Abstract
Lukács’ long, difficult and incredibly rich essay, ‘Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat’, is one of the most influential essays of the twentieth century.1 Some of the more important influences stemming from this essay are: the recognition of a close connection between Hegel and Marx, the importance of dialectical thought in challenging dualistic, formalistic and isolating modes of thought, the importance of social location for develo** certain forms of consciousness or knowledge, the importance of attempting to develop mediations between theory and practice aimed at overthrowing capitalism, and an extended discussion of some of the reifying forces of capitalism including their impact on capitalist ideology. It is Lukács’ particular emphasis on the concept of reification that is perhaps most original to him (even considering the influence of Max Weber and Georg Simmel), and, in my view, is his greatest theoretical achievement. I say this for two reasons. First, a careful study of capital’s inner logic as presented by Marx in Capital and, as developed further by Japanese political economists Kozo Uno and Thomas Sekine, demonstrates that reification is an absolutely central characteristic of capital.2 Second, a theory of capital’s peculiar reifying force can contribute a great deal to thinking about the impact of capital on the formation of subjects both collective and singular, and about the possibilities of action in concert to bring about democratic socialism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes and References
Lukács, G., History and Class Consciousness (London: Merlin Press, 1971).
For an extended discussion of reification and its connection to capital’s unique ontology, see Albritton, R., Dialectics and Deconstruction in Political Economy (London: Macmillan, 1999).
See Fraser, N., ‘From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a “Poststructuralist Age”’, New Left Review, vol. 212 (1995); also Hennessy, R., Profit and Pleasure (New York: Routledge, 2000).
Uno, K., Principles of Political Economy: Theory of a Purely Capitalist Society, trans. T. Sekine, (Brighton: Harvester Press, 1980).
Sekine, T., An Outline of the Dialectic of Capital, 2 vols (London: Macmillan, 1997).
Sartre, J.-P., Search For a Method (New York: Vintage, 1968).
Mohanty, C., ‘Women Workers and Capitalist Scripts: Ideologies of Domination, Common Interests, and the Politics of Solidarity’ in M. J. Alexander and C. Mohanty (eds), Feminist Genealogies, Colonial Legacies, and Democratic Futures (New York: Routledge, 1997).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2003 Robert Albritton
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Albritton, R. (2003). Superseding Lukács: A Contribution to the Theory of Subjectivity. In: Albritton, R., Simoulidis, J. (eds) New Dialectics and Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230500914_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230500914_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43331-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50091-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)