Urban Raptor Case Studies: Lessons from Texas

  • Chapter
Urban Raptors

Abstract

The presence of raptors in cities brings up many questions for wildlife managers and agencies and raises some fundamental questions about how to respond to emerging demands for limited wildlife conservation budgets. According to population estimates, a major demographic shift in the world’s human population occurred in May 2007 when we, as a species, became more urban than rural.1 This rural to urban shift happened in the United States around the late 1910s.1 In Texas, this shift occurred in the 1940s.2 As of the time of this writing, the US Census Bureau estimates that more than 80 percent of the US population lives in urban areas. However, the vast urban population of the United States resides on just 3 percent of the land area.3 This juxtaposition serves as the foundation for one of the most critical issues being debated today in state wildlife agencies regarding the future of wildlife conservation. Where and how should we allocate our limited wildlife conservation resources? Similarly, how are state wildlife agencies to remain relevant to the vast urban public given that 97 percent of the land is rural?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  1. North Carolina State University. 2007. “Mayday 23: World Population Becomes More Urban than Rural.” ScienceDaily. Accessed December 12, 2016. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070525000642.htm.

  2. United States Census Bureau. 1995. “Urban and Rural Population: 1900 to 1990.” US Census Bureau. Accessed February 14, 2017. http://www.census.gov/population/censusdata/urpop0090.txt.

    Google Scholar 

  3. United States Census Bureau. 2015. “New Census Data Show Differences between Urban and Rural Populations.” US Census Bureau American Community Survey. Accessed December 12, 2016. http://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2016/cb16-210.html.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 2016. “The Future of America’s Fish and Wildlife: A 21st Century Vision for Investing in and Connecting People to Nature.” Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. Accessed March 24, 2017. http://www.fishwildlife.org/files/Blue_Ribbon_Panel_Report2.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Adams, C. E., K. J. Lindsey, and S. J. Ash. 2006. Urban Wildlife Management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. USDA. 2016. “Managing Vulture Damage.” US Department of Agriculture Wildlife Services. Accessed February 15, 2017. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/publications/wildlife_damage/content/printable_version/fs_vulture_damage_man.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Avery, M. L., J. S. Humphrey, E. A. Tillman, K. O. Phares, and J. E. Hatcher. 2002. “Dispersing Vulture Roosts on Communication Towers.” Journal of Raptor Research 36:45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Seamans, T. W. 2004. “Response of Roosting Turkey Vultures to a Vulture Effigy.” Ohio Journal of Science 104:136–38.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ball, S. A. 2009. “From the Field: Suspending Vulture Effigies from Roosts to Reduce Bird Strikes.” Human-Wildlife Conflicts 3:257–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank urban wildlife biologists Diana Foss, Tony Henehan, Kelly Norrid, Richard Heilbrun, and Sam Keischnick for providing details of the accounts from their respective cities covered in this chapter. I also thank Michelle Haggerty for providing information regarding the Texas Master Naturalist Program. Finally, I thank the editors Clint Boal and Cheryl Dykstra for valuable assistance in develo** this chapter.

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Cheryl R. Dykstra

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davis, J.M. (2018). Urban Raptor Case Studies: Lessons from Texas. In: Boal, C.W., Dykstra, C.R. (eds) Urban Raptors. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-841-1_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation