Abstract
A growing number of students demand knowledge on more sustainable practices and climate change actions from their education. This chapter argues that although Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) can be hard to implement and put into practice, geographical fieldwork methods are well suited to the study of planning implementation efforts. The chapter is based on a case study of students’ perceptions of a former wetland in a Danish nature park. The study finds environmental blindness among students’ SDG strategies, not least when it comes to understanding the multi-scalar character of the SDGs and their assessment of the (dis)proportionality between different planning proposals, landowners’ and citizens’ natural-cultural representation of the area, and potential effects for more sustainable land transformation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bednarz R (2006) Environmental research and education in US geography. Journal Geography Higher Education 30(2):237–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260600717315
Brost BD, Bradley KA (2006) Student compliance with assigned reading: a case study. J Scholarsh Teach Learn 6(3):101–111
Castree N (2015) The anthropocene: a primer for geographers. Geography 100(2):66–75
Castree N, Braun B (Ed.) (2001). Social nature: theory, practice and politics. Blackwell Ltd.
Demirci A, De Miguel GR, Bednarz SW (2018) Geography education for global understanding. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77216-5Cham.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Environment (2021) EU biodiversity strategy for 2030: bringing nature back into our lives. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2779/048. Accessed 4 Nov 2022
European Commission, EU-CAP, Common Agricultural Policy (2021) The Danish strategic CAP plan 2023–2027.
Gould P (1999) Becoming a geographer. Syracuse University Press, New York
Graff ED, Kolmos A (2003) Characteristics of problem-based learning. Int J Eng Educ 19(5):657–662
Grindsted TS (2018a) Geoscience and sustainability—in between keywords and buzzwords. Geoforum 91:57–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.029
Grindsted, TS., Nielsen, TT. (2022) Spaces of learning—practising the SDGs through geographical fieldwork methods in a nature park. Int J Sustain Higher Edu 23(8) 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-04-2021-0132
Grindsted TS (2018b) Regional planning, sustainability goals and the Mitch-match between educational practice and climate, energy and business plans. J Clean Prod 171:1681–1690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.197
Holm J, Cold-Ravnkilde S, Grindsted TS (2020) Borgernes Stemme: Udfordringer og ønsker til fremtidens naturpark. Roskilde University.
Holmes, E. (2022). Map of the Åmose water system and Lille Åmose, and the student case area. Roskilde University
Hope M (2009) The importance of direct experience: a philosophical defense of fieldwork in human geography. J Geogr High Educ 33(2):169–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260802276698
Huckle J (2002) Reconstructing nature: towards a geographical education for sustainabledevelopment. Geography 87(1):64–72. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40573638
Hulme M (2008) Geographical work at the boundaries of climate change. Trans Inst Br Geogr 33(1):5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00289.x
Jakobsen NB (2006) Industrial symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: a quantitative assessment of economic and environmental aspects. J Ind Ecol 10(1–2):239–255. https://doi.org/10.1162/108819806775545411
Jose S, Patrick PG, Moseley C (2017) Experiential learning theory: the importance of outdoor classrooms in environmental education. Int J Sci Educ 7(3):269–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2016.1272144
Klimarådet (2020) Kulstofholdige Lavbundsjorde. The Danish Council on Climate Change.
Krauss KW, Zhu Z, Stagg CL (2021) Managing wetlands to improve carbon sequestration. Eos 102. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EO215004
Liverman DM (2018) Geographic perspectives on development goals: constructive engagements and critical perspectives on the MDGs and the SDGs. Dialogues in Human Geography 8(2):168–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820618780787
Lundhede T, Hasler B, Bille T (2005) Værdisætning af naturgenopretning og bevarelse i Store Åmose I Vestsjælland. Skov og Naturstyrelsen, Miljøministeriet. https://mst.dk/media/mst/Attachments/aamoserapport_vaerdi_nylow.pdf
Mammadova A (2019) Sustainable development goals as educational tools to raise students’ awareness of the rural development of biosphere reserves: a case study of Mount Hakusan Biosphere. Business Strategy & Development 3(2):195–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.88
Mansfield B (2009) Sustainability. In Castree N, Demeritt D, Livermann D et al (eds) A companion to environmental geography. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA
Massey D (2005) For space. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
McLuhan M (1966) Understanding media: The extension of man. McGraw-Hill, New York & London
Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J et al (1972) The limits to growth. Club of Rome, Universe Books, New York
Meadows ME (2020) Geography education for sustainable development. Geography and Sustainability 1(1):88–92
Ministry of Environment (2006) Hvidsbog over høringssvar og ministerbesvarelser vedr. Skitseprojektering af naturgenopretningsprojekt I den østlige del af Åmosen. Miljøministeriet. https://naturstyrelsen.dk/media/nst/attachments/79356/hvidbog_samlet.pdf (In Danish).
Ministry of Environment (2022) Moser, areal og fordeling. https://mst.dk/media/114356/mose.pdf. Accessed 4 Nov 2022
Nahlik AM, Fennessy MS (2016) Carbon storage in US wetlands. Nature Communications 7 (13835). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13835
Naturpark Åmosen (2019) Naturpark Åmosen. http://naturparkaamosen.dk/. Accessed 2 Nov 2022
Nightingale A (2018) Geography’s contribution to the sustainable development goals: ambivalence and performance, commentary. Dialogues in Human Geography 8(2):196–200
Noe-Nygaard N, Abildstrup CH, Albrechtsen T et al (1998) Palæobiologiske, sedimentologiske og geokemiske undersøgelser af Sen Weichsel og Holocæne aflejringer i Store Åmose, Danmark. Geologisk Tidsskrift 2: 1–65. https://2dgf.dk/xpdf/gt1998-2-1-65.pdf
Patterson J, Wyborn C, Westman L et al (2021) The political effects of emergency frames in sustainability. Nat Sustain 4:841–850. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00749-9
Rampasso IS, Siqueira RG, Martins VWB et al (2021) Implementing social projects with undergraduate students: an analysis of essential characteristics. Int J Sustain High Educ 22(1):198–214. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-11-2019-0323
Ricaurte LF, Olaya-Rodríguez MH, Cepeda-Valencia J et al (2017) Future impacts of drivers of change on wetland ecosystem services in Colombia. Glob Environ Chang 44:158–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha
Salvia AL, Filho W, Brandli LL et al (2019) Assessing research trends related to sustainable development goals: local and global issues. J Clean Prod 208:841–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.242
Steffen W, Grinevald J, Crutzen P et al (2011) The anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 369(1938):842–867. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0327
Stokes A, Magnier K, Weaver R (2011) What is the use of fieldwork? conceptions of students and staff in geography and geology. J Geogr High Educ 35(1):121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2010.487203
Swyngedouw E (1997) Neither global nor local: ‘glocalization’ and the politics of scale. In: Cox KR (ed) Spaces of globalization: reasserting the power of the local. Guilford Press, New York and London, pp 137–166
Widener JM, Gliedt T, Tziganuk A (2016) Assessing sustainability teaching and learning in geography education. Int J Sustain High Educ 17(5):698–718
** Y, Peng S, Ciais P (2021) Future impacts of climate change on inland Ramsar wetlands. Nature Climste Change 11(1):45–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00942-2
Yarnal B, Neff R (2004) Whither parity? the need for a comprehensive curriculum in human environment geography. Prof Geogr 56(1):28–36
Yli-Panula E, Jeronen E, Lemmetty P (2020) Teaching and learning methods in geography promoting sustainability. Educ Sci 10 (1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10010005
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Nordea Foundation for financial support. Also, I would like to thank Esbern Holmes, Roskilde University, Department of People and Technology for production of Map in Fig. 14.1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grindsted, T.S. (2023). Practicing Students SDG Strategies Through Fieldwork—Exploring Student Perspectives on Green Urban Planning Models in a Nature Park. In: Muñiz Solari, O., Schrüfer, G. (eds) Understanding Sustainability with Pedagogical Practice. Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2687-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2687-9_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-2686-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-2687-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)