A Comparative Study of AdaBoost and K-Nearest Neighbor Regressors for the Prediction of Compressive Strength of Ultra-High Performance Concrete

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Developments in Structural Engineering, Volume 1 (SEC 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 52))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 107 Accesses

Abstract

One of the most promising materials for concrete buildings is ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC). Traditional UHPC compositions include significant amounts of cement, silica fume, superplasticizer, and other pricey and carbon-intensive ingredients. In order to develop a more cost-effective and environmentally friendly UHPC using alternative UHPC dosages that utilise locally accessible resources, it is necessary to study the relationships between the UHPC dosage and its resulting properties. This study employs two novel machine learning algorithms, the AdaBoost regressor and K-nearest neighbor, to illustrate the non-linear relationships between dose mixture design and the compressive strength of UHPC. A dataset comprising 810 UHPC mixture collections with 15 input variables, namely cement, slag, fly ash, silica fume, quartz powder, limestone powder, nano silica, water, coarse aggregate, fine aggregate, fibre, superplasticizer, relative humidity, temperature, and age has been used to train the models. After adjusting the regression model, the prediction performance of the two models is comprehensively compared using different performance parameters. The proposed AdaBoost regressor model achieved the most precise prediction during the testing phase, outperforming the K-nearest neighbor regressor, as evident from the statistical results and Taylor diagram. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) measure feature significance and variable influence on a prediction. The SHAP interpretations matched the typical compressive behaviour of concrete, confirming the typical relationship between machine learning predictions and actual events. The proposed AdaBoost model can be used as a high-performance tool to estimate the compressive strength of ultra-high performance concrete during the design and construction phases of civil engineering projects based on the experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wang D, Shi C, Wu Z, **ao J, Huang Z, Fang Z (2015) A review on ultra high performance concrete: part II. Hydration, microstructure and properties. Constr Build Mater 96:368–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yunsheng Z, Wei S, Sifeng L, Chujie J, Jianzhong L (2008) Preparation of C200 green reactive powder concrete and its static–dynamic behaviors. Cem Concr Compos 30(9):831–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu K-Q, Yu J-T, Dai J-G, Lu Z-D, Shah SP (2018) Development of ultra-high performance engineered cementitious composites using polyethylene (PE) fibers. Constr Build Mater 158:217–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Soliman NA, Tagnit-Hamou A (2017) Using glass sand as an alternative for quartz sand in UHPC. Constr Build Mater 145:243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghafari E, Bandarabadi M, Costa H, Júlio E (2015) Prediction of fresh and hardened state properties of UHPC: comparative study of statistical mixture design and an artificial neural network model. J Mater Civ Eng 27(11):4015017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rahman HAA, Wah YB, He H, Bulgiba A (2015) Comparisons of ADABOOST, KNN, SVM and logistic regression in classification of imbalanced dataset. Soft Comput Data Sci 2015:54–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Munir MJ, Kazmi SMS, Wu Y-F, Lin X, Ahmad MR (2022) Development of novel design strength model for sustainable concrete columns: a new machine learning-based approach. J Clean Prod 357:131988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mangalathu S, Jeon J-S (2019) Machine learning–based failure mode recognition of circular reinforced concrete bridge columns: comparative study. J Struct Eng 145(10):4019104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rahman J, Ahmed KS, Khan NI, Islam K, Mangalathu S (2021) Data-driven shear strength prediction of steel fiber reinforced concrete beams using machine learning approach. Eng Struct 233:111743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dzięcioł J, Sas W, Głuchowski A, Miturski M (2021) Perspective on the application of machine learning methods as a tool for estimating flow parameters in recycled concrete aggregate. Mach Learn Risk Assess Geoengin Wrocław Pol 25–27:7

    Google Scholar 

  11. Asteris PG, Koopialipoor M, Armaghani DJ, Kotsonis EA, Lourenço PB (2021) Prediction of cement-based mortars compressive strength using machine learning techniques. Neural Comput Appl 33(19):13089–13121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06004-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Feng D-C, Cetiner B, Kakavand MRA, Taciroglu E (2021) Data-driven approach to predict the plastic hinge length of reinforced concrete columns and its application. J Struct Eng 147(2):4020332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang C, Ma Y (2012) Ensemble machine learning: methods and applications. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Sammut C, Webb GI (2017) Encyclopedia of machine learning and data mining. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Marani A, Jamali A, Nehdi ML (2020) Predicting ultra-high-performance concrete compressive strength using tabular generative adversarial networks. Materials 13(21):1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ahmad M, Keawsawasvong S, Ibrahim MRB, Waseem M, Kashyzadeh KR, Sabri MMS (2022) Novel approach to predicting soil permeability coefficient using gaussian process regression. Sustainability 14(14):8781. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Alabdullh AA et al (2022) Hybrid ensemble model for predicting the strength of FRP laminates bonded to the concrete. Polymers 14(17):3505. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14173505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Biswas R et al (2023) A novel integrated approach of RUNge Kutta optimizer and ANN for estimating compressive strength of self-compacting concrete. Case Stud Constr Mater 18:e02163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cavaleri L, Barkhordari MS, Repapis CC, Armaghani DJ, Ulrikh DV, Asteris PG (2022) Convolution-based ensemble learning algorithms to estimate the bond strength of the corroded reinforced concrete. Constr Build Mater 359:129504

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rakesh Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kumar, R., Rai, B., Samui, P. (2024). A Comparative Study of AdaBoost and K-Nearest Neighbor Regressors for the Prediction of Compressive Strength of Ultra-High Performance Concrete. In: Goel, M.D., Kumar, R., Gadve, S.S. (eds) Recent Developments in Structural Engineering, Volume 1. SEC 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 52. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9625-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9625-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-9624-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-9625-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation