Inventory Behavior

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managerial Discretion in Imperfect Markets
  • 52 Accesses

Abstract

Inventories play an important role in stabilizing production as well as demand. Uncertainties in demand and availability of finances may also induce firms to hold different forms of inventories. The geographic spread of demand necessitated the spread of retail inventories and production. These sources give rise to managerial discretion. Defining optimal inventory holding to minimize managerial discretion has not been achieved as yet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that the more recent strategic management literature holds the view that firms choose investment strategies to provide them hit-and-run market advantages and shift to other product lines whenever it is necessary. See McGrath (2013).

  2. 2.

    Rao and Rastogi (1997a. 1997b) demonstrated empirically that minimum cost considerations are not important in managerial decision-making. They may accept a higher cost instead of foregoing sales. Similarly, they may be willing to accept a higher cost of holding inventory in preference to increasing sales. As a consequence, some of the following results may need modification in empirical practice.

  3. 3.

    Several other theoretical considerations have been outlined in Rao (1981, 1991).

  4. 4.

    Refer to Rao (1995, 1988), and Singh and Rao (1998).

  5. 5.

    When there is a credit crunch, the firm may employ subcontractors and franchising that will take the burden off the credit crunch. There is no need to reduce inventory as such.

References

  • Alchian, A. (1950). Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, 58, 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A. (1981). Retail inventory behavior and business fluctuations. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 443–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A. (1986). Can production smoothing model of inventories be saved?. Quarterly Journal of Econmics, 101, 431–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darbha, G. (2000). Financial factors, inventory investment and economic activity. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 15, 229–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fafchamps, M., Gunning, J. W., & Osetndorp, R. (2000). Inventories and risk in African manufacturing. Economic Journal, 110, 861–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazzari, S., & Peterson, B. (1993). Working capital investment: Evidence on financial constraints. RAND Journal of Economics, 24, 328–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. (1957). Risk. Harper Torch Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leland, H. (1972). The theory of the firm facing uncertain demand. American Economic Review, 62, 278–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levis, K. (2009). Winners and losers Atlantic books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. (2013). The end of competitive advantage: How to keep your strategy as fast as your business. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, T. V. S. R. (1978a). Corporate response to credit policy during the seventies. Indian Economic Journal, Conference volume, 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, T. V. S. R. (1978b). A normative approach to working capital management. Management Review of DMA 5, 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, T. V. S. R. (1981). Economic theory of inventory behavior. Indian Journal of Economics, 62, 247–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, T. V. S. R. (1988). Inventory decisions of public sector enterprises. Industrial India, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, T. V. S. R. (1991). Inventories and welfare. International Review of Economics and Business, 38, 267–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, T. V. S. R. (1995). Managerial preferences for holding inventory. Indian Journal of Applied Economics, 4, 27–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, T. V. S. R. (2005). Financial constraints, inventory investment and fixed capital. Indian Journal of Economics, 85, 489–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao,T. V. S. R., & Dua, A. (1977a). Working capital and the operating cycle: The micro-level norms. ASCI Journal of Management, 6, 188–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, T. V. S. R., & Dua, A. (1977b). Input uncertainty and the structure of production inventory decisions. Industrial Engineering and Management, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, T. V. S. R., & Dua, A. (1978). Normative aspects of the dynamics of the operating cycle. Decision, 5, 225–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, T. V. S. R., & Rastogi, R. (1997a). Discretionary managerial behavior. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, T. V. S. R., & Rastogi, R. (1997b). Identification of managerial preferences. Indian Journal of Applied Econmics, 6, 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, T. V. S. R., & Singh, A. (2000). Market imperfections, financial constraints, and the volatility of production. Indian Journal of Economics, 81, 61–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, T. V. S. R., & Singh, A. (2001). Effect of financial constraints on inventory investment. Indian Development Review, 1, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, T. V. S. R., & Singh, A. (2005). Financial constraints, inventory investment, and fixed capital. Indian Journal of Economics, 85, 484–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A., & Rao, T. V. S. R. (1998). Precautionary Inventories and Volatility of Production. Indian Journal of Economics, 78, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A., & Rao, T. V. S. R. (2000). Market Imperfection, Financial Constraints, and the Volatility of Production. Indian Journal of Economics, 81, 61–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. V. S. Ramamohan Rao .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ramamohan Rao, T.V.S. (2023). Inventory Behavior. In: Managerial Discretion in Imperfect Markets. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1537-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation