Abstract
Corporate social responsibility is a somewhat elusive concept. It corresponds to a number of different local contexts and a variety of organizational structures. The resulting vagueness and diversity of definitions of CSR has been the object of several studies (Aguilera and Jackson, 2003; Louche and Lydenberg, 2006; Matten and Moon, 2008), but is also an issue for the major interested parties in CSR, usually called stakeholders, as opposed to shareholders. CSR is also linked to the financial sector through Socially Responsible Investment (SRI), another concept with a range of meanings, from adding ethical criteria to investment motivations to searching for a new kind of social or environmental performance. Use of the term ‘socially responsible’must therefore reach beyond the positive aura surrounding this type of initiative in order to understand how practices are defined, and their potentially complex implications for the actors involved. The ‘green’aspect of sustainable development is frequently foregrounded to the detriment of its social dimension. CSR is most easily explained in environmental terms, and its social aspects tend to escape the attention of journalists and the general public. There is a need for certain actors to show that it is not solely an environmental matter, and that it affects them as much as other stakeholders who have greater media visibility in topics concerning the future of the planet. Finance is one of these actors, and it has chosen the angle of SRI performance (Allouche and Laroche, 2005; Gond, 2001) to increase its legitimacy on this subject. But this financial focus on SRI was not a foregone conclusion; it is the result of discreet regulation by the financial sector in a context that could have been influenced by several types of actor.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguilera, R. V. and G. Jackson (2003) ‘The Cross-National Diversity of Corporate Governance: Dimensions and Determinants’, Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 447–66.
Allouche, J., I. Huault and G. Schmidt (2004) ‘Responsabilité sociale des entreprises: la mesure détournée?’ XVème Congrès de l’AGRH.
Allouche, J. and P. Laroche (2005) ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance: A Survey’, in J. Allouche (ed.) Corporate Social Responsibility. Performances and Stakeholders (London: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 3–40.
Brunel, S. (2004) Le Développement Durable (Paris: PUF).
Campbell, J. L. (2006) ‘Institutional Analysis and the Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility’, American Behavioural Scientist, 49(7): 925–38.
Capron, M. and F. Quairel-Lanoizelée (2007) La responsabilité sociale des entreprises (Paris: La Découverte).
Déjean, F. (2010) ‘L’Emergence de l’ISR en France: le Rôle des Syndicats’, Economies et Sociétés, 1(K): 1827–46.
Déjean, F., J-P. Gond and B. Leca (2004) ‘Measuring the Unmeasured: An Institutional Entrepreneur’s Strategy in an Emerging Industry’, Human Relations, 57(6): 741–64.
Gond, J-P. (2001) ‘l’Ethique est-elle profitable?’, Revue Française de gestion, 136(November-December): 72–86.
Gond, J-P. and B. Leca (2004) ‘La construction de la notation sociale des entreprises, ou l’histoire d’ARESE’, Sciences de la Société, 62(May): 188–207.
Holm, P. (1995) ‘The Dynamics of Institutionalization: Transformation Processes in Norwegian Fisheries’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3): 398–422.
Karpik, L. (1996) ‘Dispositif de confiance et engagements crédibles’, Sociologie du travail, 4(38): 527–50.
Karpik, L. (2007) L’économie des singularités (Paris: Gallimard).
Lazega, E. and L. Mounier (2002) ‘Interdependent Entrepreneurs and the Social Discipline of their Cooperation: A Research Programme for Structural Economic Sociology in a Society of Organizations’, in O. Favereau and E. Lazega (eds) Conventions and Structures in Economic Organization: Markets, Networks, and Organizations (Cambridge: Edward Elgar Publishing), pp. 147–99.
Lechevalier, A. (2001) ‘Réforme de l’épargne salariale, avenir du salariat et dynamique du capitalisme patrimonial’, Mouvements, 13(1): 93–100.
Louche, C. and S. Lydenberg (2006) ‘Investissement Socialement Responsable: Différences entre Europe et Etats-Unis’, Revue d’Economie Financière, 85(September): 81–105.
Maguire, S., C. Hardy and T. B. Lawrence (2004) ‘Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada’, Academy of Management Journal, 47(5): 657–79.
Matten, D. and J. Moon (2008) ‘“Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Academy of Management Review, 33(2): 404–24.
Rémond, A. (2009) ‘Responsabilité sociale des entreprises et capitalisme financier: pourquoi la régulation fait défaut’, Revue Française de socio-économie, 2(4): 155–75.
Reynaud, J-D. (1989) Les règles du jeu: l’action collective et la régulation sociale (Paris: Armand Colin).
White, H. (2002) Markets from Networks (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Zucker, L. (1987) ‘Institutional theories of organization’, Annual Review of Sociology, 13(August): 443–64.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2012 Elise Penalva-Icher
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Penalva-Icher, E. (2012). How Finance Regulates Trade Union Involvement in French SRI. In: Huault, I., Richard, C. (eds) Finance: The Discreet Regulator. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137033604_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137033604_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34725-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-03360-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)