• 80 Accesses

Abstract

Throughout World War II, US policy toward Korea was based on a trusteeship plan among the Allies. Instead of extending an early recognition to the Korean nationalists, Washington planned a trusteeship because it remained doubtful about the Koreans’ ability for self-governance. It also believed that the four-power trusteeship could mitigate the great power rivalry over postwar Korea. This approach was maintained by the Roosevelt administration until it reached the secret Far-Eastern agreement with the Russians at Yalta in February 1945.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Jung Byeong-jun, Unam Yiseungman Yeongu [A Study of Rhee] (Seoul: Yeoksa Bipyeongsa, 2005), 91–94, 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nagata Akifumi, Nihonno Chosentochito Kokusaikankei (Tokyo: Heibonsha, 2005), 153–56, 381.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hyeondae Hangukhak-yeonguso, ed., Unam Munseo [Rhee Papers] (Seoul: Gukhakjaryowon, 1998), VI, 441–44;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ko Jeong-hyu, Yiseungmangwa Hangukdokripwundong [Rhee and Korean Independence Movement] (Seoul: Yonsei University Press, 2004), 428.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Paul C. McGrath, “United States Army in the Korean Conflict,” Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army, Unpublished Manuscript, US Army Center of Military History, Washington, D.C., 28; The US Army, 8th, History of the United States Armed Forces in Korea (HUSAFIK), ed. Dolbegae (Seoul, 1988), II, pt 2, 47–48;

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chong-Sik Lee, The Politics of Korean Nationalism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1963), 129–233.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Roosevelt to Welles, April 8, 1942, enclosing Soong’s memorandum, Department of State, FRUS: 1942, I, 866–69; Rhee to Hull, February 16, 1943, DS Records, 895.01/214, Box 5929, RG 59, NA. See also, Oliver, Syngman Rhee: The Man behind the Myth (New York: Dodd Mead and Company, 1954), 188.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cordell Hull, The Memoirs of Cordell Hull, II (New York: Macmillan, 1948), 1595–96.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F.D.R. to Cordell Hull, October 17, 1944, Elliott Roosevelt ed., F.D.R. His Personal Letters (New York, Duell, Sloan and Pearce, 1950), II, 1546–47.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elliott Roosevelt, As He Saw It (New York: Duell, Slaon and Pearce, 1945), 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  11. The Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt, compiled by Samuel I. Rosenman (New York: Random House, 1945), 139, 296, 373.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., 9; Foreign Policy Studies Branch (Division of Historical Policy Research, Office of Public Affairs) Department of State, United States Policy Regarding Korea 1834–1941 (May 1947), 37–39.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cordell Hull, The Memoirs of Cordell Hull (New York: Macmillan Co., 1948), II, 1596;

    Google Scholar 

  14. Anthony Eden, The Reckoning (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1965), 438;

    Google Scholar 

  15. Welles memorandum, March 29, 1943, FRUS:1943, China, 845–46.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Warren I. Cohen, America’s Response to China (New York: Columbia University Press, 2000), 133.

    Google Scholar 

  17. John Paton Davies Jr., November 7, 1944, Department of State, United States Relations with China, with Special Reference to the Period 1944–1949 (Washington, DC, 1949), 566–67. Hereafter noted as The China White Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  18. David Memorandum, “American Chinese Relations During the Next Six Months” November 15, 1944, FRUS: 1944, VI, 695–97.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hurley to FDR, November 16, 1944, Map Room Paper, Box 11, FDR Library; Russel Buhite, Patrick J. Hurley and American Foreign Policy (Ithaca: NY Cornell University Press, 1973), 184.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See the personal account by Hugh Borton, “Preparation for the Occupation of Japan,” The Journal of Asian Studies 25, 2 (February 1966): 203–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. John Paton Davies Jr., Dragon by the Tail: American, British, Japanese, and Russian Encounters With China and One Another (New York: Norton, 1972), 390.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Robert Dallek, Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932–1945 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1979), 503;

    Google Scholar 

  23. John Lewis Gaddis, Russia, the Soviet Union, and the United States: An Interpretive History (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1978), 167.

    Google Scholar 

  24. For the sources of FDR’s optimistic character, see Doris K. Goodwin, “Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1933–1945,” Character Above All, ed. Robert A. Wilson (New York, N.Y.: Touchstone, 1995), 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Roosevelt to Churchill, R-624. September 28, 1944, Warren F. Kimball, ed., Churchill and Roosevelt: The Complete Correspondence (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1984), III, 339.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See also, Gaddis, Russia, Soviet Union, and the United States (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978), 167–68.

    Google Scholar 

  27. For Roosevelt’s diplomatic style, see William D. Leahy, I Was There (New York: Whittlesey House, 1950), 4–5;

    Google Scholar 

  28. Henry Stimson and McGeorge Bundy, On Ac tive Service in Peace and War (London: Hutchinson & Co., 1949), 317, 321–23.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Robert Dallek, Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932–1945 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), 519.

    Google Scholar 

  30. J.A.S. Grenville, A History of the World in the Twentieth Century, II (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1997), 372.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Averell Harriman and Elie Avel, Special Envoy to Churchill and Stalin, 1941–1946 (New York: Random house, 1975), 398.

    Google Scholar 

  32. James F. Byrnes, Speaking Frankly (New York and London: Harper & Brothers, 1947), 23.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sherwood, Roosevelt and Hopkins: An Intimate History (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1948), 867.

    Google Scholar 

  34. For similar problems in FDR’s dealing with Poland, see, Frazer J. Harbutt, The Iron Curtain: Churchill, America, and the Origin of the Cold War (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1986), 69.

    Google Scholar 

  35. For FDR’s lack of preparation for the possibility of fall of cooperation among the Allies, see Frederick W. Marks III, Wind Over Sand: The Diplomacy of Franklin Roosevelt (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1988), 171, 173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Seung-young Kim

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kim, Sy. (2009). Vision of Cooperation among the Allies and the Four-power Trusteeship Plan for Korea. In: American Diplomacy and Strategy toward Korea and Northeast Asia, 1882–1950 and After. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230621688_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation