• 66 Accesses

Abstract

Overall, western philosophy has witnessed two significant turns. The first is the epistemological turn from the seventeenth century onwards, with Rene Descartes’ philosophy as the turning point. In essence, it is the shift from an ontological inquiry into the origin of the world to an epistemological inquiry into “how man gets to know”. Since then, reason had gained its supremacy in philosophy. The second is the linguistic turn that took place at the beginning of the twentieth century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chang, An, and Mingxin Zhu. 2003. “Linguistics diversion of law” and its inspiration to methodology of law linguistics research in our country. Journal of Qiongzhou University 3: 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Tenglan. 2000. On the research methods of Western legal language. Fudan Journal (Social Sciences Edition) 2: 102–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Jiong. 2004. A research commentary on China legal languages of more than twenty years. Journal of Guizhou University of Engineering Science 1: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulthard, M. 2013. On the use of corpora in the analysis of forensic texts. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law 1: 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, **aobo. 2006. Jurisprudent analysis on fuzziness in Chinese legislative languages. Applied Linguistics 4:82- 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, Yanlin, and Wenxian Zhang. 2001. The postmodern method and the turn of the study of law. **ling Law Review 1: 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleson, R. 1994. Forensic analysis of personal written texts: A case study. In Language and the law, ed. J. Gibbons. London: Longman Group UK Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1999. Truth and method (volume I). Trans. Hong Handing. Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, Terence. 1987. Structuralism and semiotics, trans. Qu Tiepeng. Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Zhiqing. 2002. Forensic linguistics and four fields of linguistic expertise. Contemporary Linguistics 2: 115–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Haijuan. 2004. A survey of studies on courtroom discourse. Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies 1: 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Wenyi. 2000. Introduction to philosophy of law. Chinese Journal of Law 5: 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentineg, G., and R. Shuy. 1990. Meaning in the marketplace. American Speech 65 (4): 349–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Qirui. 2005. Legal research and methodology. **an: Shandong People’s Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Meizhen. 2004. A review of study of forensic linguistics abroad. Contemporary Linguistics 6: 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Weiming. 2003. Forensic linguistics research. Bei**g: Economic Press China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv, Shilun. 1999. Schools of the modern western jurisprudence, vol. I. Bei**g: Encyclopedia of China Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryuichi, Nakayama, and Yongsheng Zhou. 2000. Model transition of jurisprudence in the 20th century. Foreign Law Translation and Review 3: 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Zongling. 1983. Perelman’s legal thought of “new rhetoric.” Chinese Journal of Law 5: 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuy, R. 2001. Discourse analysis in the legal context. In The handbook of discourse analysis. London: Oxford Blackwell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Youhuai. 1985. Brief of handling cases (annotated by Chinese teaching and research section, east China University of political science and law). Bei**g: Qunzhong Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • **e, Hui. 2003. Science and interpretation: Two methods of legal philosophy research. Science of Law 1: 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • **n, Bin. 2004. On the philosophical and sociological background of critical linguistics. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching 8 (1–3): 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Wenxian. 1996. Research on the trend of Western legal philosophy thoughts in the 20th century. Bei**g: Law Press·China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Qiang. 2000. General observation on postmodern jurisprudence in USA. Foreign Law Translation and Review 2: 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Wan**. 1997. An introduction to sociolinguistics. Changsha: Hunan Education Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to **aobo Dong .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dong, X., Zhang, Y. (2023). Research on Legal Language. In: On the Standardization of Chinese Legislative Language. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2633-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2633-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-2632-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-2633-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation