The Promise and Potential of One Planet Living

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Urban Transitions

Part of the book series: Urban Sustainability ((US))

  • 248 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores the One Planet Living (OPL) framework for sustainable urban development. The OPL Framework is a system of principles and tools for the design, planning and building of new sustainable residential mixed use urban communities, including zero carbon and zero waste objectives. To put progressive climate change mitigation strategies into practice, the OPL framework was first implemented and tested in the BedZed development in England over 25 years ago. Since then, it has been applied to dozens of new construction and development projects worldwide. We begin by introducing the OPL and presenting several case studies of OPL in practice from around the world. We then situate the OPL framework within the broader literature on sustainable urban development to illustrate the promise and potential of this unique approach to construction and development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bayulken B, Huisingh D (2015) A literature review of historical trends and emerging theoretical approaches for develo** sustainable cities (part 1). J Clean Prod 109:11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berardi U (2013) Sustainability assessment of urban communities through rating systems. Environ Dev Sustain 15(6):1573–1591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bioregional (2016) BedZED: the story of a pioneering eco-village. https://www.bioregional.com/resources/bedzed-the-story-of-a-pioneering-eco-village

  4. Bioregional (2019) One Planet Living goals and guidance for communities and destinations

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bioregional (2021) WGV one planet annual review 2021. https://www.bioregional.com/resources/wgv-one-planet-annual-review-2021

  6. Bioregional (2022) One Planet Living. https://www.bioregional.com/one-planet-living

  7. BRE Global Limited (2012) BREEAM communities technical manual 2012. https://files.bregroup.com/breeam/technicalmanuals/communitiesmanual/#resources/otherformats/output/10_pdf/20_a4_pdf_screen/sd202_breeam_communities_1.2_screen.pdf

  8. Building and Construction Authority (BCA) Singapore (2016) BCA green mark for districts. https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/docs-corp-buildsg/sustainability/gm_district_v2_1.pdf

  9. Byrne J, Law A, Hosking R, Breadsell J, Syed M, Babaeff T, Morrison G, Newman P (2019) Mainstreaming low carbon residential precincts—The WGV living laboratory. Cooperative Research Centre for Low Carbon Living, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cabanek A, Zingoni de Baro ME, Byrne J, Newman P (2021) Regenerating stormwater infrastructure into biophilic urban assets. Case studies of a Sump Garden and a Sump Park in Western Australia. Sustainability 13(10):5461

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities (CRSWSC) (2017) White Gum Valley case study: a waterwise way of living. https://watersensitivecities.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Case_Study_White_Gum_Valley.pdf

  12. Desai P (2008) Creating low carbon communities: One Planet Living solutions. Globalizations 5(1):67–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. DevelopmentWA (2019) WGV overview. https://developmentwa.com.au/projects/residential/white-gum-valley/overview

  14. Ferwati MS, Al Saeed M, Shafaghat A, Keyvanfar A (2019) Qatar sustainability assessment system (QSAS)-neighborhood development (ND) assessment model: coupling green urban planning and green building design. J Build Eng 22:171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gerhards J (2021) One Planet Living and the legitimacy of sustainability governance: from standardised information to regenerative systems. PhD thesis University of Westminster School of Social Sciences https://doi.org/10.34737/vq22y

  16. Gerhards J, Greenwood D (2021) One Planet Living and the legitimacy of sustainability governance: from standardised information to regenerative systems. J Clean Prod 313:127895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. German Sustainable Building Council (DGNB) (2022) DGNB systems: planning and certification of sustainable districts. https://www.dgnb-system.de/en/districts/

  18. Gibbons LV (2020) Regenerative—The new sustainable? Sustainability 12(13):5483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Global Sustainability Assessment System (GSAS) (2019) GSAS 2019 design & build assessment manual. https://gsas.gord.qa/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/GSAS-2019-Design-and-Build-Assessment-Manual-for-Building-Typologies.pdf

  20. Georgescu M, Morefield PE, Bierwagen BG, Weaver CP (2014) Urban adaptation can roll back warming of emerging megapolitan regions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(8):2909–2914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Green Building Council Australia (GBCA) (2016) Green Star Communities National framework. https://gbca-web.s3.amazonaws.com/media/documents/green-star---communitiesframework-final.pdf

  22. Hancock T, Desai P, Patrick R (2020) Tools for creating a future of healthy One Planet cities in the Anthropocene. Cities Health 4(2):180–192. https://www.bioregional.com/resources/one-planet-living-goals-and-guidance-for-communities

  23. Japan Sustainable Building Consortium (JSBC) (2014) Comprehensive Assessment System for Built Environment Efficiency (CASBEE) for urban development. https://www.ibec.or.jp/CASBEE/english/download/CASBEE-UDe_2014manual.pdf.

  24. Joss S, Cowley R, Tomozeiu D (2013) Towards the ‘ubiquitous eco-city’: an analysis of the internationalisation of eco-city policy and practice. Urban Res Pract 6(1):54–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Joss S, Rydin Y (2018) Prospects for standardising sustainable urban development. In: Bell S, Morse S (eds) Routledge handbook of sustainability indicators. Routledge, pp 364–378

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Mazutis D, Abolina E (2019) The Five I model of sustainability leadership: lessons from the Zibi One Planet Living sustainable urban development. J Clean Prod 237:117799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mazutis D, Sweet L (2022) The business of accelerating sustainable urban development: a systematic review and synthesis. J Clean Prod 131871

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rasoolimanesh SM, Badarulzaman N, Abdullah A, Behrang M (2019) How governance influences the components of sustainable urban development? J Clean Prod 238:117983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharifi A, Murayama A (2013) A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. Environ Impact Assess Rev 38:73–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tanguay GA, Rajaonson J, Lefebvre JF, Lanoie P (2010) Measuring the sustainability of cities: an analysis of the use of local indicators. Ecol Ind 10(2):407–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Turcu C (2018) Sustainability indicators and certification schemes for the built environment. In: Bell S, Morse S (eds) Routledge handbook of sustainability indicators. Routledge, pp 156–175

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Twinn C (2003) BedZED. Arup J 38(1):10–16

    Google Scholar 

  33. United Nations Environment Programme & International Energy Agency (UN-EIEA) (2017) Towards a zero-emission, efficient, and resilient buildings and construction sector: global status report 2017. https://www.worldgbc.org/sites/default/files/UNEP%20188_GABC_en%20%28web%29.pdf

  34. United States Green Building Council (USGBC) (2013) LEED v4 impact category and point allocation process overview. https://www.usgbc.org/resources/leed-v4-impact-category-and-point-allocation-process-overview

  35. Waddock S, Meszoely GM, Waddell S, Dentoni D (2015) The complexity of wicked problems in large scale change. J Organ Change Manag 28(6):993–1012

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wiktorowicz J, Babaeff T, Breadsell J, Byrne J, Eggleston J, Newman P (2018) WGV: an Australian urban precinct case study to demonstrate the 1.5 C agenda including multiple SDGs. Urban Plan 3(2):64–81

    Google Scholar 

  37. **a B, Chen Q, Skitmore M, Zuo J, Li M (2015) Comparison of sustainable community rating tools in Australia. J Clean Prod 109:84–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zibi (2022) Zibi 2021 One Planet report. https://zibi.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/2021-One-Planet-report_ENG-FINAL.pdf

  39. Zibi (n.d.) Zibi development website. https://zibi.ca/about/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daina Mazutis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Manivannan, A., Mazutis, D. (2023). The Promise and Potential of One Planet Living. In: Allam, Z. (eds) Sustainable Urban Transitions. Urban Sustainability. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2695-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2695-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-2694-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-2695-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation