Thermal Analysis of Evacuated Tube Receiver for Solar Power Tower by Transient Simulation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICREEM 2022 (ICREEM 2022)

Abstract

Solar thermal power is a promising and rapidly expanding source of carbon-free energy. Analysis and design techniques for solar thermal power generation for the Solar Power Tower (SPT) systems are currently mathematically difficult. We simulated a model of a SPT that advances the simulation of SPT performance by modelling them in Thermolib software. The model in this study simulates SPT with a direct steam generation system with design variables of 0.04 kg/s heat transfer fluid (HTF) flow rate at 6 bar operating pressure using water as HTF. The reaction to varied operating pressure, fluid flow rates, and insolation input has been analysed. The simulation results show that steam will be produced at 1–3 bar with maximum steam quality of 0.06, 0.02 and 0.0015, respectively. Lowering the HTF flow rates to 0.02 and 0.03 kg/s will produce steam with maximum quality of 0.15 and 0.028, respectively. Increasing the amount of heliostat from 15 to 20 in staggered formation results in a 14.5% increase in power received by the receiver, resulting in a maximum steam quality produced of 0.029. The analysis shows that high quality of steam can be achieved with a lower HTF flow rate and pressure, but it compromises the useful energy generated by turbine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Faye K, Thiam A, Faye M (2021) Optimum height and tilt angle of the solar receiver for a 30 kWe solar tower power plant for the electricity production in the Sahelian Zone. Int J Photoenergy 2021:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1961134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kolb GJ, Ho CK, Mancini TR, Gary JA (2011) Power tower technology roadmap and cost reduction plan, 38

    Google Scholar 

  3. Luo Y, Du X, Yang L, Xu C, Amjad M (2017) Impacts of solar multiple on the performance of direct steam generation solar power tower plant with integrated thermal storage. Front Energy 11(4):461–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-017-0503-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xu R, Wiesner TF (2015) Closed-form modeling of direct steam generation in a parabolic trough solar receiver. Energy 79:163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eck M, Steinmann WD (2005) Modelling and design of direct solar steam generating collector fields. J Sol Energy Eng-Trans ASME 127(3):371e80

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hirsch T, Eck M, Steinmann W-D (2005) Simulation of transient two-phase flow in parabolic trough collectors using Modelica. In: Proceedings of the 4th international Modelica conference, Hamburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eck M, Hirsch T (2007) Dynamics and control of parabolic trough collector loops with direct steam generation. Sol Energy 81(2):268e79

    Google Scholar 

  8. Silva R, Perez M, Fernandez-Garcia A (2013) Modeling and co-simulation of a parabolic trough solar plant for industrial process heat. Appl Energy 106:287e300

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roldan MI, Valenzuela L, Zarza E (2013) Thermal analysis of solar receiver pipes with superheated steam. Appl Energy 103:73e84

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yan Q, Hu E, Yang YP, Zhai RR (2010) Dynamic modeling and simulation of a solar direct steam-generating system. Int J Energy Res 34(15):1341e55

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martínez I, Almanza R (2007) Experimental and theoretical analysis of annular twophase flow regimen in direct steam generation for a low-power system. Sol Energy 81(2):216e26

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ritschel TKS, Gaspar J, Jørgensen JB (2017) A thermodynamic library for simulation and optimization of dynamic processes. IFAC-Papers OnLine 50(1):3542–3547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thomson GH (1996) The DIPPRR© databases. Int J Thermophys 17(1):223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peng D-Y, Robinson DB (1976) A new two-constant equation of state. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 15(1):59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Soave G (1972) Equilibrium constants from a modified Redlich-Kwong equation of state. Chem Eng Sci 27(6):1197–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shibata SK, Sandler SI (1989) Critical evaluation of equation of state mixing rules for the prediction of high-pressure phase equilibria. Ind Eng Chem Res 28(12):1893–1898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chapman JW, Lavelle TM, May RD, Litt JS, Guo T-H (2014) Toolbox for the modeling and analysis of thermodynamic systems (T-MATS) user’s guide. Technical report, NASA’s Glenn Research Center

    Google Scholar 

  18. Martín A, Bermejo MD, Mato FA, Cocero MJ (2011) Teaching advanced equations of state in applied thermodynamics courses using open source programs. Educ Chem Eng 6(4):e114–e121

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sundman B, Kattner UR, Palumbo M, Fries SG (2015) OpenCalphad—a free thermodynamic software. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 4 (1)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Simulink, & User (nd) Simulation toolbox for the Design and Development of Thermodynamic Systems in MATLAB. https://www.thermolib.de/media/thermolib/downloads/Thermolib-UserManual.pdf

  21. Tempesti D, Manfrida G, Fiaschi D (2012) Thermodynamic analysis of two micro CHP systems operating with geothermal and solar energy. Appl Energy 97:609–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hossin K, Mahkamov K (2015) Performance evaluation for a 10 kW solar organic rankine cycle power system to operate in the UK climate conditions. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4135.4721

  23. Thermolib. http://www.eutech-scientific.de/productsservices/thermolib.html

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) IF1020l1308 (cost centre 015ME0-217) and Yayasan Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (YUTP) FRGS (cost centre 0153AA-H28) for providing financial support for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad Zaimmul Adli Bin Abdullah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Institute of Technology PETRONAS Sdn Bhd (Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS)

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bin Abdullah, A.Z.A., Muhammad, M.D., Gilani, S.I.UH., Ali, M., Al-Kayiem, H.H. (2024). Thermal Analysis of Evacuated Tube Receiver for Solar Power Tower by Transient Simulation. In: Ahmad, F., Iskandar, T., Habib, K. (eds) ICREEM 2022. ICREEM 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5946-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5946-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5945-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5946-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation