Machine Learning-Assisted Modeling of Pressure Hessian Tensor

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power, Volume 4 (FMFP 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 192 Accesses

Abstract

Velocity gradient dynamics play a pivotal role in understanding various nonlinear phenomena in turbulent flows. In the evolution of velocity gradient dynamics, the pressure Hessian and the viscous Laplacian are two mathematically unclosed terms which need separate modeling. The current study models the pressure Hessian term using the tensor basis neural network (TBNN). The network is trained on direct numerical simulation (DNS) data of stationary incompressible turbulence conditioned on local flow topologies. We compare the topology-based TBNN model performance with the DNS results as well as with the unconditioned (raw) TBNN model. The model results are evaluated in terms of the strain rate and the pressure Hessian eigenvector alignments. The model captures some of the essential alignment features of the DNS results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Batchelor GK (1952) The effect of homogeneous turbulence on material lines and surfaces. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 213(1114):349–366

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cantwell BJ (1992) Exact solution of a restricted Euler equation for the velocity gradient tensor. Phys Fluids A Fluid Dyn 4(4):782–793

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chevillard L, Meneveau C, Biferale L, Toschi F (2008) Modeling the pressure Hessian and viscous Laplacian in turbulence: comparisons with direct numerical simulation and implications on velocity gradient dynamics. Phys Fluids 20(10):101504

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chevillard L, Meneveau C (2006) Lagrangian dynamics and statistical geometric structure of turbulence. Phys Rev Lett 97(17):174501

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chong MS, Perry AE, Cantwell BJ (1990) A general classification of three-dimensional flow fields. Phys Fluids A Fluid Dyn 2(5):765–777

    Google Scholar 

  6. Danish M, Sinha SS, Srinivasan B (2016) Influence of compressibility on the Lagrangian statistics of vorticity–strain-rate interactions. Phys Rev E 94(1):013101

    Google Scholar 

  7. Danish M, Suman S, Srinivasan B (2014) A direct numerical simulation-based investigation and modeling of pressure Hessian effects on compressible velocity gradient dynamics. Phys Fluids 26(12):126103

    Google Scholar 

  8. Girimaji SS, Pope SB (1990) Material-element deformation in isotropic turbulence. J Fluid Mech 220:427–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. http://turbulence.pha.jhu.edu

  10. Jeong E, Girimaji SS (2003) Velocity-gradient dynamics in turbulence: effect of viscosity and forcing. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 16(6):421–432

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li Y, Meneveau C (2005) Origin of non-Gaussian statistics in hydrodynamic turbulence. Phys Rev Lett 95(16):164502

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li Y, Meneveau C (2006) Intermittency trends and Lagrangian evolution of non-Gaussian statistics in turbulent flow and scalar transport. J Fluid Mech 558:133–142

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li Y, Perlman E, Wan M, Yang Y, Meneveau C, Burns R, Chen S, Szalay A, Eyink G (2008) A public turbulence database cluster and applications to study Lagrangian evolution of velocity increments in turbulence. J Turbul 9:N31

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ling J, Kurzawski A, Templeton J (2016) Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance. J Fluid Mech 807:155–166

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin J, Ooi A, Dopazo C, Chong MS, Soria J (1997) The inverse diffusion time scale of velocity gradients in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Phys Fluids 9(4):814–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Meneveau C (2011) Lagrangian dynamics and models of the velocity gradient tensor in turbulent flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 43(1):219–245

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Neill P, Soria J (2005) The relationship between the topological structures in turbulent flow and the distribution of a passive scalar with an imposed mean gradient. Fluid Dyn Res 36(3):107

    Google Scholar 

  18. Parashar N, Sinha SS, Srinivasan B (2019) Lagrangian investigations of velocity gradients in compressible turbulence: lifetime of flow-field topologies. J Fluid Mech 872:492–514

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Parashar N, Srinivasan B, Sinha SS (2020) Modeling the pressure-Hessian tensor using deep neural networks. Phys Rev Fluids 5(11):114604

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pope SB (1975) A more general effective-viscosity hypothesis. J Fluid Mech 72(2):331–340

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pope SB (1985) PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows. Prog Energy Combust Sci 11(2):119–192

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pope SB, Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pumir A (1994) A numerical study of the mixing of a passive scalar in three dimensions in the presence of a mean gradient. Phys Fluids 6(6):2118–2132

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Suman S, Girimaji SS (2009) Homogenized Euler equation: a model for compressible velocity gradient dynamics. J Fluid Mech 620:177–194

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Suman S, Girimaji SS (2011) Dynamical model for velocity-gradient evolution in compressible turbulence. J Fluid Mech 683:289–319

    Google Scholar 

  26. Suman S, Girimaji SS (2010) Velocity gradient invariants and local flow-field topology in compressible turbulence. J Turbul 11:N2

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vieillefosse P (1982) Local interaction between vorticity and shear in a perfect incompressible fluid. J Phys 43(6):837–842

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu H, Pumir A, Bodenschatz E (2011) The pirouette effect in turbulent flows. Nat Phys 7(9):709–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the computational support provided by the High-Performance Computing (HPC) center of the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deep Shikha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shikha, D., Sinha, S.S. (2024). Machine Learning-Assisted Modeling of Pressure Hessian Tensor. In: Singh, K.M., Dutta, S., Subudhi, S., Singh, N.K. (eds) Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power, Volume 4. FMFP 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7177-0_78

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7177-0_78

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-7176-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-7177-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation