Order Selection of the Finite Mixture Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Statistical Inference Under Mixture Models

Part of the book series: ICSA Book Series in Statistics ((ICSABSS))

  • 266 Accesses

Abstract

The order selection problem, in contrast to determining whether a lower-ordered finite mixture model should be rejected in favor of a higher-ordered model, seeks to answer the question of what constitutes the most appropriate order for the finite mixture model. The challenge here lies in the fact that there are as many criteria for ”most suitable” as there are statisticians, making it a far more diverse problem than a simple hypothesis test. Moreover, each of these criteria often cannot be directly evaluated but requires approximations using complex asymptotic tools. The already intricate nature of finite mixture models further compounds this challenge. In Chap. 16, we offer a brief overview of several order selection procedures for finite mixture models. These include the transplanted Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayes Information Criterion (BIC), as well as somewhat tailored Widely Applicable Bayesian Information Criterion (WBIC) and Singular Bayesian Information Criterion (sBIC), in addition to regularization-based techniques. This chapter serves as a limited introduction to these various methods without endorsing any particular approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Second International Symposium on Information Theory, eds. B.N. Petrox and F. Caski, 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L. 1996. Heuristics of instability and stabilization in model selection. The Annals of Statistics 24 (6): 2350–2383.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., and J. D. Kalbfleisch. 1996. Penalized minimum-distance estimates in finite mixture models. Canadian Journal of Statistics 24 (2): 167–175.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., and A. Khalili. 2009. Order selection in finite mixture models with a nonsmooth penalty. Journal of the American Statistical Association 104 (485): 187–196.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Drton, M., and M. Plummer. 2017. A bayesian information criterion for singular models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 79 (2): 323–380.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J., and R. Li. 2001. Variable selection via nonconcave penalized likelihood and its oracle properties. Journal of the American statistical Association 96 (456): 1348–1360.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Keribin, C. 2000. Consistent estimation of the order of mixture models. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics. Series A 62: 49–66.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Leroux, B. G. 1992a. Consistent estimation of a mixing distribution. The Annals of Statistics 20 (3): 1350–1360.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Manole, T., and A. Kahalili. 2021. Estimating the number of components in finite mixture models via the group-sort-fuse procedure. Annuals of Statistics 49 (6): 3043–3069.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, G. 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics 6 (2): 461–464.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, J. (2003). Mathematical Statistics. Cham: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tibshirani, R. 1996. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 58(1), 267–288.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, S. 2009. Algebraic Geometry and Statistical Learning Theory, vol. 25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, S. 2013. A widely applicable bayesian information criterion. Journal of Machine Learning Research 14 (27): 867–897.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, H. 2006. The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties. Journal of the American statistical association 101 (476): 1418–1429.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, H., and H. H. Zhang. 2009. On the adaptive elastic-net with a diverging number of parameters. Annals of Statistics 37 (4): 1733.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chen, J. (2023). Order Selection of the Finite Mixture Models. In: Statistical Inference Under Mixture Models. ICSA Book Series in Statistics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6141-2_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation