Perspectives and Future Directions

  • Chapter
Urban Raptors
  • 775 Accesses

Abstract

Urbanization is both a landscape process and a demographic process. Most people are familiar with the changes on the landscape that have occurred on both local and global scales, and virtually all of us have experience with the profound changes in the neighborhoods, towns, and cities where we have lived. Such large-scale urbanization has occurred in all developed and most develo** nations. In addition to these widespread landscape changes, demographic changes to the world’s human population have reached the point where now more than half of the 7.3 billion people on the planet are urban dwellers.1 This trend toward urbanization is projected to continue, with increasingly fewer people living and working in rural environments. Along with these changes to our demographic profile come different experiences, attitudes, and opinions about how we view our place in nature.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  1. United Nations. 2015. “World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables.” Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.241.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Freyfogle, E. T. 2017. Our Oldest Task: Making Sense of Our Place in Nature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Soule, M. E. 1990. “The Onslaught of Alien Species, and Other Challenges in the Coming Decades.” Conservation Biology 4:233–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rotherham, I. D. 2017. Recombinant Ecology—A Hybrid Future? New York: Springer International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. DeStefano, S., and D. M. DeGraaf. 2003. “Exploring the Ecology of Suburban Wildlife.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1:95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moss, W. E., M. W. Alldredge, and J. N. Pauli. 2016. “Quantifying Risk and Resource Use for a Large Carnivore in an Expanding Urban—Wildland Interface.” Journal of Applied Ecology 53:371–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weckel, M., and A. Wincorn. 2016. “Urban Conservation: The Northeastern Coyote as a Flagship Species.” Landscape and Urban Planning 150:10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mannan, R. W., and C. W. Boal. 2004. “Birds of Prey in Urban Landscapes.” In People and Predators, edited by N. Fascione, A. Delach, and M. E. Smith, 105–17. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hager, S. B. 2009. “Human-Related Threats to Urban Raptors.” Journal of Raptor Research 43:210–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Andersen, D. E., and D. L. Plumpton. 2000. “Urban Landscapes and Raptors: A Review of Factors Affecting Population Ecology.” In Raptors at Risk: Proceedings of the V World Conference on Birds of Prey and Owls, edited by R. D. Chancellor and B.-U. Meyburg, 434–45. Berlin, Germany: World Working Group on Birds of Prey and Owls; Surrey, BC: Hancock House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Steidl, R. J., and B. F. Powell. 2006. “Assessing the Effects of Human Activities on Wildlife.” George Wright Forum 23:50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carrete, M., and J. L. Tella. 2011. “Inter-Individual Variability in Fear of Humans and Relative Brain Size of the Species Are Related to Contemporary Urban Invasion in Birds.” PLoS ONE 6: e18859.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramalho, C. E., and R. J. Hobbs. “Time for a Change: Dynamic Urban Ecology.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 27:179–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. NASA. 2017. “Global Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet.” https://climate.nasa.gov.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hassell, J. M., M. Begon, M. J. Ward, and E. M. Fèvre. 2017. “Urbanization and Disease Emergence: Dynamics at the Wildlife-Livestock-Human Interface.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 32:55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Young, H. S., I. M. Parker, G. S. Gilbert, A. S. Guerra, and C. L. Nunn. 2017. “Introduced Species, Disease Ecology, and Biodiversity-Disease Relationships.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 32:41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. DeStefano, S., and R. D. Deblinger. 2005. “Wildlife as Valuable Natural Resources vs. Intolerable Pests: A Suburban Wildlife Management Model.” Urban Ecosystems 8:179–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller, J. E., B. C. Tefft, R. E. Eriksen, and M. Gregonis. 2000. “Turkey Damage Survey: A Wildlife Success Story Becoming Another Wildlife Damage Problem.” Proceedings of the Wildlife Damage Management Conference 9:24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kane, B., P. S. Warren, and S. B. Lerman. 2015. “A Broad Scale Analysis of Tree Risk, Mitigation and Potential Habitat for Cavity-Nesting Birds.” Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 14:1137–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank our many colleagues and the discussions that have influenced our thoughts and perspectives on the intersection of wildlife and urban settings. We thank David Andersen and Todd Fuller for their reviews of this manuscript and their constructive comments. We are especially appreciative for the photographs donated by Katelyn Bird, Doris Evans, Kim Domina, Helen Riedel, and Brian Rusnica.

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Cheryl R. Dykstra

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

DeStefano, S., Boal, C.W. (2018). Perspectives and Future Directions. In: Boal, C.W., Dykstra, C.R. (eds) Urban Raptors. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-841-1_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation