Unpacking the Conceptualizations of Hayâ

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Handbook of Cultural Linguistics

Part of the book series: Springer Handbooks in Languages and Linguistics ((SHLL))

  • 71 Accesses

Abstract

Emotion is an important domain of human experience and is largely subject to categorization. Barrett (2006: 20) states that “[t]he experience of emotion is an act of categorization, guided by embodied knowledge about emotion”. Categorization is a basic cognitive activity (Polzenhagen and **a 2015) which starts in the early stages of life by setting up specific categories and is shaped gradually by the cultural environment and language. Cultural categorization (besides individual and institutional categorization) focuses on the categories that are shared by a cultural group and are associated with language (Glushko et al. 2008). In the framework of Cultural Linguistics (Sharifian 2011), cultural categories are considered as a sub-class of cultural conceptualizations, providing us with insightful data on the link between language and culture. Different languages give their speakers the tools to label their cultural categories which are often through lexical items and grammatical markers (Hercus 1994). To delve into the cultural categorization of shame (Hayâ) in Persian, we need to identify the emotion words associated with it. To this end, a corpus analysis was conducted, and Hayâ was identified as a sham-related lexeme in Persian. Before discussing Hayâ as a cultural category, it is noteworthy to rely on an argument proposed by Wierzbicka (1994) which describes an emotion word as an artefact of culture that cannot have exact equivalents in every language. Therefore, in this study, attempts were made to highlight the closest key words in English in translating Persian concepts: words that can best capture nuances of meanings and their conceptualizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abughosh BS, Shaqra WZ (1992) A glossary of Islamic terminology. Tā-Hā Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Aryanpour M (1984) The Ariyanpour progressive Persian-English Dictionary. Jahān-e Rāyāneh, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtiar M (2015) Cognitive model of GHEIRAT in Persian. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 2(2):257–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtiar M (2019) A cognitive linguistic view of control mechanism in Iranian culture: the case of ‘chastity’ in Persian. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17(2):465–496. Published Under the Auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett LF (2006) Are emotions natural kinds? Perspect Psychol Sci 1(1):28–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehkhoda AA (1998) Loghatnameh. University of Tehran, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan J (1976) Beyond morality: psychoanalytic reflections on Shame, Guilt and Love. In: Lickona INT (ed) Moral development and behavior: theory, research and social issues. Holt: Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Glushko RJ, Maglio PP, Matlock T, Barsalou LW (2008) Categorization in the wild. Trends Cogn Sci 12(4):129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hercus LA (1994) A Grammar of the Arabana-Wangkangurru Language Lake Eyre Basin, South Australia Pacific Linguistics series C-128. Australian National University, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Horzadeh MM (2004) Hayâ, an endless beauty. Shafagh, Ghom

    Google Scholar 

  • Naraghi A (1983) Merāj Al-sa’ādeh. Rashidi, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasandideh A (2004) Pazhuheshi dar farhang e haya. Dar al-Hadis, Ghom

    Google Scholar 

  • Polzenhagen F, **a X (2015) Language, culture, and prototypicality. In: Sharifian F (ed) The Routledge handbook of language and culture. Routledge, London/New York, pp 253–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Riss O, Woodhead L (2012) A psychology of religious emotion. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharifian F (2011) Cultural conceptualisations and language: theoretical framework and applications. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy EL (2018) Of trees, a son, and kingship: recovering an ancient Chinese dream. J Asian Stud, 77(3):593–609. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911818000517

  • Wierzbicka A (1994) Emotion, language and “cultural scripts”. In: Kitayama S, Markus H (eds) Emotion and culture: empirical studies of mutual influence. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 130–198

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ghazi, S. (2024). Unpacking the Conceptualizations of Hayâ. In: Korangy, A. (eds) The Handbook of Cultural Linguistics. Springer Handbooks in Languages and Linguistics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3800-1_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation