SpringerLink
Log in

Artificial Neural Network Ensemble with General Linear Model for Modeling the Landslide Susceptibility in Mirik Region of West Bengal, India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geomorphic Risk Reduction Using Geospatial Methods and Tools

Part of the book series: Disaster Risk Reduction ((DRR))

  • 57 Accesses

Abstract

Landslide is one of the important problems in the Mirik region of West Bengal. For managing this problem it is important to delineate the areas which are highly susceptible to landslide. In the present study ensemble of ANN, general linear model (GLM), and ensemble ANN-GLM machine learning methods were applied for producing the landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) of the Mirik region. A total of 373 landslide locations and twelve landslide conditioning factors (LCFs) are retrieved from the spatial database and used for modeling the landslide susceptibility. Multicollinearity between the LCFs was carried out in order to select suitable LCFs. The built-in models were validated using ROC-AUC, mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and kappa coefficient. Using the 70:30 ratio landslide locations were classified into training and testing datasets. The ANN-GLM model got the lowest RMSE and the highest ROC-AUC (0.864) and kappa index (0.889) during the validation phase (0.086). As per the result of ensemble model 20.99% area of the Mirik region is very highly susceptible for landslide. The anticipated model is reliable in lowering the danger of landslide risks for prospective land use planning in the Mirik region of West Bengal 112.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 160.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • A** RS, Saha S, Saha A, Biju A, Costache R, Kuriakose SL (2022) Enhancing the accuracy of the REP tree by integrating the hybrid ensemble meta-classifiers for modelling the landslide susceptibility of Idukki district, South-western India. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 50(11):2245–2265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Environ 58:21–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arabameri A, Pradhan B, Rezaei K, Sohrabi M, Kalantari Z (2019) GIS-based landslide susceptibility map** using numerical risk factor bivariate model and its ensemble with linear multivariate regression and boosted regression tree algorithms. J Mt Sci 16:595–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility map** in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65:15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Can R, Kocaman S, Gokceoglu C (2019) A convolutional neural network architecture for auto-detection of landslide photographs to assess citizen science and volunteered geographic information data quality. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 8:300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Pourghasemi HR, Zhao Z (2017) A GIS-based comparative study of Dempster-Shafer, logistic regression and artificial neural network models for landlside susceptibility map**. Geocarto Int 32:367–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corominas J, Van Westen C, Frattini P et al (2014) Recommendations or the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73:209–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Di B, Stamatopoulos CA, Dandoulaki M, Stavrogiannopoulou E, Zhang M (2017) A method predicting the earthquake-induced landslide risk by back analyses of past landslides and its application in the region of the Wenchuan 12/5/2008 earthquake. Nat Hazards 85:903–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du G, Zhang Y, Iqbal J (2017) Landslide susceptibility map** using an integrated model of information value method and logistic regression in the Bailongjiang watershed, Gansu Province, China. J Mt Sci 14:249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garosi Y, Sheklabadi M, Pourghasemi HR, Besalatpour AA, Conoscenti C, Van Oost K (2018) Comparison of differences in resolution and sources of controlling factors for gully erosion susceptibility map**. Geoderma 330:65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143(1):29–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hong H, Liu J, Bui DT, Pradhan B, Acharya TD, Pham BT, ** using J48 decision tree with AdaBoost, bagging and rotation forest ensembles in the Guangchang area (China). CATENA 163:399–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalantar B, Pradhan B, Naghibi SA, Motevalli A, Mansor S (2018) Assessment of the effects of training data selection on the landslide susceptibility map**: a comparison between support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural network (ANN). Geomat Nat Hazard Risk 9:49–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo D, Arora M, Sarkar S, Gupta R (2006) A comparative study of conventional, ANN black box, fuzzy and combined neural and fuzzy weighting procedures for landslide susceptibility zonation in Darjeeling Himalayas. Eng Geol 85:347–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Sarkar R (2022) Debris flow susceptibility evaluation—a review. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Song KY, Oh HJ, Choi J (2012) Detection of landslide using web-based aerial photographs and landslide susceptibility map** using geospatial analysis. Int J Remote Sens 33:4937–4966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Seong WJ, Oh KY, Lee MJ (2016) The spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility applying artificial neural network and logistic regression models: a case study of Inje, Korea. Open Geosci 8:117–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Hong S, Jung H (2017) A support vector machine for landslide susceptibility map** in Gangwon province, Korea. Sustainability 9:48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Wang N, Chen J (2021) GIS-based landslide susceptibility map** using information, frequency ratio, and artificial neural network methods in Qinghai Province, Northwestern China. Adv Civ Eng 2021:4758062

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal S, Mondal S (2019) Machine learning models and spatial distribution of landslide susceptibility. In: Geoinformatics and modelling of landslide susceptibility and risk. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, pp 165–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Maunder MN, Punt AE (2004) Standardizing catch and effort data: a review of recent approaches. Fish Res 70:141–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh P, Nelder J (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Standard book on generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Naghibi SA, Pourghasemi HR (2015) A comparative assessment between three machine learning models and their performance comparison by bivariate and multivariate statistical methods in groundwater potential map**. Water Resour Manag 29:5217–5236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelder JA, Wedderburn RW (1972) Generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc Ser A (general) 135:370–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh HJ, Lee S, Hong SM (2017) Landslide susceptibility assessment using frequency ratio technique with iterative random sampling. J Sens 2017:21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor M, Haddad B, Sorbino G, Cuomo S, Drempetic V (2009) A depth-integrated coupled SPH model for flow-like landslides and related phenomena. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 33:143–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham BT, Khosravi K, Prakash I (2017) Application and comparison of decision tree-based machine learning methods in landslide susceptibility assessment at PauriGarhwal area, Uttarakhand, India. Environ Process 4:711–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Rossi M (2017) Landslide susceptibility modeling in a landslide prone area in Mazandarn Province, north of Iran: A comparison between GLM, GAM, MARS, and M-AHP methods. Theor Appl Clim 130:609–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan AMS, Kang HS, Lee S, Kim YT (2017a) Spatial model integration for shallow landslide susceptibility and its run out using a GIS-based approach in Yongin, Korea. Geocarto Int 32:420–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Seeni M, Kalantar B (2017) Performance evaluation and sensitivity analysis of expert-based, statistical, machine learning, and hybrid models for producing landslide susceptibility maps. Laser scanning applications in landslide assessment, pp 193–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Regmi NR, Giardino JR, McDonald EV, Vitek JD (2014) A comparison of logistic regression-based models of susceptibility to landslides in western Colorado, USA. Landslides 11:247–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokach L (2010) Ensemble-based classifiers. Artif Intell Rev 33:1–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha A, Mandal S, Saha S (2020) Geo-spatial approach-based landslide susceptibility map** using analytical hierarchical process, frequency ratio, logistic regression and their ensemble methods. SN Appl Sci 2(10):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha A, Saha S (2022) Landslide susceptibility assessment and management using advanced hybrid machine learning algorithms in Darjeeling Himalaya, India. In: Applied geomorphology and contemporary issues. Springer, Cham, pp 667–681

    Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui D, Tuan TA, Klempe H, Pradhan B, Revhaug I (2015) Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree. Landslides 13:361–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui D, Ho TC, Pradhan B, Pham BT, Nhu VH, Revhaug I (2016) GIS-based modeling of rainfall-induced landslides using data mining-based functional trees classifier with AdaBoost, Bagging, and MultiBoost ensemble frameworks. Environ Earth Sci 75:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Westen CJ, Castellanos E, Kuriakose SL (2008) Spatial data for landslide susceptibility, hazard, and vulnerability assessment: an overview. EngGeol 102:112–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorpahl P, Elsenbeer H, Märker M, Schröder B (2012) How can statistical models help to determine driving factors of landslides? Ecol Model 239:27–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang LJ, Guo M, Sawada K, Lin J, Zhang J (2015) Landslide susceptibility map** in Mizunami City, Japan: a comparison between logistic regression, bivariate statistical analysis and multivariate adaptive regression spline models. CATENA 135:271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wubalem A, Meten M (2020) Landslide susceptibility map** using information value and logistic regression models in GonchaSisoEneses area, northwestern Ethiopia. SN Appl Sci 807

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Gour Banga, Malda, 732103, West Bengal, India

    Sunil Saha, Anik Saha & Bishnu Roy

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Delhi Technological University, New Delhi, 110042, India

    Ankit Chaudhary & Raju Sarkar

Authors
  1. Sunil Saha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anik Saha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bishnu Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ankit Chaudhary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Raju Sarkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raju Sarkar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Delhi Technological University, Delhi, India

    Raju Sarkar

  2. Department of Geography, University of Gour Banga, Malda, West Bengal, India

    Sunil Saha

  3. Department of Civil Engineering, Pulchowk Campus, Institute of Engineering, Tribhuvan University, Lalitpur, Nepal

    Basanta Raj Adhikari

  4. Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, Japan

    Rajib Shaw

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Saha, S., Saha, A., Roy, B., Chaudhary, A., Sarkar, R. (2024). Artificial Neural Network Ensemble with General Linear Model for Modeling the Landslide Susceptibility in Mirik Region of West Bengal, India. In: Sarkar, R., Saha, S., Adhikari, B.R., Shaw, R. (eds) Geomorphic Risk Reduction Using Geospatial Methods and Tools. Disaster Risk Reduction. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7707-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation