Interview Methods in Construction and Demolition Research: Based on Case Study and Recommended Best Practices

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate (CRIOCM 2022)

Abstract

Interview holds a prominent place among qualitative research methods, and it has been widely used in construction and demolition waste management research. Based on the literature review of interview-based related research, the status quo of interview applications is analyzed. Consequently, an interview guideline of interview-related methods is proposed according to the ratio between the number of interviewers and interviewees for effective implementation of interview methods. This paper classifies interview methods into four scenarios: Type I (one to one, 1:1), Type II (one to many, 1: n), Type III (many to one, m:1), and Type IV (many to many, m:n). Through a series of case studies, the application of the guide is demonstrated, and the corresponding best practices are summarized. Overall, this paper provides references for researchers to select the most appropriate interview method in construction and demolition waste research, and manage the interview process effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mocová, K.A., Sackey, L., Renkerová, P.: Environmental impact of concrete and concrete-based construction waste leachates. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 290, 012023 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Frey, J.H.: Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement: A.N. Oppenheim. Pinter publishers, London, 303 pp, (1992). Evaluation and Program Planning (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Banister, P.: Qualitative methods in psychology: a research guide. J. Psychosom. Res. 39(8), 1048–1049 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mishler, E.G., Press, H.U.: Research interviewing: context and narrative. Am. J. Sociol. 3, 192 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ely, M.: Doing qualitative research: circles within circles. Falmer Press 45(4), 335–342 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chadegani, A.A., et al.: A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases. MPRA Paper 9(5), 18–26 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Falagas, M., Pitsouni, E., Malietzis, G., Pappas, G.: Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 22(2), 338–342 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, H., Zuo, J., Zillante, G., Wang, J., Yuan, H.: Construction and demolition waste research: a bibliometric analysis. Archit. Sci. Rev. 62, 1–12 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yuan, H., Shen, L., Wang, J.: Major obstacles to improving the performance of waste management in China’s construction industry. Facilities 29(5–6), 224–242 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ma, M., Tam, V.W.Y., Le, K.N., Li, W.: Challenges in current construction and demolition waste recycling: a China study. Waste Manage. 118, 610–625 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yuan, H., Lu, W., Jianli, H.J.: The evolution of construction waste sorting on-site. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 20, 483–490 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsai, C.Y., Chang, A.S.: Framework for develo** construction sustainability items: the example of highway design. J. Clean. Prod. 20(1), 127–136 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thompson, J.D., Bashford, H.H.: Concrete recycling and utilization of recycled concrete: an investigation of the barriers and drivers within the Phoenix Metropolitan Area. In: Construction Research Congress (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lu, W., Yuan, H.: Exploring critical success factors for waste management in construction projects of China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 55(2), 201–208 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Poon, C.S., Yu, A.T.W., Wong, A., Yip, R.: Quantifying the impact of construction waste charging scheme on construction waste management in Hong Kong. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 139(5), 466–479 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Duan, H., Miller, T.R., Liu, G., Tam, V.: Construction debris becomes growing concern of growing cities. Waste Manage. 83(Jan), 1–5 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moisander, J., Valtonen, A.: Qualitative Marketing Research: A Cultural Approach. Sage, London (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Slocum, N.: Participatory Methods Toolkit, a Practitioner’s Manual. King Baudouin Foundation and the Flemish Institute for Science and Technology Assessment, Brussels (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Newnham, E., Small, K., Allen, J.: Critical ethnography in maternity care research: bridging creativity and rigour – a discussion paper. Midwifery 99, 103014 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2021.103014

  20. Ding, Z., Liu, R., Wang, Y., Tam, V.W.Y., Ma, M.: An agent-based model approach for urban demolition waste quantification and a management framework for stakeholders. J. Clean. Prod. 285, 124897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124897

  21. **, R., Yuan, H., Chen, Q.: Science map** approach to assisting the review of construction and demolition waste management research published between 2009 and 2018. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 140, 175–188 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Udawatta, N., Zuo, J., Chiveralls, K., Yuan, H., Zillante, G., Elmualim, A.: Major factors impeding the implementation of waste management in Australian construction projects. J. Green Build. 13(3), 101–121 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu, H., Zuo, J., Yuan, H., Zillante, G., Wang, J.: Cross-regional mobility of construction and demolition waste in Australia: an exploratory study. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 156, 104710 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Oyedele, L.O., Ajayi, S.O., Kadiri, K.O.: Use of recycled products in UK construction industry: an empirical investigation into critical impediments and strategies for improvement. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 93(93), 23–31 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Colin, M., Stegemann, J.A.: From waste management to component management in the construction industry. Sustainability 10, 229 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tam, V.W.Y., Le, K.N., Zeng, S.X.: Review on waste management systems in the Hong Kong construction industry: use of spectral and bispectral methods. J. Civil Eng. Manage. 18(1), 14–23 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kparnma, E.Z., Adjei-Kumi, T.: Management of waste in the building design process: the Ghanaian consultants’ perspective. Archit. Eng. Des. Manag. 7(2), 102–112 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sundin, E., Bjorkman, M., Eklund, M., Eklund, J., Engkvist, I.L.: Improving the layout of recycling centres by use of lean production principles. Waste Manage. 31(6), 1121–1132 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, J., Yuan, H., Kang, X., Lu, W.: Critical success factors for on-site sorting of construction waste: a China study. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 54(11), 931–936 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ogunmakinde, O.E., Sher, W., Maund, K.: An assessment of material waste disposal methods in the Nigerian construction industry. Recycling 4, 1–13 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tunji-Olayeni, P., Kajimo-Shakantu, K., Osunrayi, E.: Practitioners’ experiences with the drivers and practices for implementing sustainable construction in Nigeria: a qualitative assessment. Smart Sustain. Built Environ. 9(4), 443–465 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Akinade, O.O., et al.: Designing out construction waste using BIM technology: Stakeholders’ expectations for industry deployment. J. Clean. Prod. 180(Apr.10), 375–85 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lu, W., Lee, W., Bao, Z., Chi, B., Webster, C.: Cross-jurisdictional construction waste material trading: learning from the smart grid. J. Clean. Prod. 277, 123352 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123352

  34. Bao, Z., Lu, W., Chi, B., Hao, J.L.: Construction waste management performance in green building: contextualising LEED in China. Detritus 12, 125–134 (2020). https://doi.org/10.31025/2611-4135/2020.13992

  35. Yuan, H.: Barriers and countermeasures for managing construction and demolition waste: a case of Shenzhen in China. J. Clean. Prod. 157(Jul.20), 84–93 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kabirifar, K., Mojtahedi, M., Wang, C.C., Tam, V.Y.: Effective construction and demolition waste management assessment through waste management hierarchy; a case of Australian large construction companies. J. Clean. Prod. 312(6), 127790 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Negash, Y.T., Hassan, A.M., Tseng, M.L., Wu, K.J., Ali, M.H.: Sustainable construction and demolition waste management in Somaliland: regulatory barriers lead to technical and environmental barriers. J. Clean. Prod. 4, 126717 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lingard, H., Brown, K., Bradley, L., Bailey, C., Townsend, K.: Improving employees’ work-life balance in the construction industry: project alliance case study. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 133(10), 807–815 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wan, S., Kumaraswamy, M., Liu, D.: Dynamic modelling of building services projects: a simulation model for real-life projects in the Hong Kong construction industry. Math. Comput. Model. 57(9–10), 2054–2066 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Roulston, K.: Reflective Interviewing: A Guide to Theory and Practice. Sage, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Akinade, O.O., et al.: Design for Deconstruction (DfD): critical success factors for diverting end-of-life waste from landfills. Waste Manage. 60, 3–13 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hoang, N.H., et al.: Waste generation, composition, and handling in building-related construction and demolition in Hanoi Vietnam. Waste Manag. 117, 32–41 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bilal, M., et al.: Analysis of critical features and evaluation of BIM software: towards a plug-in for construction waste minimization using big data. Int. J. Sustain. Build. Technol. Urban Dev. 6(4), 211–218 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/2093761X.2015.1116415

  44. Ding, Z., Liu, R., Yuan, H.: A text mining-based thematic model for analyzing construction and demolition waste management studies. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28(24), 30499–30527 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13989-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bao, Z., Lee, W.M.W., Lu, W.: Implementing on-site construction waste recycling in Hong Kong: barriers and facilitators. Sci. Total Environ. 747, 141091 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tam. V.W.Y., Le, K.N., Zeng, S.X.: Review on waste management systems in the Hong Kong construction industry: use of spectral and bispectral methods/Atlieku tvarkymo sistemu Honkongo statybu sektoriuje apzvalga: spektrinio ir bispektrinio metodu taikymas: An examination of Sir William Hamilton’s philosophy and of the principal philosophical questions discussed in his writings. J. Civil. Eng. Manag. 18(1), 14–23 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2011.619326

  47. Hoang, N.H., Ishigaki, T., Kubota, R., Yamada, M., Kawamoto, K.: A review of construction and demolition waste management in Southeast Asia. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 22(2), 315–325 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-019-00914-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Turner, D.W., III.: Qualitative interview design: a practical guide for novice investigators. Qual. Rep. 15(3), 754 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was conducted with the support of the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No.71974132), Shenzhen Government Nature Science Foundation (Grant No. JCYJ20190808115809385), Shenzhen Natural Science Fund (the Stable Support Plan Program No.20220810160221001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.D.; Methodology, X.W.; Formal analysis, J.Z.; P.Z.; Investigation, X.W.; Data curation, X.W.; Writing—original draft preparation, X.W.; Writing—review and editing, J.Z, L.Y.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ** Yuan

  • Ethics declarations

    Conflicts of Interest

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    Copyright information

    © 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

    About this paper

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this paper

    Ding, Z., Wang, X., Zuo, J., Zou, P.W., Yuan, L. (2023). Interview Methods in Construction and Demolition Research: Based on Case Study and Recommended Best Practices. In: Li, J., Lu, W., Peng, Y., Yuan, H., Wang, D. (eds) Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. CRIOCM 2022. Lecture Notes in Operations Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3626-7_5

    Download citation

    Publish with us

    Policies and ethics

    Navigation