Prediction of Stress Fields in Particulate Polymer Composites Using Micromechanics-Based Artificial Intelligence Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Developments in Structural Engineering, Volume 1 (SEC 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 52))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 111 Accesses

Abstract

Particulate polymer composites (PPC) are widely used in various engineering fields for their high strength-to-weight ratio and impressive mechanical properties. Typically, methods for predicting the mechanical behavior of such materials include tensile tests, finite element simulations, and numerical analysis. However, recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled improved prediction of mechanical behavior of various materials. In AI-based approaches, microstructural information like fiber orientation and grain morphology are generally defined as inputs through multi-dimensional images. The objective of the proposed investigation is to reduce the prediction complexity and computational efficiency in AI-based methods when compared with finite element modeling (FEM). AI-based algorithms are typically data-driven approaches primarily dependent on the input data quality. Subsequently, the optimal selection of the input labels (material properties using FEM software) is imperative to ensure higher prediction accuracy. In this study, we predict the mechanical behavior of a particulate polymer composite based on the images of the stress fields developed from FEM simulations used to train a paired image-to-image translation model (pix2pix). The pix2pix model is based on a conditional Generative Adversarial Network (cGAN), where we train the encoder by 512 × 512 pixel images corresponding to stresses in the y-direction. The results of the AI algorithm show that the pix2pix model is computationally efficient and highly accurate in predicting the effective stress fields of a detailed representative area element of FEM. We observed the maximum accuracy determined by the correlation coefficient as 0.906 at 20,000 iterations of the algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 160.49
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 210.99
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arora A, Sharma A, Singh M, Mahajan DK, Kushvaha V (2023) Fatigue response of glass-filled epoxy composites. A crack initiation and propagation study. Int J Fatigue 170:107542

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kushvaha V, Tippur H (2014) Effect of filler shape, volume fraction and loading rate on dynamic fracture behavior of glass-filled epoxy. Compos B Eng 64:126–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sharma A, Kushvaha V (2020) Predictive modelling of fracture behaviour in silica-filled polymer composite subjected to impact with varying loading rates using artificial neural network. Eng Fract Mech 239:107328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharma A, Munde Y, Kushvaha V (2021) Representative volume element based micromechanical modelling of rod shaped glass filled epoxy composites. SN Appl Sci 3:2047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Das AD, Mannoni G, Früh AE, Orsi D, Pinalli R, Dalcanale E (2019) Damage-reporting carbon fiber epoxy composites. ACS Appl Polym Mater 1:2990–2997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta S, Sharma A, Varma RK, Kushvaha V (2022) A review on performance of near-surface mounted-carbon fiber-reinforced polymer laminates bonded into slits. Polym Compos 43:6782–6802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dan Y, Zhao Y, Li X, Li S, Hu M, Hu J (2020) Generative adversarial networks (GAN) based efficient sampling of chemical composition space for inverse design of inorganic materials. npj Comput Mater 6:617

    Google Scholar 

  8. Capela C, Oliveira SE, Ferreira JAM (2019) Fatigue behavior of short carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Compos B Eng 164:191–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharma A, Madhushri P, Kushvaha V, Kumar A (2020) Prediction of the fracture toughness of silicafilled epoxy composites using K-nearest neighbor (KNN) method. In: 2020 International conference on computational performance evaluation (ComPE). IEEE, pp 194–198

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cataldo F (2008) Study on the reinforcing effect of milled carbon fibers in a natural rubber based composite. J Macromolecular Sci Part B 47:818–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou C, Feng G, Zhao X (2023) An efficient calculation method for stress and strain of concrete pump truck boom considering wind load variation. Machines 11:161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang Z, Yu C-H, Guo K, Buehler MJ (2021) End-to-end deep learning method to predict complete strain and stress tensors for complex hierarchical composite microstructures. J Mech Phys Solids 154:104506

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhaduri A, Gupta A, Graham-Brady L (2022) Stress field prediction in fiber-reinforced composite materials using a deep learning approach. Compos B Eng 238:109879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dey AK (2021) Introduction to Von Mises stress concept

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dey S, Mukhopadhyay T, Adhikari S, Uncertainty quantification in laminated composites: a meta-model based approach. CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  16. Naskar S, Mukhopadhyay T, Sriramula S, Adhikari S (2017) Stochastic natural frequency analysis of damaged thin-walled laminated composite beams with uncertainty in micromechanical properties. Compos Struct 160:312–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Isanaka BR, Mukhopadhyay T, Varma RK, Kushvaha V (2022) On exploiting machine learning for failure pattern driven strength enhancement of honeycomb lattices. Acta Mater 239:118226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guo K, Yang Z, Yu C-H, Buehler MJ (2021) Artificial intelligence and machine learning in design of mechanical materials. Mater Horiz 8:1153–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang Z, Yu C-H, Buehler MJ (2021) Deep learning model to predict complex stress and strain fields in hierarchical composites. Sci Adv 7

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gupta S, Mukhopadhyay T, Kushvaha V (2022) Microstructural image based convolutional neural networks for efficient prediction of full-field stress maps in short fiber polymer composites. Defence Technol 262:619

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rich E, Knight K, Nair Shivashankar B (2009) Artificial intelligence. McGraw Hill Education

    Google Scholar 

  22. Henkes A, Wessels H (2022) Three-dimensional microstructure generation using generative adversarial neural networks in the context of continuum micromechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 400:115497

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharma A, Mukhopadhyay T, Rangappa SM, Kushvaha V (2022) Advances in computational intelligence of polymer composite materials: machine learning assisted modeling, analysis and design. Arch Comput Methods Eng 29:3341–3385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Song H-S, Mugabi J, Jeong J-H (2023) Pix2Pix and deep neural network-based deep learning technology for predicting vortical flow fields and aerodynamic performance of airfoils. Appl Sci 13:1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aggarwal A, Mittal M, Battineni G (2021) Generative adversarial network. An overview of theory and applications. Int J Inf Manage Data Insights 1:100004

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kushvaha V (2016) Synthesis, processing and dynamic fracture behavior of particulate epoxy composites with conventional and hierarchical micro-/nano-fillers. Auburn, Alabama

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nanavati T, Modi H, Patel D, Parikh V, Gupta J (eds) (2020) Generative adversarial networks: a comparative analysis

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shen Y, Moore RH, Deo A (2023) Visualizing Abaqus output database in ParaView. A universal converter in Python and C++. SoftwareX 22:101331

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shabbir H (2014) Post processing of output database (ODB) by Abaqus scripting interface (ASI) and texture analysis by Matlab tool box MTEX. Interdisciplinary Centre for Advanced Materials Simulation (ICAMS)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sristi Gupta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gupta, S., Mukhopadhyay, T., Varade, D., Kushvaha, V. (2024). Prediction of Stress Fields in Particulate Polymer Composites Using Micromechanics-Based Artificial Intelligence Model. In: Goel, M.D., Kumar, R., Gadve, S.S. (eds) Recent Developments in Structural Engineering, Volume 1. SEC 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 52. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9625-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9625-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-9624-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-9625-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation