Learning Styles Identification Model in a MOOC Learning Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Science and Education (ICCSE 2022)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1812))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 492 Accesses

Abstract

Different online learners have different learning styles that are influenced by their prior knowledge and personalities, which necessitates the use of an online platform to identify these learning behaviors in order to enhance the course. Based on the Felder-Silverman model, we offer a novel learning style theory model suitable for MOOC education environments in this work. Then we extract high-dimensional features from the MOOCCube data set produced from China’s XuetangX platform. Furthermore, to identify online users’ learning styles, we apply a two-level hierarchical learning style classification model. First, a learning autonomy classification model is used to filter inactive learners by collecting the learner autonomy index from the data set. Then, to detect distinct learning styles, we construct a clustering-based behavior identification model using the Gaussian Mixture Model. Our hierarchical classification model demonstrates great capability and enables researchers to conduct analytical studies on the learning patterns of online learners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernard, T.-W.C., Popescu, E., Graf, S.: Learning style Identifier: Improving the precision of learning style identification through computational intelligence algorithms. Expert Syst. Appl. 75, 94–108 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.01.021

  2. Cha, H.J., Kim, Y.S., Park, S.H., Yoon, T.B., Jung, Y.M., Lee, J.-H.: Learning styles diagnosis based on user interface behaviors for the customization of learning interfaces in an intelligent tutoring system. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 513–524. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuzilek, J., Hlosta, M., Zdahal, Z.: Open university learning analytics dataset. Scientific Data 4, 170171 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. CAROL Learner Data Documentation. [Online]. Available: https://datastage.stanford.edu/

  5. Yu, J., et al.: MOOCCube: a large-scale data repository for NLP applications in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, pp. 3135–3142 (2020). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.285

  6. Karagiannis, I., Satratzemi, M.: An adaptive mechanism for Moodle based on automatic detection of learning styles. Educ. Inf. Technol. 23(3), 1331–1357 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9663-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, H., Huang, T., Liu, S., Yin, H., Li, J., Yang, H., **a, Yu.: A learning style classification approach based on deep belief network for large-scale online education. J. Cloud Comput. 9(1), 1–17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-020-00165-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Holec, H.: Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Little, D.: Learner Autonomy 1: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Authentik, Dublin (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Onah, D.F., Sinclair, J., Boyatt, R.: Dropout rates of massive open online courses: behavioural patterns. EDULEARN14 proceedings, 1, pp. 5825–5834 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hmedna, B., Mezouary, A.E., Baz, O.: How Does Learners’ Prefer to Process Information in MOOCs? A Data-driven Study. Procedia Computer Science 148, 371–379 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carruthers, Stephen A., Young, A.: Preference of condition concerning time in learning environments of rural versus city eighth grade students. Learning styles network newsletter 1.2, 1(1980)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Felder, R.M., Silverman, L.K.: Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Eng. Educ. 78(7), 674–681 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to **gya Huang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Huang, J., Liu, J. (2023). Learning Styles Identification Model in a MOOC Learning Environment. In: Hong, W., Weng, Y. (eds) Computer Science and Education. ICCSE 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1812. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2446-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2446-2_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-2445-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-2446-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation