MethylMercury Accumulation in Fish Revisited.” In: Mercury Pollution: integration and synthesis, C. J. Watras and J. W. Huckabee, eds., Lewis Publishers, 473-523.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Starfield, A. M., Cumming, D.H.M., Taylor, R.D. and Quadling, M.S. (1993). “A framebased paradigm for dynamic ecosystem models.” AI Applications 7(2): 1-13.

    Google Scholar 

  24. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) 1997, Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Process for Designing and Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments, Interim Final, EPA 540-R-97-006. http://www.epa.gov/oerrpage/superfund/programs/risk/ecorisk/ecorisk.html.

  25. Walters, C., Korman, J., Stevens, L.E. & Gold, B. (2000). “Ecosystem modeling for evaluation of adaptive management policies in the Grand Canyon.” Ecology and Society 4(2): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Whelan, G., Pelton, M.A., Taira, R.Y. ,Rutz, F. and Gelston, G.M. 2000. Demonstration of the Wildlife Ecological Assessment Program (WEAP). Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Report PNNL-13395. Richland, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yoe, C. 2002. Tradeoff Analysis Planning and Procedures Guidebook. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute of Water Resources Report Management Consultants, Ltd. Contract # DACW72-00-D-0001. http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/iwr/pdf/tradeoff.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

KIKER, G.A., LINKOV, I. (2006). THE QND MODEL/GAME SYSTEM: INTEGRATING QUESTIONS AND DECISIONS FOR MULTIPLE STRESSORS. In: Arapis, G., Goncharova, N., Baveye, P. (eds) Ecotoxicology, Ecological Risk Assessment and Multiple Stressors. NATO Security Through Science Series, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4476-3_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation