Jacobian-Free Newton-Krylov Method for Risk Identification

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Control and Optimization Methods for Complex System Resilience

Part of the book series: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control ((SSDC,volume 478))

Abstract

The identification of disruptive initial events on vulnerable components is crucial to the protection and reliability enhancement of critical infrastructure systems. Due to the evolving nature of system parameters and the complicated coupling relationship of different components, it has been a great challenge to identify the contingencies that could trigger cascading blackouts of power systems. This chapter aims to develop a generic approach for identifying the initial disruptive contingencies on vulnerable branches that can result in catastrophic cascading failures of power systems. Essentially, the problem of contingency identification is formulated in the mathematical framework of hybrid differential-algebraic system, and it can be solved by the Jacobian-Free Newton-Krylov (JFNK) method in order to circumvent the Jacobian matrix and relieve the computational burden. Moreover, an efficient numerical algorithm for contingency identification is developed to search for the disruptive disturbances that lead to catastrophic cascading failures with guaranteed convergence accuracy in theory. Finally, a case study is presented to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed identification approach on the IEEE test systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McLinn, J.: Major power outages in the US, and around the world. In: Annual Technology Report of IEEE Reliability Society (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Günther, B., Povh, D., Retzmann, D., Teltsch, E.: Global blackouts-lessons learned. In: Power-Gen Europe, vol. 28(30) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fang, Y., Pedroni, N., Zio, E.: Resilience-based component importance measures for critical infrastructure network systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 65(2), 502–512 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jovcic, D., Pillai, G.N.: Analytical modeling of TCSC dynamics. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 20(2), 1097–1104 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Song, J., et al.: Dynamic modeling of cascading failure in power systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 31(3), 2085–2095 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Almassalkhi, M.R., Hiskens, I.A.: Model-predictive cascade mitigation in electric power systems with storage and renewables-Part I: theory and implementation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 30(1), 67–77 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Taedong, K., Wright, S.J., Bienstock, D., Harnett, S.: Analyzing vulnerability of power systems with continuous optimization formulations. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 3(3), 132–146 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Yan, J., Tang, Y., He, H., Sun, Y.: Cascading failure analysis with DC power flow model and transient stability analysis. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 30(1), 285–297 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, H., Zhai, C., **ao, G., Pan, T.: Identifying critical risks of cascading failures in power systems. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.5667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, Q., McCalley, J.: Identifying high risk n\(-\)k contingencies for online security assessment. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 20(2), 823–834 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis, C.M., Overbye, T.J.: Multiple element contingency screening. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 26(3), 1294–1301 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Donde, V., Lopez, V., Lesieutre, B., Pinar, A., Yang, C., Meza, J.: Severe multiple contingency screening in electric power systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 23(2), 406–417 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bienstock, D., Verma, A.: The n\(-\)k problem in power grids: new models, formulations, and numerical experiments. SIAM J. Optimiz. 20(5), 2352–2380 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Rocco, C., Ramirez-Marquez, J., Salazar, D., Yajure, C.: Assessing the vulnerability of a power system through a multiple objective contingency screening approach. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 60(2), 394–403 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eppstein, M.J., Hines, P.D.: A “random chemistry’’ algorithm for identifying collections of multiple contingencies that initiate cascading failure. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 27(3), 1698–1705 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhai, C., Zhang, H., **ao, G., Pan, T.: An optimal control approach to identify the worst-case cascading failures in power systems. IEEE Trans. Control Netw. Syst. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCNS.2019.2930871

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Babalola, A.A., Belkacemi, R., Zarrabian, S.: Real-time cascading failures prevention for multiple contingencies in smart grids through a multi-agent system. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 9(1), 373–385 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cai, Y., Cao, Y., Li, Y., Huang, T., Zhou, B.: Cascading failure analysis considering interaction between power grids and communication networks. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 7(1), 530–538 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhai, C., Zhang, H., **ao, G., Pan, T.: A model predictive approach to preventing cascading failures of power systems. Int. J. Electr. Power Energ. Syst. 113, 310–321 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hines, P.D., Rezaei, P.: Cascading failures in power systems. In: Smart Grid Handbook, pp. 1–20 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mangasarian, O.L.: Nonlinear Programming. SIAM (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Knoll, D.A., Keyes, D.E.: Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov methods: a survey of approaches and applications. J. Comput. Phys. 193(2), 357–397 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Saad, Y., Martin, H.S.: GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 7(3), 856–869 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Brown, P.N., Saad, Y.: Hybrid Krylov methods for nonlinear systems of equations. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 11(3), 450–481 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Ortega, J.M., Rheinboldt, W.C.: Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables. SIAM, Philadelphia (2000)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Chan, T.F., Jackson, K.R.: Nonlinearly preconditioned Krylov subspace methods for discrete Newton algorithms. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 5, 533–542 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Zimmerman, R.D., Murillo-Sánchez, C.E., Thomas, R.J.: Matpower: steady-state operations, planning and analysis tools for power systems research and education. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 26(1), 12–19 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. PJM Relay Subcommittee, Protective Relaying Philosophy and Design Guidelines, 12 July 2018

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thorp, J., Phadke, A., Horowitz, S., Tamronglak, C.: Anatomy of power system disturbances: importance sampling. Int. J. Electr. Power Energ. Syst. 20(2), 147–152 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Paserba, J., et al.: A thyristor controlled series compensation model for power system stability analysis. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 10(3), 1471–1478 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Son, K.M., Park, J.K.: On the robust LQG control of TCSC for dam** power system oscillations. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 15(4), 1306–1312 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kundur, P., Balu, N.J., Lauby, M.G.: Power System Stability and Control, vol. 7. McGraw-hill, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao Zhai .

3.6 Appendix

3.6 Appendix

3.1.1 3.6.1 FACTS Devices

FACTS devices can greatly enhance the stability and transmission capability of power systems. As an effective FACTS device, TCSC has been widely installed to control the branch impedance and relieve system stresses. The dynamics of TCSC is described by a first order dynamical model [30]

$$\begin{aligned} T_{C,i}\frac{\text {d}{X}_{C,i}}{\text {d}t}=-X_{C,i}+X^{*}_{i}+u_i, \quad X_{\min ,i}\le X_{C,i}\le X_{\max ,i} \end{aligned}$$
(3.11)

where \(X^{*}_{i}\) refers to its reference reactance of Branch i for the steady power flow. \(X_{\min ,i}\) and \(X_{\max ,i}\) are the lower and upper bounds of the branch reactance \(X_{C,i}\) respectively and \(u_i\) represents the supplementary control input, which is designed to stabilize the disturbed power system [31]. For simplicity, PID controller is adopted to regulate the power flow on each branch

$$\begin{aligned} u_i(t)=K_P\cdot e_i(t)+K_I\cdot \int \limits _{0}^{t}e_i(\tau )\text {d}\tau +K_D\cdot \frac{\text {d}e_i(t)}{\text {d}t} \end{aligned}$$
(3.12)

where \(K_P\), \(K_I\) and \(K_D\) are tunable coefficients, and the error \(e_i(t)\) is given by

$$ e_i(t)=\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} P^{*}_{e,i}-|P_{e,i}(t)|, &{} |P_{e,i}(t)|\ge P^{*}_{e,i}; \\ 0, &{} \hbox {otherwise.} \end{array} \right. $$

Here, \(P^{*}_{e,i}\) and \(P_{e,i}(t)\) denote the reference power flow and the actual power flow on Branch i, respectively. Note that TCSC fails to function when the transmission line is severed.

3.1.2 3.6.2 HVDC Links

HVDC links work as a protective barrier to prevent the propagation of cascading outages in practice, and it is normally composed of a transformer, a rectifier, a DC line and an inverter. Actually, the rectifier terminal can be regarded as a bus with real power consumption \(P_{r}\), while the inverter terminal can be treated as a bus with real power generation \(P_{i}\). The direct current from the rectifier to the inverter is computed as follows [32]

$$ I_d=\frac{3\sqrt{3}(\cos \alpha -\cos \gamma )}{\pi (R_{cr}+R_L-R_{ci})}, $$

where \(\alpha \in [\pi /30,\pi /2]\) denotes the ignition delay angle of the rectifier, and \(\gamma \in [\pi /12,\pi /9]\) represents the extinction advance angle of the inverter. \(R_{cr}\) and \(R_{ci}\) refer to the equivalent communicating resistances for the rectifier and inverter, respectively. Additionally, \(R_L\) denotes the resistance of the DC transmission line. Thus the power consumption at the rectifier terminal is

$$\begin{aligned} P_r=\frac{3\sqrt{3}}{\pi }I_d\cos \alpha -R_{cr}I^2_d, \end{aligned}$$
(3.13)

and at the inverter terminal is

$$\begin{aligned} P_i=\frac{3\sqrt{3}}{\pi }I_d\cos \gamma -R_{ci}I^2_d=P_r-R_LI^2_d. \end{aligned}$$
(3.14)

Note that \(P_r\) and \(P_i\) keep unchanged when \(\alpha \) and \(\gamma \) are fixed.

3.1.3 3.6.3 Protective Relay

The protective relays are indispensable components in power systems protection and control. When the power flow exceeds the given threshold of the branch, the timer of circuit breaker starts to count down from the preset time [5]. Once the timer runs out of the preset time, the transmission line is severed by circuit breakers and its branch admittance becomes zero. Specifically, a step function is designed to reflect the physical characteristics of branch outage as follows

$$ g(P_{e,i},b_i)=\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 0, &{} |P_{e,i}|>b_i\hbox { and }t_c>T; \\ 1, &{} \hbox {otherwise.} \end{array} \right. $$

where T is the preset time of the timer in protective relays, and \(t_c\) denotes the counting time of the timer. In addition, \(P_{e,i}\) denotes the power flow on Branch i with the threshold \(b_i\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhai, C. (2023). Jacobian-Free Newton-Krylov Method for Risk Identification. In: Control and Optimization Methods for Complex System Resilience. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 478. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3053-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation