SpringerLink
Log in

Measuring Recognition Vocabulary Size

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lexical Facility

  • 430 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter describes two approaches to measuring recognition vocabulary size, the Vocabulary Levels Test/Vocabulary Size Test approach and the Yes/No Test approach. The respective test formats and their uses are described. The formats are then compared as potential measures of lexical facility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akbarian, I. (2010). The relationship between vocabulary size and depth for ESP/EAP learners. System, 38(3), 391–401. doi:10.1016/j.system.2010.06.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavi, S. M. (2012). The role of vocabulary size in predicting performance on TOEFL reading item types. System, 40(3), 376–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, J. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency: The interface between learning and assessment. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardel, C., & Lindquist, C. (2011). Develo** a lexical profiler for spoken French L2 and Italian L2: The role of frequency, thematic vocabulary and cognates. EUROSLA Yearbook, 11, 75–93. doi:10.1075/eurosla.11.06bar.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeckmans, R., Eyckmans, J., Janssens, V., Dufranne, M., & Van de Velde, H. (2001). Examining the yes/no vocabulary test: Some methodological issues in theory and practice. Language Testing, 18(3), 235–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beglar, D. (2010). A Rasch-based validation of the vocabulary size test. Language Testing, 27(1), 101–118. doi:10.1177/0265532209340194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beglar, A., & Hunt, A. (1999). Revising and validating the 2000 word level and the university word level vocabulary tests. Language Testing, 16(2), 131–162. doi:10.1191/026553299666419728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundgaard-Nielsen, R. L., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2011). Vocabulary size was associated with second-language vowel perception performance in adult learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(3), 433–461. doi:10.1017/S0272263111000040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, L. (2002). Measuring vocabulary size in English as an additional language. Language Teaching Research, 6(2), 145–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. K., & Ishida, S. (2005). Vocabulary knowledge differences between placed and promoted students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(3), 225–238. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2004.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culligan, B. (2015). A comparison of three test formats to assess word difficulty. Language Testing, 32(4), 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • East, M. (2004). Calculating the lexical frequency profile of written German texts. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgort, I. (2013). Effects of L1 definitions and cognate status of test items on the vocabulary size test. Language Testing, 30(2), 253–272. doi:10.1177/0265532212459028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, R. W., & Nguyen, L. T. C. (2015). The bilingual vocabulary size test for Vietnamese learners: Reliability and use in placement testing. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 25, 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, M. (2006). The lexical decision task as a measure of L2 lexical proficiency. EUROSLA Yearbook, 6(1), 147–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, M., & Carey, M. (2009). The online yes/no test as a placement tool. System, 37(4), 614–626. doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.09.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, M., & Roche, T. (2014). Identifying academically at-risk students at an English-medium university in Oman: Post-enrolment language assessment in an English-as-a-foreign language setting. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 15, 34–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsch, C., & Hartig, J. (2015). Comparing C-tests and yes/no vocabulary size tests as predictors of receptive language skills. Language Testing, 33(4), 555–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huibregtse, I., Admiraal, W., & Meara, P. (2002). Scores on a yes-no vocabulary test: Correction for guessing and response style. Language Testing, 19(3), 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanzaki, M. (2014). Comparing TOEIC® and vocabulary test scores. In G. Brooks, M. Grogan, & M. Porter (Eds.), 2014 PanSIG conference proceedings (pp. 52–58). Miyazaki: JALT

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanzaki, M. (2015). Comparing TOEIC® and vocabulary test scores. In G. Brooks, M. Grogan, & M. Porter (Eds.), 2014 PanSIG conference proceedings (pp. 52–58). Miyazaki: JALT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojic-Sabo, I., & Lightbown, P. M. (1999). Students’ approaches to vocabulary learning and their relationship to success. The Modern Language Journal, 83(2), 176–192. doi:10.1111/0026-7902.00014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, Y. (2010). Yes/No tests for foreign language placement at the post-secondary level. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquee, 13(2), 54–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, B. (1992). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In P. J. L. Arnaud & H. Béjoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 126–132). London: Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-12396-4_12.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, B. (2005a). Focus on form in second language vocabulary learning. EUROSLA Yearbook, 5(1), 223–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, B. (2005b). Lexical frequency profiles: From Monte Carlo to the real world. A response to Meara. Applied Linguistics, 26(4), 582–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, B., & Levitzky-Aviad, T. (2016). CATTS (Computer Adaptive Test of Size & Strength). Downloaded May 1, 2016, from http://www.lextutor.ca/tests/levels/recognition/nvlt/paper.pdf

  • Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (2001). Passive vocabulary size and speed of meaning recognition: Are they related? EUROSLA Yearbook, 1(1), 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmouh, Z. (2008). The relationship between grades and the lexical richness of student essays. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 7(3), 163–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, S., Hogg, N., & Kramer, B. (2014). Estimations of Japanese university learners’ English vocabulary sizes using the vocabulary size test. Vocabulary Learning and Instruction, 3(2), 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClean and Kramer. (2015). The creation of a new vocabulary levels test. In G. Brooks, M. Grogan, & M. Porter (Eds.), 2014 PanSIG conference proceedings (pp. 1–11). Miyazaki: JALT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meara, P., & Buxton, B. (1987). An alternative to multiple choice vocabulary tests. Language Testing, 4(2), 142–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meara, P., & Jones, G. (1988). Vocabulary size as placement indicator. In P. Grunwell (Ed.), Applied linguistics in society (pp. 80–87). London: CILT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meara, P., & Jones, G. (1990). Eurocentres vocabulary size test. 10KA. Zurich: Eurocentres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meara, P. M., & Milton, J. L. (2002). X_Lex: The Swansea vocabulary levels test. Newbury: Express.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meara, P. M., & Milton, J. (2003). X_Lex: The Swansea vocabulary levels test. Swansea: Lognostics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meara, P. M., & Miralpeix, I. (2006). Y_Lex: The Swansea advanced vocabulary levels test. v2.05. Swansea: Lognostics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, J. (2009). Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, J., & Alexiou, T. (2009). Vocabulary size and the common European framework of reference for languages. In B. Richards, M. H. Daller, D. D. Malvern, P. Meara, J. Milton, & J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Vocabulary studies in first and second language acquisition (pp. 194–211). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mochida, A., & Harrington, M. (2006). The yes-no test as a measure of receptive vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 26(1), 73–98. doi:10.1191/0265532206lt321oa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L., & Cobb, T. (2004). Vocabulary profiles as predictors of the academic performance of teaching English as a second language trainees. System, 32(1), 75–87. doi:10.1016/j.system.2003.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Rowley: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary was needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes, 63(1), 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, I. S. P. (2012). The vocabulary size test: Information and specifications. Retrieved from http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/publications/paul-nation/Vocabulary-Size-Test-information-and-specifications.pdf

  • Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, P., & Coxhead, A. (2014). Vocabulary size research at Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. Language Teaching, 47(03), 398–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Schmitt, S. (2012). Scoring yes-no vocabulary tests: Reaction time vs. nonword approaches. Language Testing, 29(4), 489–509. doi:10.1177/0265532212438053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read. (1988). Measuring the vocabulary knowledge of second language learners. RELC Journal, 19, 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roche, T., & Harrington, M. (2013). Recognition vocabulary knowledge as a predictor of academic performance. Language Testing in Asia, 3, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, T., Harrington, M., Sinha, Y., & Denman, C. (2016). Vocabulary recognition skill as a screening tool in English-as-a-Lingua-Franca University settings. In J. Read (Ed.), Post-admission language assessment of University students, English language education (Vol. 6, pp. 159–178). Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary. A vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Develo** and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55–89. doi:10.1191/026553201668475857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiotsu, T., & Read, J. (2009, November). Extending the yes/no test as a measure of the English vocabulary knowledge of Japanese learners. Paper presented at The measurement of L2 lexical development colloquium, Annual Conference of the Applied Linguistics Association of Australia, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stæhr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 139–152. doi:10.1080/09571730802389975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. (2014). Do multiple-choice options inflate estimates of vocabulary size on the VST? Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(3), 271–282. doi:10.1080/15434303.2014.922977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbe, R. (2015). Replacing translation tests with yes/no tests. Vocabulary Learning and Instruction, 4, 38–48. doi:10.7820/vli.vo4.2.stubbe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, S. (2007). The effect of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 28(1). doi:10.1093/applin/aml048.

  • Zhang, X., & Lu, X. (2013). A longitudinal study of receptive vocabulary breadth knowledge growth and fluency development. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 283–304. doi:10.1093/applin/amt014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Michael Harrington

Authors
  1. Michael Harrington
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harrington, M. (2018). Measuring Recognition Vocabulary Size. In: Lexical Facility. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37262-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37262-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-37261-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37262-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation