Performance Evaluation of Activated Sugarcane Bagasse for Abattoir Wastewater Treatment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Developments in Geotechnics and Structural Engineering (TRACE 2022)

Abstract

Wastewater from abattoir is known to be highly contaminated, which may cause harm to the environment and health if not handled carefully; many treatment approaches have been used to treat this wastewater. However, most of the approaches have its constraints, such as being expensive, ineffective or requires special skills; therefore, the needs arise to develop an inexpensive, effective, and eco-friendly way of treating this wastewater especially in develo** economy. Sugarcane bagasse has been proposed due to its availability, in expensiveness, biodegradability, and effectiveness in removing contaminants; in order to determine its effectiveness, different dosages of activated sugarcane bagasse (ASCB) (25, 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50 g/L) and reaction time of 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h were studied. The results of the experiment showed a pH increase from acidic to alkaline medium after 24 h through 96 h; the optimum dosage, reaction time, and percentage removal of COD, TDS, EC, and colour were determined to be (25 g/l, 24 h, 51.92%), (25 g/l, 24 h, 21.3%), (30 g/l, 120 h, 68.6%), and (50 g/l, 120 h, 83.54%), respectively. These findings showed a significant success on the usage of this adsorbent in the removal of contaminants in the wastewater with its effectiveness increasing by increasing its dosage; therefore, ASCB can be used in place of another adsorbent for treating abattoir wastewater, being it cheap and effective. Recommendation was made on the study of increasing the dosages of ASCB and kee** the reaction time constant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 234.33
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 295.39
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 295.39
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Satyanarayan S, Ramakant APV (2005) Conventional approach for abattoir wastewater treatment. Environ Technol 26(4):441–448

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bazrafshan E, Kord Mostafapour F, Farzadkia M, Ownagh KA, Mahvi AH (2012) Slaughterhouse wastewater treatment by combined chemical coagulation and electrocoagulation process. PLoS ONE 7(6):e40108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bustillo-Lecompte CF, Mehrvar M (2015) Slaughterhouse wastewater characteristics, treatment, and management in the meat processing industry: a review on trends and advances. J Environ Manage 161:287–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Obidegwu CS, Chineke HN, Ubajaka CN, Adogu PO (2019) Public health challenges in Somachi Main Abattoir Owerri, Nigeria: a review and field activity report. Eur J Med Health Sci 1(2)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bandaw T, Herago T (2017) Review on abattoir waste management. Global Vet 19(2):517–524

    Google Scholar 

  6. US-EPA (2002) Environmental assessment of proposed effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the meat and poultry products industry point source. EPA-821-B-01008, Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mittal G (2006) Treatment of wastewater from abattoirs before land application—a review. Biores Technol 97(9):1119–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fatima F, Du H, Kommalapati RR (2021) Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater with membrane technologies: a review. Water 13(14):1905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Maragkaki AE, Fountoulakis M, Gypakis A, Kyriakou A, Lasaridi K, Manios T (2017) Pilot-scale anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge with agro-industrial by-products for increased biogas production of existing digesters at wastewater treatment plants. Waste Manage 59:362–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Daifullah AAM, Girgis BS, Gad HMH (2003) Utilization of agro-residues (rice husk) in small waste water treatment plans. Mater Lett 57(11):1723–1731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mohan D, Singh KP, Singh VK (2008) Wastewater treatment using low cost activated carbons derived from agricultural byproducts—a case study. J Hazard Mater 152(3):1045–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Loh YR, Sujan D, Rahman ME, Das CA (2013) Sugarcane bagasse—the future composite material: a literature review. Resour Conserv Recycl 75:14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pandey A, Soccol CR, Nigam P, Soccol VT (2000) Biotechnological potential of agro-industrial residues. I: sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 74(1):69–80

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sn W (2008) Sugarcane bagasse: how easy is it to measure its constituents? Proc South Afr Sugar Technol Assoc 81:266–273

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tao HC, Zhang HR, Li JB, Ding WY (2015) Biomass based activated carbon obtained from sludge and sugarcane bagasse for removing lead ion from wastewater. Biores Technol 192:611–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Laszlo JA (1996) Preparing an ion exchange resin from sugarcane bagasse to remove reactive dye from wastewater. Textile Chemist Colorist 28(5)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saeed T, Sun G (2013) A lab-scale study of constructed wetlands with sugarcane bagasse and sand media for the treatment of textile wastewater. Biores Technol 128:438–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bahrodin MB, Zaidi NS, Kadier A, Hussein N, Syafiuddin A, Boopathy R (2022) A novel natural active coagulant agent extracted from the sugarcane bagasse for wastewater treatment. Appl Sci 12(16):7972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Beyan SM, Prabhu SV, Sissay TT, Getahun AA (2021) Sugarcane bagasse based activated carbon preparation and its adsorption efficacy on removal of BOD and COD from textile effluents: RSM based modeling, optimization and kinetic aspects. Bioresour Technol Rep 14:100664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nadzirah Z, Haslina HN, Adib MM (2015) Studies on the preparation of activated carbon sugarcane bagasse on removal of chemical oxygen demand, alkalinity and oil and grease of car wash wastewater. Adv Environ Biol 9(12):15–21

    Google Scholar 

  21. Soliman EM, Ahmed SA, Fadl AA (2011) Removal of calcium ions from aqueous solutions by sugar cane bagasse modified with carboxylic acids using microwave-assisted solvent-free synthesis. Desalination 278(1–3):18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Utomo HD, Phoon RYN, Shen Z, Ng LH, Lim ZB (2015) Removal of methylene blue using chemically modified sugarcane bagasse. Nat Resour 6(04):209

    Google Scholar 

  23. Raymundo AS, Zanarotto R, Belisário M, Pereira MDG, Ribeiro JN, Ribeiro AVFN (2010) Evaluation of sugar-cane bagasse as bioadsorbent in the textile wastewater treatment contaminated with carcinogenic congo red dye. Braz Arch Biol Technol 53:931–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ibrahim Mohammed, Lawal Usman Bala, Soja Abdulhameed Danjuma, Mambo Shamsul Rahman Mohamed, Kutty Ahmad Hussaini, Jagaba Gasim, Hayder Sule, Abubakar Ibrahim, Umaru Gasim Hayder Ahmed, Salih Rashid A., Saeed (2023) Sustainability Challenges and Delivering Practical Engineering Solutions Resources Materials Energy and Buildings Adsorption of Abattoir Wastewater Contaminants by Coconut Shell-Activated Carbon Springer International Publishing Cham 145–150

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibrahim, Umaru Mustapha Mohammed, Alhaji Ahmad Hussaini, Jagaba Shamsul Rahman Mohamed, Kutty Ibrahim Mohammed, Lawal Sule, Abubakar Usman Bala, Soja Gasim Hayder Ahmed, Salih Rashid A., Saeed (2023) Sustainability Challenges and Delivering Practical Engineering Solutions Resources Materials Energy and Buildings The Effect of Groundnut Shell Ash and Metakaolin on Geotechnical Properties of Black Cotton Soils Springer International Publishing Cham 177–183

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jagaba AH, et al., (2021) Evaluation of the physical, chemical, bacteriological and trace metals concentrations in different brands of packaged drinking water. Eng Lett 29(4):1552–1560

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ibrahim Mohammed Lawal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lawal, I.M. et al. (2023). Performance Evaluation of Activated Sugarcane Bagasse for Abattoir Wastewater Treatment. In: Shukla, S.K., Raman, S.N., Bhattacharjee, B., Singh, P. (eds) Recent Developments in Geotechnics and Structural Engineering. TRACE 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 338. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1886-7_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1886-7_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-1885-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-1886-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation