Abstract
Game theory has become an indispensable tool in international politics, offering valuable insights into the complex and strategic decision-making processes that govern the interactions between nations, international organizations, and non-state actors. As a mathematical framework for understanding strategic behavior and predicting outcomes, game theory allows scholars and policymakers to model and analyze the myriad of factors that influence the actions and choices of actors on the international stage. This chapter explores the role of game theory in international politics, highlighting its key concepts, applications, and contributions to our understanding of global dynamics. Additionally, we discuss the potential limitations and challenges of applying game theory in the intricate and ever-changing landscape of international politics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adler, I. (2013). The equivalence of linear programs and zero-sum games. International Journal of Game Theory, 42(1), 165.
Amadae, S. M. (2016). Prisoners of reason: Game theory and neoliberal political economy. Cambridge University Press.
Aumann, R. J. (1987). Game theory. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, & P. Newman (Eds.), The new Palgrave: A dictionary of economics. Macmillan.
Beckenkamp, M., Hennig‐Schmidt, H., & Maier-Rigaud, F. P. (2007). Cooperation in symmetric and asymmetric prisoner’s dilemma games. MPI Collective Goods Preprint (2006/25).
Bernheim, B. D., Peleg, B., & Whinston, M. D. (1987). Coalition-proof Nash equilibria I. concepts. Journal of Economic Theory, 42(1), 1–12.
Bierman, H. S., & Fernandez, L. F. (1998). Game theory with economic applications. Addison-Wesley.
Camerer, C. F. (2011). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press.
Carmona, G., & Podczeck, K. (2009). On the existence of pure-strategy equilibria in large games. Journal of Economic Theory, 144(3), 1300–1319.
Chess, D. M. (1988). Simulating the evolution of behavior: The iterated prisoners’ dilemma problem. Complex Systems, 2(6), 663–670.
Collins, R. W. (2022). The Prisoner’s Dilemma paradox: Rationality, morality, and reciprocity. Think, 21(61), 45–55.
Dutta, P. K. (1999). Strategies and games: Theory and practice. MIT Press.
Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press.
Harsanyi, J. C. (1973). Oddness of the number of equilibrium points: A new proof. International Journal of Game Theory, 2(1), 235–250.
Hew, S. L., & White, L. B. (2008). Cooperative resource allocation games in shared networks: Symmetric and asymmetric fair bargaining models. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(11), 4166–4175.
Kreps, D. M. (1987). Nash equilibrium. In The new Palgrave dictionary of economics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Marwala, T. (2013). Multi-agent approaches to economic modeling: Game theory, ensembles, evolution and the stock market. In Economic modeling using artificial intelligence methods (pp. 195–213). Springer.
Marwala, T., & Hurwitz, E. (2017). Game theory. In Artificial intelligence and economic theory: Skynet in the market (pp. 75–88). Springer.
Munoz-Garcia, F., & Toro-Gonzalez, D. (2019). Pure strategy Nash equilibrium and simultaneous-move games with complete information. In Strategy and game theory: Practice exercises with answers (pp. 39–86). Springer.
Nash, J. F., Jr. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 36(1), 48–49.
Olson, E. S. (2010). Zero-sum game: The rise of the world’s largest derivatives exchange. Wiley.
Poundstone, W. (1993). Prisoner’s dilemma: John von Neumann, game theory, and the puzzle of the bomb. Anchor.
Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. (1966). The game of chicken. American Behavioral Scientist, 10(3), 10–28.
Rapoport, A., Chammah, A. M., & Orwant, C. J. (1965). Prisoner’s dilemma: A study in conflict and cooperation (Vol. 165). University of Michigan Press.
Schneider, M., & Shields, T. (2022). Motives for cooperation in the one-shot Prisoner’s Dilemma. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 23(4), 438–456.
Sun, C. H. (2020). Simultaneous and sequential choice in a symmetric two-player game with canyon-shaped payoffs. The Japanese Economic Review, 71(2), 191–219.
Washburn, A. (2014). Single person background. Two-Person Zero-Sum Games, 1–4.
Wilson, R. (1971). Computing equilibria of n-person games. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 21(1), 80–87.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marwala, T. (2023). Game Theory in Politics. In: Artificial Intelligence, Game Theory and Mechanism Design in Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5103-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5103-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5102-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5103-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)