Abstract
Moving vehicle excites the bridge with dynamic force which is realised as a stationary process when the vehicle velocity is constant. However, this condition is not always true when the vehicle speed varies with time while travelling over the bridge. In this paper, the bridge response to non-stationary excitation has been studied considering speed variation, uneven pavement and also random arrival rate of the vehicle. The bridge vehicle interaction has been modelled using continuum approach and the solution has been obtained using orthogonal polynomial expansion method. The generalised co-ordinates of the system response are expressed in terms of orthogonal polynomial series, which offered certain advantages to arrive at the expression of first and second order statistics of system response using the properties of the polynomial. The movement of multiple vehicles has been considered in different time windows assuming their arrival rate follows a Poisson process. Response statistics- mean and standard deviation has been studied for a single cell box girder section of single span bridge in different time windows to observe the effect of vehicle arrival rate, vehicle speed and acceleration and pavement unevenness. The amplification of maximum static flexural stress due to dynamic effect has been obtained incorporating the standard error of the mean. Sequence of accelerating vehicles is found to cause higher stress in a bridge with poor maintenance of surface. The segment of response history in an optimal time window is found to decrease the computational cost since the presence of total number of vehicles over the bridge were dependent on the vehicle speed and their arrival rate.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- DAF:
-
Dynamic Amplification Factor
- SEM:
-
Standard Error of the Mean
- DI:
-
Dynamic Increment
- As:
-
Amplitude of cosine wave
- cs:
-
Suspension dam**
- cw:
-
Tyre dam**
- C:
-
Dam** matrix
- Cmean:
-
Mean values of dam** matrix
- F:
-
Force vector
- Fdynamic:
-
Maximum dynamic response on the bridge
- Fmean:
-
Mean values of force vector
- Fstatic:
-
Maximum static response of the bridge
- h(\(\tilde{x }\)):
-
Bridge deck profile
- hmean(\(\tilde{x }\)):
-
Deterministic mean surface profile
- hroad(\(\tilde{x }\)):
-
Random road roughness of the pavement
- ks:
-
Suspension stiffness
- kw:
-
Trye stiffness
- K:
-
Ztiffness matrix
- Kmean:
-
Mean values of stiffness matrix
- L:
-
Span of the bridge
- \({L}_{l}^{n}\left(\stackrel{\sim }{\lambda }{t}_{n}\right)\):
-
Orthogonal function considered
- ms:
-
Sprung mass
- mw:
-
Unsprung mass
- M:
-
Mass matrix
- n:
-
Shape parameter of Gamma distribution and represents number of vehicle arrivals
- nd:
-
Number of degrees of freedom
- N:
-
Number of terms used to construct the road surface roughness
- Ns:
-
Number of samples
- N1:
-
Number of basic functions with respect to \(\stackrel{\sim }{\lambda }{t}_{n}\)
- ptn(t):
-
Probability density function of the arrival time
- Qil(t):
-
Time variation of displacement
- \(\tilde{x }\):
-
Spatial distance
- tn:
-
Vehicle arrival time on the bridge
- v:
-
Velocity of vehicle
- \({\text{y}}\left( {\tilde{x},{\text{t}}} \right)\):
-
Displacement of the bridge at time instant, t at location, \(\tilde{x }\)
- z1:
-
Displacement of sprung mass
- z2:
-
Displacement of unsprung mass
- δlk:
-
Kronecker delta function
- Г:
-
Gamma function
- \(\stackrel{\sim }{\lambda }\):
-
Mean arrival rate
- µ(\(\stackrel{\sim }{\lambda }{t}_{n}\)):
-
Mean arrival time
- \(\mu_{{\text{f}}} \left( {\tilde{x},{\text{t}}} \right)\):
-
Mean of bridge response
- \(\sigma_{{\text{f}}} \left( {\tilde{x},{\text{t}}} \right)\):
-
Standard deviation of bridge response
- θs:
-
Independent random phase angle uniformly distributed from 0 to 2Ï€
- ΩL:
-
Lower cut off frequencies of spatial unevenness
- Ωs:
-
Spatial frequency (c/m)
- ΩU:
-
Upper cut off frequencies of spatial unevenness
References
Fryba L. Dynamics of railway bridges. Academia Praha; 1996.
Blejwas TE, Feng CC, Ayre RS. Dynamic interaction of moving vehicles and structures. J Sound Vib. 1979;67(4):513–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(79)90442-5
Green MF, Cebon D. Dynamic interaction between heavy vehicles and highway bridges. Comput Struct. 1997;62(2):253–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(96)00198-8
Yang YB, Lin CW. Vehicle-bridge interaction dynamics and potential applications. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd; 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.06.032
Zeng Q, Stoura CD, Dimitrakopoulos EG. A localized lagrange multipliers approach for the problem of vehicle-bridge-interaction. Eng Struct. 2018;168:82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.040.
Coussy O, Said M, van Hoove J-P. The influence of random surface irregularities on the dynamic response of bridges under suspended moving loads. J Sound Vib. 1989;130(2):313–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(89)90556-7
Frýba L. Vibration of solids and structures under moving loads. London: Thomas Telford Ltd.; 1972.
Pesterev AV, Bergman LA, Tan CA, Tsao TC, Yang B. On asymptotics of the solution of the moving oscillator problem. J Sound Vib. 2003;260(3):519–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(02)00953-7
Frýba L. Non-stationary response of a beam to a moving random force. J Sound Vib. 1976;46(3):323–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(76)90857-9
Sniady P. Vibration of of a beam due to a random stream of moving forces with random velocity. J Sound Vib. 1984;97(1):23–33.
Turner JD, Pretlove AJ. A study of the spectrum of traffic-induced bridge vibration. J Sound Vib. 1988;122(1):31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(88)80004-X
Virchis VJ, Robson JD, Response of an accelerating vehicle to random road undulations. Journal of Sound and Vibration; 1971. 18(3): 423–71.
Hammond JK, Harrison RF. Non-stationary response of vehicles on rough ground. J Dyn Syst Meas Control Trans ASME. 1981;103(3):245–50.
Nigam NC, Yadav D. Dynamic response of accelerating vehicles to ground roughness. In: Proceedings Noise shock and veibration conference. Monas University; 1974. pp. 280–5.
Hwang JH, Kim JS. On the approximate solution aircraft landing gear under non-stationary random excitations. KSME Int J. 2000;14(9):968–77.
Sasidhar MN, Talukdar S. Non-stationary response of bridge due to eccentrically moving vehicles at non-uniform velocity. Adv Struct Eng. 2003;6(4):309–24.
Yin X, Fang Z, Cai CS, Deng L. Non-stationary random vibration of bridges under vehicles with variable speed. Eng Struct. 2010;32(8):2166–2174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.03.019
Li J, Chen J. Stochastic dynamics of structures. Wiley (Asia) Pte Ltd; 2009.
Nigam NC. Introduction to random vibrations. Masachusetts, London, England: The MIT Press Cambridge; 1983.
Schoutens W. Lecture notes in statistics. In: Bickel P, Diggle P, Fienberg S, Krickeberg K, Olkin I, Wermuth N, Zeger S (Eds.), Stochastic processes and Orthogonal polynomials. Springer; 2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1470-0
Chopra AK. Dynamic of structures theory and applications to earthquake engineering. (W. J. Hall, Ed.) (Fourth). Prentice Hall; 2011.
IRC 6. Standard specifications and code of practice for road bridges, section-II Loads and stresses. Indian Road Congress, New Delhi, 2017.
Humar JL, Kashif AM. Dynamic response of bridges under travelling loads. Canadian J Civil Eng. 1993;20(2):287–298. https://doi.org/10.1139/l93-033
DeCoursey W. Statistics and probability for engineering applications. Elsevier; 2003.
Sun L, Kennedy TW. Spectral analysis and parametric study of stochastic pavement loads. J Eng Mech. 2002;128(3):318–327. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:3(318)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pillai, A.J., Talukdar, S. (2023). Non-stationary Response of a Bridge Due to Moving Vehicle with Random Arrival Rate. In: Tiwari, R., Ram Mohan, Y.S., Darpe, A.K., Kumar, V.A., Tiwari, M. (eds) Vibration Engineering and Technology of Machinery, Volume I. VETOMAC 2021. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 137. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4721-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4721-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-4720-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-4721-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)