Development of a Fully Automated Atmospheric Correction Technique for Applications in Google Earth Engine

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Development in River Corridor Management (RCRM 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 376))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 147 Accesses

Abstract

For any satellite-based study, ground-based reflectance values are required. Nowadays, these ground-based reflectance products are provided by all the major space agencies, commonly designated as level 2 products. However, the availability of the level 2 products takes some time and once in a while, these products are not available. For the development of near real-time monitoring systems, this poses a major problem, and thus it becomes necessary to correct the raw satellite imagery by using atmospheric correction techniques. The Dark Object Subtraction technique (DOS) is one such commonly used technique used previously in many studies. However, it requires the manual selection of the darkest pixels in the imagery, thus making it unsuitable for automation-based systems. This study aims to automate the process of Dark Object Subtraction Sentinel 2A raw satellite imageries within the Google Earth Engine platform. Mean annual LULC maps generated using automated Dark Object Subtraction could replicate the level 2 product quite accurately. These classified imageries for July 2018−July 2019 produced overall classification accuracies of 74.13 and 67.24% using Random Forest Classifier and Support Vector Machines, respectively, compared to 68.96% obtained for both the classification algorithms using level 2 products. In the period July 2019−July 2020, it was obtained as 81.03 and 77.58%, respectively, compared to 79.31% for the same, and for July 2020- July 2021, it was 72.41 and 68.96% against 68.96 and 67.24%. The automated Dark Object Subtraction technique can thus be employed to develop near real-time automated satellite imagery-based systems within the Google Earth Engine platform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 160.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 213.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams JB, Gillespie AR (2006) Remote sensing of landscapes with spectral images: A physical modeling approach. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahern FJ, Goodenough DG, Jain SC, Rao VR, Rochon G (1977) Use of clear lake as standard reflectors for atmospheric measurement. In: ERIM Proc. of the 11th Intern Symp on Remote Sensing of Environment, vol 1

    Google Scholar 

  3. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5-32

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chavez PS Jr (1988) An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data. Remote Sens Environ 24(3):459–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chavez PS (1996) Image-based atmospheric corrections-revisited and improved. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 62(9):1025–1035

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ding H, Shi J, Wang Y, Wei L (2015) An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric correction of Landsat 8. In: MIPPR 2015: Remote sensing image processing, geographic information systems, and other applications, vol 9815. SPIE, pp 128–135

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dozier J, Frew J (1981) Atmospheric corrections to satellite radiometric data over rugged terrain. Remote Sens Environ 11:191–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gao J (2009) Digital analysis of remotely sensed imagery. McGraw-Hill Education

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kneizys FX (1988) Users guide to LOWTRAN 7 (No. 1010). Air Force Geophysics Laboratory, United States Air Force

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lillesand T, Kiefer RW, Chipman J (2015) Remote sensing and image interpretation. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li Z, Duan P, Hu S, Li M, Kang X (2022) Fast hyperspectral image dehazing with dark-object subtraction model. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Letters

    Google Scholar 

  12. Moran MS, Jackson RD, Slater PN, Teillet PM (1992) Evaluation of simplified procedures for retrieval of land surface reflectance factors from satellite sensor output. Remote Sens Environ 41(2–3):169–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mustak S (2013) Correction of atmospheric haze in Resourcesat-1 Liss-4 Mx Data for urban analysis: an improved dark object subtraction approach. Int Arch Photogramm, Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 1:W3

    Google Scholar 

  14. Otterman J, Fraser RS (1976) Earth-atmosphere system and surface reflectivities in arid regions from Landsat MSS data. Remote Sens Environ 5:247–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Richter R (1990) A fast atmospheric correction algorithm applied to Landsat TM images. Title Remote Sens 11(1):159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rowan LC, Wetlaufer PH, Stewart JH (1976) Discrimination of rock types and detection of hydrothermally altered areas in south-central Nevada by the use of computer-enhanced ERTS images

    Google Scholar 

  17. Singh SM (1988) Estimation of multiple reflection and lowest order adjacency effects on remotely-sensed data. Int J Remote Sens 9(9):1433–1450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vapnik V (1999) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer science & business media

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vincent R (1973) An ERTS multispectral scanner experiment for map** iron compounds

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wicaksono P, Hafizt M (2018) Dark target effectiveness for dark-object subtraction atmospheric correction method on mangrove above-ground carbon stock map**. IET Image Proc 12(4):582–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riddick Kakati .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kakati, R., Dwivedy, S.K., Dutta, S. (2023). Development of a Fully Automated Atmospheric Correction Technique for Applications in Google Earth Engine. In: Dutta, S., Chembolu, V. (eds) Recent Development in River Corridor Management. RCRM 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 376. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4423-1_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4423-1_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-4422-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-4423-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation