• 484 Accesses

Abstract

With the development of high-speed computing devices and advanced machine learning theories such as deep learning, end-to-end detection algorithms can be used to solve the problem of lane detection in a more efficient way. However, the key challenge for lane detection systems is to adapt to the demands of high reliability and diverse road conditions. An efficient way to construct a robust and accurate advanced lane detection system is to fuse multimodal sensors and integrate the lane detection system with other object detection systems. In this chapter, we briefly review traditional computer vision solutions and mainly focus on deep learning-based solutions for lane detection. Additionally, we also present a one-lane detection evaluation system, including offline and online systems. Finally, we use one lane detection algorithm and code to show how lane detection works in an autonomous driving system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. XING Y, LV C, CHEN L, et al. Advances in vision-based lane detection: algorithms, integration, assessment, and perspectives on ACP-based parallel vision. IEEE/CAA J. of Autom. Sinica, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 645-661, May 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  2. KANG D J, JUNG M H. Road lane segmentation using dynamic programming for active safety vehicles. Pattern Recogn. Lett., vol. 24, no. 16, pp. 3177-3185, Dec. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  3. SUDDAMALLA U, KUNDU S, FARKADE S, et al. A novel algorithm of lane detection addressing varied scenarios of curved and dashed lanemarks. in Proc. Int. Conf. Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA), Orleans, France, 2015, pp. 87-92.

    Google Scholar 

  4. COLLADO J M, HILARIO C, ESCALERA A, et al. Adaptative road lanes detection and classification. in Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Advanced Concepts for Intelligent Vision Systems, Springer, 2006, pp. 1151-1162.

    Google Scholar 

  5. SEHESTEDT S, KODAGODA S, ALEMPIJEVIC A, et al. Robust lane detection in urban environments. in Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Diego, CA, USA, 2007, pp. 123-128.

    Google Scholar 

  6. LIN Q, HAN Y, HAHN H. Real-time lane departure detection based on extended edge-linking algorithm. in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Computer Research and Development, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2010, pp. 725-730.

    Google Scholar 

  7. CELA A F, BERGASA L M, S’ANCHEZ F L, et al. Lanes detection based on unsupervised and adaptive classifier. in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Computational Intelligence, Communication Systems and Networks (CICSyN), Madrid, Spain, 2013, pp. 228-233.

    Google Scholar 

  8. BORKAR A, HAYES M, SMITH M T, et al. A layered approach to robust lane detection at night. in Proc. IEEE Workshop on Computational Intelligence in Vehicles and Vehicular Systems, Nashville, TN, USA, 2009, pp. 51-57.

    Google Scholar 

  9. KREUCHER C, LAKSHMANAN S. LANA: a lane extraction algorithm that uses frequency domain features. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 343-350, Apr. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. JUNG S, YOUN J, SULL S. Efficient lane detection based on spatiotemporal images. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 289-295, Jan. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  11. XIAO J, Li S T, SUN B. A real-time system for lane detection based on FPGA and DSP. Sens. Imag., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 6, Dec. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  12. OZGUNALP U, DAHNOUN N. Lane detection based on improved feature map and efficient region of interest extraction. in Proc. IEEE Global Conf. Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP), Orlando, FL, USA, 2015, pp. 923-927.

    Google Scholar 

  13. WANG Y, SHEN D G, TEOH E K. Lane detection using spline model. Pattern Recogn. Lett., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 67-689, Jul. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. WANG Y, TEOH E K, SHEN D G. Lane detection and tracking using B-Snake. Image Vis. Comput., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 269-280, Apr. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  15. LIM K H, SENG K P, ANG L M. River flow lane detection and Kalman filtering-based B-spline lane tracking. Int. J. Veh. Technol., vol. 2012, pp. 465819, Nov. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  16. JUNG C R, KELBER C R. An improved linear-parabolic model for lane following and curve detection. in Proc. 18th Brazilian Symp. Computer Graphics and Image Processing (SIBGRAPI’05), Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil, 2005, pp. 131-138.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aly M. Real time detection of lane markers in urban streets. in Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp., Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2008, pp. 7-12.

    Google Scholar 

  18. BORKAR A, HAYES M, SMITH M T. Robust lane detection and tracking with ransac and Kalman filter. in Proc. 16th IEEE Int. Conf. Image Processing (ICIP), Cairo, Egypt, 2009, pp. 3261-3264.

    Google Scholar 

  19. LOPEZ C, CANERO J, SERRAT J, et al. Detection of lane markings based on ridgeness and RANSAC. in Proc. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vienna, Austria, 2005, pp. 254-259.

    Google Scholar 

  20. CHEN Q, WANG H. A real-time lane detection algorithm based on a hyperbola-pair model. in Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp., Tokyo, Japan, 2006, pp. 510-515.

    Google Scholar 

  21. TAN H C, ZHOU Y, ZHU Y, et al. Improved river flow and random sample consensus for curve lane detection. Adv. Mech. Eng., vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 1-12, Jul. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  22. HUR J, KANG S N, SEO S W. Multilane detection in urban driving environments using conditional random fields. in Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp. (IV), Gold Coast, QLD, Australia, 2013, 1297-1302.

    Google Scholar 

  23. BOUNINI F, GINGRAS D, LAPOINTE V, et al. Autonomous vehicle and real time road lanes detection and tracking. in Proc. IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conf. (VPPC), Montreal, QC, Canada, 2015, pp. 1-6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. WU D Z, ZHAO R, WEI Z H, A multisegment lane-switch algorithm for efficient real time lane detection. in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Information and Automation, Hailar, China, 2014, pp. 273-278.

    Google Scholar 

  25. ZHOU S Y, JIANG Y H, XI J Q, Et al. A novel lane detection based on geometrical model and Gabor filter. in Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), San Diego, CA, USA, 2010, pp. 59-64.[g1] [jr2]

    Google Scholar 

  26. NIU J W, LU J. Et al, Robust lane detection using two stage feature extraction with curve fitting, Pattern Recogn, vol. 59, pp. 225-233, Nov 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  27. NEVEN D, BRABANDERE B, GEORGOULIS S, et al. Towards end-to-end lane detection: an instance segmentation approach. (2018). 286-291. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2018.8500547.

  28. HOU Y, MA Z, LIU C, et al. Learning lightweight lane detection cnns by self attention distillation. ar**v preprint ar**v:1908.00821, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  29. WANG Z, REN W Q, QIU Q, et al. LaneNet: Real-Time Lane Detection Networks for Autonomous Driving. ar**v preprint ar**v:1807.01726, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  30. LEE S, KIM J, YOON J S, et al. VPGNet: Vanishing point guided network for lane and road marking detection and recognition. In: Computer Vision (ICCV), 2017 IEEE International Conference on. pp. 1965-1973. IEEE, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  31. PAN X, SHI J, LUO P, et al. Spatial as deep: Spatial cnn for traffic scene understanding. ar**v preprint ar**v:1712.06080, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  32. OZGUNALP U, FAN R, AI X, et al. Multiple lane detection algorithm based on novel dense vanishing point estimation. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 621-632, Mar. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  33. BERTOZZI M, BROGGI A. GOLD: A parallel real-time stereo vision system for generic obstacle and lane detection. IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 62-81, Jan. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  34. LIPSKI B, SCHOLZ K, BERGER C, et al. A fast and robust approach to lane marking detection and lane tracking. in Proc. IEEE Southwest Symp. Image Analysis and Interpretation, Santa Fe, NM, USA, 2008, pp. 57-60.

    Google Scholar 

  35. KIM D, KIM B, CHUNG T, et al. Lane-level localization using an AVM camera for an automated driving vehicle in urban environments. IEEE/ASMETrans. Mechatron., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 280-290, Feb. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  36. JUNG H G, LEE Y H, KANG H J, et al. Sensor fusion-based lane detection for LKS+ACC system. Int. J. Automot. Technol., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 219-228, Apr. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  37. CUI X, XUE J R, ZHENG N N. Real-time global localization of robotic cars in lane level via lane marking detection and shape registration. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1039-1050, Apr. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  38. JIANG Y, GAO F, XU G H. Computer vision-based multiple-lane detection on straight road and in a curve. in Proc. Int. Conf. Image Analysis and Signal Processing (IASP), Zhejiang, China, 2010, pp. 114-117.

    Google Scholar 

  39. SCHREIBER M, KNOPPEL C, FRANKE U. Laneloc: Lane marking based localization using highly accurate maps. in Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp. (IV), Gold Coast, QLD, Australia, 2013, pp. 449-454.

    Google Scholar 

  40. CLANTON J M, BEVLY D M, HODEL A S. A low-cost solution for an integrated multisensor lane departure warning system,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 47-59, Mar. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  41. SHIN S, SHIM I, KWEON I S. Combinatorial approach for lane detection using image and LIDAR reflectance. in Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence (URAI), Goyang, South Korea, 2015, pp. 485-487.

    Google Scholar 

  42. AMARADI P, SRIRAMOJU N, DANG L, et al. Lane following and obstacle detection techniques in autonomous driving vehicles. in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Electro Information Technology (EIT), Grand Forks, ND, USA, 2016, pp. 674-679.

    Google Scholar 

  43. HUANG S, MOORE D, ANTONE M, et al. Finding multiple lanes in urban road networks with vision and lidar,” Auton. Robots, vol. 26, no. 2-3, pp. 103-122, Apr. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  44. BORKAR A, HAYES M, SMITH M T. A novel lane detection system with efficient ground truth generation. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 365-374, Mar. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  45. LOPEZ J, SERRAT C, CA˜NERO F, et al. Robust lane markings detection and road geometry computation. Int. J. Automot. Technol., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 395-407, Jun. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  46. ROSE C, BRITT J, ALLEN J, et al. An integrated vehicle navigation system utilizing lane-detection and lateral position estimation systems in difficult environments for GPS. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 2615-2629, Dec. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  47. LIN W, WANG H Y, TSENG D C. A robust lane detection and verification method for intelligent vehicles. in Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. Intelligent Information Technology Application, Shanghai, China, vol. 1, pp. 521-524, Nov. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  48. MCCALL J C, TRIVEDI M M. Video-based lane estimation and tracking for driver assistance: Survey, system, and evaluation. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 20-37, Mar. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  49. LABAYRADE R, DOURET J, LANEURIT J, et al. A reliable and robust lane detection system based on the parallel use of three algorithms for driving safety assistance. IEICE Trans. Inform. Syst., vol. E89-D, no. 7, pp. 2092-2100, Jul. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  50. YOO J H, LEE S W, PARK S K, et al. A robust lane detection method based on vanishing point estimation using the relevance of line segments. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 3254-3266, Dec. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  51. LI L, HUANG W L, LIU Y H. et al. Intelligence testing for autonomous vehicles: A new approach. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 158-166, Jun. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  52. VEIT T, TAREL J P, NICOLLE P, et al. Evaluation of road marking feature extraction. in Proc. 11th Int. IEEE Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems, Bei**g, China, 2008, pp. 174-181.

    Google Scholar 

  53. MCCALL J C, TRIVEDI M M. Performance evaluation of a vision based lane tracker designed for driver assistance systems. in Proc. Intelligent Vehicles Symp., Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2005, pp. 153-158.

    Google Scholar 

  54. SATZODA R K, TRIVEDI M M. On performance evaluation metrics for lane estimation. in Proc. 22nd Int. Conf. Pattern Recognition, Stockholm, Sweden, 2014, pp. 2625-2630.

    Google Scholar 

  55. KO YEONGMIN, LEE YOUNKWAN, Et al, Key Points Estimation and Point Instance Segmentation Approach for Lane Detection[g3], IEEE Transaction on Intelligent Transportation System, June 2021, pp. 1-10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ren, J., **a, D. (2023). Lane Detection. In: Autonomous driving algorithms and Its IC Design. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2897-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation