Abstract
Indonesia has had several bilateral trade and investment agreements named the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) since 2008 with Japan, Chile, Australia, Republic of Korea, and EFTA (European Free Trade Association). This book, this chapter attempts to assess the effects of CEPA on the Indonesian economy. It adopts intra-trade as a proxy for CEPA and unemployment as a proxy for economic benefit. This chapter applies four econometric models of the Generalized Method of Moments, Logistic Regression, Difference and Difference, and Panel Data Regression with country effect. The first model finds the endogenous relationship between CEPA and open unemployment. The second model proved the effectiveness of CEPA in reducing open unemployment. The third model showed the impact of the country and time, and the fourth identified the effect of each selected country. This chapter finds that CEPAs benefit Indonesia's economy, following the economic partner's income level, and CEPA is a sufficient condition instead of a necessary condition. This chapter assesses the effects of the CEPA's trade and long-run investment agreement on Indonesia's economic development. The latter uses the open-unemployment rate as a proxy, and this is a novelty for both ideas and methods, particularly on Indonesia's bilateral economic strategies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aggarwal, S., & Chakraborty, D. (2020). Labour market adjustment and intra-industry trade: Empirical results from Indian manufacturing sectors. Journal of South Asian Development, 15(2), 238–269.
Ambroziak, Ł. (2012). FDI and intra-industry trade: Theory and empirical evidence from the Visegrad Countries. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 4(1–2), 180–198.
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of econometrics, 68, 29–51.
Bhattacharyya, R. (2005). Economic development and intra-industry trade in the Republic of Korea. Journal of Economic Integration, 809–831.
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of econometrics, 87, 115–143.
Burange, L. G., Thakur, P., & Kelkar, H. K. (2017). Foreign direct investment and intra-industry trade in India’s manufacturing sector: A causal relationship. Foreign Trade Review, 52(4), 203–218.
Cabral, R., & Mollick, A. V. (2011). Intra-industry trade effects on Mexican manufacturing productivity before and after NAFTA. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 20(1), 87–112.
Chemsripong, S., Agbola, F. W., & Lee, J. E. (2009). Regional integration and intra-industry trade in manufactures between Thailand and other APEC countries. The Singapore Economic Review, 54(1), 135–148.
Chin, M., Yong, C., & Yew, S. (2015). The determinants of vertical intra-industry trade in SITC 8: The case of ASEAN-5 and China. The Journal of Develo** Areas, 49(4), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2015.0128
Chin, M. Y., Ong, S. L., Wai, C. K., & Puah, C. H. (2020). Vertical intra-industry trade and economic size: The case of Malaysia. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 29(4), 440–454.
Collischon, M., & Eberl, A. (2020). Let’s talk about fixed effects: Let’s talk about all the good things and the bad things. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 72(2), 289–299.
Cororaton, C. B., & Orden, D. (2015). Potential economic effects on the Philippines of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (GII Working Paper 2015–2). https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/91415
Glick, R., & Rose, A. K. (2002). Does a currency union affect trade? The time-series evidence. European economic review, 46(6), 1125–1151.
Grimwade, N. (2003). International trade: New patterns of trade, production and investment. Routledge.
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (2015). Globalization and growth. American Economic Review, 105(5), 100–104.
Grubel, H. G., & Lloyd, P. J. (1975). Intra-industry trade: The theory and measurement of international trade in differentiated products (Vol. 12). Macmillan.
Johnson, D., & Turner, C. (2010). International business: Themes and issues in the modern global economy. Routledge.
Li, C., & Whalley, J. (2021). Effects of the comprehensive and progressive agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. The World Economy, 44(5), 1312–1337.
Li, Q., Scollay, R., & Gilbert, J. (2017). Analyzing the effects of the regional comprehensive economic partnership on FDI in a CGE framework with firm heterogeneity. Economic Modelling, 67, 409–420.
Murakami, Y. (2021). Trade liberalization and wage inequality: Evidence from Chile. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 30(3), 407–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2020.1871502
Natanael, Y., & Verico, K. (2019). The impact analysis of ASEAN movement of natural person in ASEAN-5 countries skilled workers mobility to Indonesia. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 12(6), 523–541.
Petri, P. A., & Plummer, M. G. (2019). Mega-regional agreements and their impact on Australia. Australian Economic Review, 52(4), 468–475.
Ramakrishnan, A., & Varma, P. (2014). Do free trade agreements promote intra-industry trade? The case of India and its FTAs. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 7(2), 129–144.
Rasekhi, S., & Ramezani, M. (2017). The Nexus between economic growth and intra-industry trade. International Journal of Business and Development Studies, 9(1), 47–66.
Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.
Sawyer, W. C., Sprinkle, R. L., & Tochkov, K. (2010). Patterns and determinants of intra-industry trade in Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 21(5), 485–493.
Sharma, K. (2004). Horizontal and vertical intra-industry trade in trans-Tasman bilateral trade. Journal of Economic Integration, 590–603.
Suvannaphakdy, S. (2021). Assessing the impact of the regional comprehensive economic partnership on ASEAN trade. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 38(1), 133–154.
Tharakan, P. K. M. (1985). Empirical analysis of the commodity composition of trade. In Current issues in international trade. Macmillan.
Verico, K. (2015). Open-ended impact of AFTA on FDI inflows: Evidence from macro-level data of Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and firm-level data of Indonesia. Journal of Economic Cooperation & Development, 36(2), 4.
Wong, C. K. K., Liew, V. K. S., & Arip, M. A. (2017). The impact of ASEAN free trade area on Intra-ASEAN manufacturing trade. International Journal of Business and Society, 18(3), 633–643.
Wong, K. Y. (1997). International trade in goods and factor mobility. MIT Press.
Yong, C., Yew, S., Cheong, K.C., & Chin, M. (2015). Does intra-industry trade matter during economic crisis? An assessment of Malaysia-China trade.
Zamroni. (2005). Analysis of intra-industry trade between Indonesia and Japan: A case study in manufactured and agricultural products. Economics and Finance in Indonesia, 53, 97–115.
Source of Data
Badan Pusat Statistik—Indonesia Badan Pusat Statistik (bps.go.id).
World Development Indicators—World Bank World Development Indicators | DataBank (worldbank.org).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Verico, K. (2023). Analysing Bilateral Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) Impacts. In: Indonesia's International Economic Strategies. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8458-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8458-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-8457-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-8458-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)