Abstract
This work contributes to the clarification through an assessment study with aim of showing the difference in electrical production between the monofacial photovoltaic system and bifacial photovoltaic system in Tamanrasset site, located in the desert south of Algeria as well as determining the electrical load factor to each day of the year of each system. The power of the photovoltaic field used in our simulation is estimated at 10 MWp. In the electrical evaluation, it is based on four inclinations and orientation configuration of the photovoltaic modules, knowing that the photovoltaic systems consist of solar panels of the same electrical power, and the rest of the equipment are of the same type. The parameters of the field tilt angle are as follows: The first variant is composed of the monofacial module 400 Wp installed with tilt of 36°, and the second variant is composed of the bifacial module 400 Wp fixed with three different tilt angles (36°, 90°, and 90° east–west). The most important results of my study are as follows: The energy production of the first variant is 19202 MWh/year and the peak load factor is about 24.87% in February, the second variant is 19174 MWh/year and the peak load factor is about 24.83% in February, for the third variant, it is 10384MWh/year and the peak load factor is about 19.66% in December, and for the last variant is 10501 MWh/year and the peak load factor is about 13.54% in May. Finally, the results of this study showed that the load factor percentage is less than 25% for the four configurations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
N. Rosenberg, The role of electricicty in industrial development. Energy J. 19(2), 7–24 (1998)
H. Gustafsson, Electricity for developtnent: problems and prospects in equipment acquisition. Econ. Polit. Wkly. 14(27), 1127–1131 (2013)
A. Boudghene Stambouli, Algerian renewable energy assessment: the challenge of sustainability, Energy Policy, 39(8), 4507–4519, (2011)
K. Abdeladim et al., Renewable energies in Algeria : current situation and perspectives. 29th Eur. Photovolt. Sol. Energy Conf. Exhib. Renew. no. September (2014), p. 2014
A. Jäger-Waldau, PV Status Report 2019 (2019)
R. Guerrero-Lemus, R. Vega, T. Kim, A. Kimm, L.E. Shephard, Bifacial solar photovoltaics—A technology review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 60, 1533–1549 (2016)
S. Dittmann, S. Krause, J. Bagdahn, H. Park, S.-Y. Oh, S. Esefelder, Characterization of bifacial pv mini-modules using front- and double-side illumination. 35th EUPVSEC Oct 2018
G. Razongles et al., Bifacial photovoltaic modules: measurement challenges. Energy Procedia 92, 188–198 (2016)
G. Masson, I. Kaizuka, IEA PVPS Report—Trends in Photovoltaic Applications (2020)
J.S. Stein et al., Bifacial PV Modules & Systems Experience and results from International Research and Pilot Applications (2021)
C. Duran, Bifacial solar cells : High efficiency design, characterization, modules and applications. Dissertation 130 (2012)
Y. Muñoz, V. Orlando, P. Gustavo, V. Jairo, Sizing and study of the energy production of a grid-tied photovoltaic system using PV syst software. Tecciencia 12(22), 27–32 (2016)
A. Alnoosani, M. Oreijah, M. Alhazmi, Y. Samkari, H. Faqeha, Design of 100 MW Solar PV on-grid connected power plant using (PVsyst) in Umm Al-Qura University. Int. J. Sci. Res. 8(11), 356–363 (2018)
A.A.A. Al-khazzar, A theoretical detailed analysis for a proposed 5 kW PV grid-connected system installed in Iraq using PVsyst Tool. Iranica J. Energy Environ. 9(2), 105–113 (2018)
A. Mermoud, optimization of row-arrangement in Pv systems, shading loss evaluations according to module positioning and connexions, in 27th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference–Frankfurt, Ger. 24–28 Sept. 2012 Optim., no. September (2012) pp. 57–77
P. Ineichen, P. Ineichen, Global irradiation : average and typical year, and year to year annual variability (Sept 2011)
P. Ineichen, Five satellite products deriving beam and global irradiance validation on data from 23 ground stations, Univ. Geneva, Feb 2011
Hukseflux, How to calculate PV performance ratio and performance index, http://www.hukseflux.com/applications/solar-energy-pv-system-performance-monitoring/how-to-calc (Feb 2017), pp. 1–4
B.M.W.G.J.H.M. van Sark N.H. Reich, Review of PV performance ratio development, Conference. World Renew. Energy Forum, WREF 2012, Incl. World Renew. Energy Congr. XII Color. Renew. Energy Soc. (2012)
A.M. Khalid, I. Mitra, W. Warmuth, V. Schacht, Performance ratio—Crucial parameter for grid connected PV plants. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 65, 1139–1158 (2016)
Z. Usman, J. Tah, H. Abanda, C. Nche, A critical appraisal of PV-systems performance, 1–22 (2020)
G.P. Watkins, A third factor in the variation of productivity : the load factor source. Am. Econ. Rev. 5(4), 753–786 (Dec, 1915 ). Published by : American Economic Associate
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Toufik, Z., Mohammed, A. (2024). Load Factor of Electrical Energy Production of Monofacial and Bifacial Photovoltaic System in Desert of Algeria. In: Mellit, A., Belmili, H., Seddik, B. (eds) Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Advanced Renewable Energy Systems. ICARES 2022. Springer Proceedings in Energy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2777-7_49
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2777-7_49
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-2776-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-2777-7
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)