Abstract
Overall, western philosophy has witnessed two significant turns. The first is the epistemological turn from the seventeenth century onwards, with Rene Descartes’ philosophy as the turning point. In essence, it is the shift from an ontological inquiry into the origin of the world to an epistemological inquiry into “how man gets to know”. Since then, reason had gained its supremacy in philosophy. The second is the linguistic turn that took place at the beginning of the twentieth century.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chang, An, and Mingxin Zhu. 2003. “Linguistics diversion of law” and its inspiration to methodology of law linguistics research in our country. Journal of Qiongzhou University 3: 63–68.
Chen, Tenglan. 2000. On the research methods of Western legal language. Fudan Journal (Social Sciences Edition) 2: 102–108.
Chen, Jiong. 2004. A research commentary on China legal languages of more than twenty years. Journal of Guizhou University of Engineering Science 1: 1–4.
Coulthard, M. 2013. On the use of corpora in the analysis of forensic texts. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law 1: 27–43.
Dong, **aobo. 2006. Jurisprudent analysis on fuzziness in Chinese legislative languages. Applied Linguistics 4:82- 87.
Du, Yanlin, and Wenxian Zhang. 2001. The postmodern method and the turn of the study of law. **ling Law Review 1: 30–36.
Eagleson, R. 1994. Forensic analysis of personal written texts: A case study. In Language and the law, ed. J. Gibbons. London: Longman Group UK Limited.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1999. Truth and method (volume I). Trans. Hong Handing. Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House.
Hawkes, Terence. 1987. Structuralism and semiotics, trans. Qu Tiepeng. Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House.
Hu, Zhiqing. 2002. Forensic linguistics and four fields of linguistic expertise. Contemporary Linguistics 2: 115–118.
Hu, Haijuan. 2004. A survey of studies on courtroom discourse. Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies 1: 8–11.
Huang, Wenyi. 2000. Introduction to philosophy of law. Chinese Journal of Law 5: 3–16.
Lentineg, G., and R. Shuy. 1990. Meaning in the marketplace. American Speech 65 (4): 349–366.
Li, Qirui. 2005. Legal research and methodology. **an: Shandong People’s Publishing House.
Liao, Meizhen. 2004. A review of study of forensic linguistics abroad. Contemporary Linguistics 6: 66–76.
Liu, Weiming. 2003. Forensic linguistics research. Bei**g: Economic Press China.
Lv, Shilun. 1999. Schools of the modern western jurisprudence, vol. I. Bei**g: Encyclopedia of China Publishing House.
Ryuichi, Nakayama, and Yongsheng Zhou. 2000. Model transition of jurisprudence in the 20th century. Foreign Law Translation and Review 3: 13–27.
Shen, Zongling. 1983. Perelman’s legal thought of “new rhetoric.” Chinese Journal of Law 5: 75–80.
Shuy, R. 2001. Discourse analysis in the legal context. In The handbook of discourse analysis. London: Oxford Blackwell Press.
Wang, Youhuai. 1985. Brief of handling cases (annotated by Chinese teaching and research section, east China University of political science and law). Bei**g: Qunzhong Publishing House.
**e, Hui. 2003. Science and interpretation: Two methods of legal philosophy research. Science of Law 1: 3–14.
**n, Bin. 2004. On the philosophical and sociological background of critical linguistics. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching 8 (1–3): 25.
Zhang, Wenxian. 1996. Research on the trend of Western legal philosophy thoughts in the 20th century. Bei**g: Law Press·China.
Zheng, Qiang. 2000. General observation on postmodern jurisprudence in USA. Foreign Law Translation and Review 2: 44–53.
Zhu, Wan**. 1997. An introduction to sociolinguistics. Changsha: Hunan Education Publishing House.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dong, X., Zhang, Y. (2023). Research on Legal Language. In: On the Standardization of Chinese Legislative Language. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2633-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2633-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-2632-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-2633-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)