Analysing Bilateral Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) Impacts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Indonesia's International Economic Strategies
  • 87 Accesses

Abstract

Indonesia has had several bilateral trade and investment agreements named the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) since 2008 with Japan, Chile, Australia, Republic of Korea, and EFTA (European Free Trade Association). This book, this chapter attempts to assess the effects of CEPA on the Indonesian economy. It adopts intra-trade as a proxy for CEPA and unemployment as a proxy for economic benefit. This chapter applies four econometric models of the Generalized Method of Moments, Logistic Regression, Difference and Difference, and Panel Data Regression with country effect. The first model finds the endogenous relationship between CEPA and open unemployment. The second model proved the effectiveness of CEPA in reducing open unemployment. The third model showed the impact of the country and time, and the fourth identified the effect of each selected country. This chapter finds that CEPAs benefit Indonesia's economy, following the economic partner's income level, and CEPA is a sufficient condition instead of a necessary condition. This chapter assesses the effects of the CEPA's trade and long-run investment agreement on Indonesia's economic development. The latter uses the open-unemployment rate as a proxy, and this is a novelty for both ideas and methods, particularly on Indonesia's bilateral economic strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 139.09
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aggarwal, S., & Chakraborty, D. (2020). Labour market adjustment and intra-industry trade: Empirical results from Indian manufacturing sectors. Journal of South Asian Development, 15(2), 238–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambroziak, Ł. (2012). FDI and intra-industry trade: Theory and empirical evidence from the Visegrad Countries. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 4(1–2), 180–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of econometrics, 68, 29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya, R. (2005). Economic development and intra-industry trade in the Republic of Korea. Journal of Economic Integration, 809–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of econometrics, 87, 115–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burange, L. G., Thakur, P., & Kelkar, H. K. (2017). Foreign direct investment and intra-industry trade in India’s manufacturing sector: A causal relationship. Foreign Trade Review, 52(4), 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabral, R., & Mollick, A. V. (2011). Intra-industry trade effects on Mexican manufacturing productivity before and after NAFTA. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 20(1), 87–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chemsripong, S., Agbola, F. W., & Lee, J. E. (2009). Regional integration and intra-industry trade in manufactures between Thailand and other APEC countries. The Singapore Economic Review, 54(1), 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, M., Yong, C., & Yew, S. (2015). The determinants of vertical intra-industry trade in SITC 8: The case of ASEAN-5 and China. The Journal of Develo** Areas, 49(4), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2015.0128

  • Chin, M. Y., Ong, S. L., Wai, C. K., & Puah, C. H. (2020). Vertical intra-industry trade and economic size: The case of Malaysia. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 29(4), 440–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collischon, M., & Eberl, A. (2020). Let’s talk about fixed effects: Let’s talk about all the good things and the bad things. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 72(2), 289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cororaton, C. B., & Orden, D. (2015). Potential economic effects on the Philippines of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (GII Working Paper 2015–2). https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/91415

  • Glick, R., & Rose, A. K. (2002). Does a currency union affect trade? The time-series evidence. European economic review, 46(6), 1125–1151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimwade, N. (2003). International trade: New patterns of trade, production and investment. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (2015). Globalization and growth. American Economic Review, 105(5), 100–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubel, H. G., & Lloyd, P. J. (1975). Intra-industry trade: The theory and measurement of international trade in differentiated products (Vol. 12). Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D., & Turner, C. (2010). International business: Themes and issues in the modern global economy. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C., & Whalley, J. (2021). Effects of the comprehensive and progressive agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. The World Economy, 44(5), 1312–1337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., Scollay, R., & Gilbert, J. (2017). Analyzing the effects of the regional comprehensive economic partnership on FDI in a CGE framework with firm heterogeneity. Economic Modelling, 67, 409–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murakami, Y. (2021). Trade liberalization and wage inequality: Evidence from Chile. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 30(3), 407–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2020.1871502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natanael, Y., & Verico, K. (2019). The impact analysis of ASEAN movement of natural person in ASEAN-5 countries skilled workers mobility to Indonesia. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 12(6), 523–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petri, P. A., & Plummer, M. G. (2019). Mega-regional agreements and their impact on Australia. Australian Economic Review, 52(4), 468–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan, A., & Varma, P. (2014). Do free trade agreements promote intra-industry trade? The case of India and its FTAs. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 7(2), 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasekhi, S., & Ramezani, M. (2017). The Nexus between economic growth and intra-industry trade. International Journal of Business and Development Studies, 9(1), 47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, W. C., Sprinkle, R. L., & Tochkov, K. (2010). Patterns and determinants of intra-industry trade in Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 21(5), 485–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, K. (2004). Horizontal and vertical intra-industry trade in trans-Tasman bilateral trade. Journal of Economic Integration, 590–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suvannaphakdy, S. (2021). Assessing the impact of the regional comprehensive economic partnership on ASEAN trade. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 38(1), 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tharakan, P. K. M. (1985). Empirical analysis of the commodity composition of trade. In Current issues in international trade. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verico, K. (2015). Open-ended impact of AFTA on FDI inflows: Evidence from macro-level data of Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and firm-level data of Indonesia. Journal of Economic Cooperation & Development, 36(2), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C. K. K., Liew, V. K. S., & Arip, M. A. (2017). The impact of ASEAN free trade area on Intra-ASEAN manufacturing trade. International Journal of Business and Society, 18(3), 633–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. Y. (1997). International trade in goods and factor mobility. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yong, C., Yew, S., Cheong, K.C., & Chin, M. (2015). Does intra-industry trade matter during economic crisis? An assessment of Malaysia-China trade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamroni. (2005). Analysis of intra-industry trade between Indonesia and Japan: A case study in manufactured and agricultural products. Economics and Finance in Indonesia, 53, 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

Source of Data

  • Badan Pusat Statistik—Indonesia Badan Pusat Statistik (bps.go.id).

  • World Development Indicators—World Bank World Development Indicators | DataBank (worldbank.org).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiki Verico .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Verico, K. (2023). Analysing Bilateral Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) Impacts. In: Indonesia's International Economic Strategies. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8458-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8458-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-8457-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-8458-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation