Abstract
A number of papers have recently contrasted classical inference estimation methods for logit models with Bayesian methods. It has been argued that two particularly appealing features of the Bayesian approach are its relative simplicity in estimation, and its ability to derive, individual-specific willingness to pay (WTP) measures that are less problematic than the classical approaches in terms of extreme values and unexpected signs. This paper challenges this claim by deriving both population derived WTP measures and individual-specific values based on the classical mixed logit model, establishing the extent of unacceptable valuations. Our aim is not to estimate Bayesian contrasts per se but to show that the classical inference approach is likewise straightforward — indeed the individual-specific estimates are a by-product of the parameter estimation process. We also reveal the benefits of calculating WTP measures from ratios of individual parameters which are behaviourally more appealing approximations to the true values of each individual, in contrast to draws from population distributions that run the risk of allocating two parameters that are poorly juxtaposed in a relative sense, resulting in extreme value estimates. Our results suggest that while extreme values and unexpected signs cannot be ruled out (nor can they in the Bayesian framework), the overall superiority of the Bayesian method appears overstated. Both approaches have merit.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Greene, W.H., Hensher, D.A., Rose, J.M. (2005). Using Classical Simulation-Based Estimators to Estimate Individual WTP Values. In: Scarpa, R., Alberini, A. (eds) Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics. The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3684-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3684-1_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3683-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3684-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)