Source Camera Identification Using GGD and Normalized DCT Model-Based Feature Extraction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of International Conference on Data, Electronics and Computing (ICDEC 2022)

Part of the book series: Algorithms for Intelligent Systems ((AIS))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 73 Accesses

Abstract

In recent decades, blind feature-based source camera detection has drawn a lot of attention. In literature, researchers used a specific sort of distortion, such as vignetting effects, chromatic aberration, and radial lens distortion, etc., to distinguish between different camera models. Therefore, it becomes specific to the distortions present in the particular camera model. However, distortion-specific approaches perform poorly in the absence of the specific distortion in an image. To develop a source camera identification system, we introduce a non-distortion-specific methodology using normalized DCT coefficients, a generalized Gaussian distribution (GGD) model-based blind features. DCT is performed on the sub-images of N × N blocks after the image is normalized using mean subtracted contrast normalization (MSCN). Over three scales, the DCT features are extracted. To perform camera model identification, a multi-class SVM is used to utilize all the extracted features. The experiment was conducted on the Dresden image database, which contains 10,173 images captured by 43 devices distributed over 12 camera models. The proposed method showed a maximum accuracy of 98.82% on the dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 213.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 267.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Verdoliva L (2016) Handbook of digital forensics of multimedia data and devices. IEEE Signal Process Mag 33(1):164–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Piva A (2013) An overview on image forensics. ISRN Signal Process 2013:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Friedman G (1993) The trustworthy digital camera: restoring credibility to the photographic image. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 39:905–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blythe P, Fridrich J (2004) Secure digital camera. In: Proceedings of the Digital Forensic Research Workshop (DFRWS ’04), pp 17–19

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cox I, Bloom J, Bloom J, Miller M (2001) Digital watermarking. Morgan Kaufmann

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cox I, Miller M, Bloom J, Fridrich J, Kalker T (2008) Digital Water-Marking and Steganography, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann

    Google Scholar 

  7. Farid H (2009) Image forgery detection. IEEE Signal Process Mag 26:16–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahdian B, Saic S (2010) A bibliography on blind methods for identifying image forgery. Signal Process: Image Commun 25:389–399

    Google Scholar 

  9. Le N, Retraint F (2019) An improved algorithm for digital image authentication and forgery localization using demosaicing artifacts. IEEE Access 7:125038–125053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen C, Stamm M (2015) Camera model identification framework using an ensemble of demosaicing features. In: 2015 IEEE international workshop on information forensics and security (WIFS)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao X, Stamm M (2016) Computationally efficient demosaicing filter estimation for forensic camera model identification. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marra F, Poggi G, Sansone C, Verdoliva L (2016) A study of co-occurrence based local features for camera model identification. Multimed Tools Appl 76:4765–4781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bayar B, Stamm M (2017) Design principles of convolutional neural networks for multimedia forensics. Electron Imag 29:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen M, Fridrich JJ, GoljanM LJ (2008) Determining image origin and integrity using sensor noise. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 3(1):74–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tuama A, Comby F, Chaumont M (2016) Camera model identification with the use of deep convolutional neural networks. In: 2016 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Freire-Obregón D, Narducci F, Barra S, Castrillón-Santana M (2019) Deep learning for source camera identification on mobile devices. Pattern Recogn Lett 126:86–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen Y, Huang Y, Ding X (2017) Camera model identification with residual neural network. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mandelli, S., Bonettini, N. and Bestagini, P. Source camera model identification. Multimedia Forensics, pp 133–173(2022)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dirik AE, SencarHT MND (2008) Digital single lens reflex camera identification from traces of sensor dust. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 3(3):539–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lukás J, Fridrich JJ, Goljan M (2006) Digital camera identification from sensor pattern noise. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 1(2):205–214

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thai TH, Cogranne R, Retraint F (2014) Camera model identification based on the heteroscedastic noise model. IEEE Trans Image Proc 23(1):250–263

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Thai TH, Retraint F, Cogranne R (2016) Camera model identification based on the generalized noise model in natural images. Dig Signal Proc 48:285–297

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Galdran A, Araújo T, Mendonça A, Campilho A (2017) Retinal image quality assessment by mean-subtracted contrast-normalized coefficients. VipIMAGE 2017:844–853

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mittal A, Moorthy A, Bovik A (2012) No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain. IEEE Trans Image Process 21:4695–4708

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Saad M, Bovik A, Charrier C (2012) Blind image quality assessment: a natural scene statistics approach in the DCT domain. IEEE Trans Image Process 21:3339–3352

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Sharifi K, Leon-Garcia A (1995) Estimation of shape parameter for generalized Gaussian distributions in subband decompositions of video. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 5:52–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gloe T, Böhme R (2010) The Dresden image database for benchmarking digital image forensics. J Dig Forens Pract 3:150–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chang C, Lin C (2011) LIBSVM. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol 2:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bondi L, Baroffio L, Guera D, Bestagini P, Delp E, Tubaro S (2017) First steps toward camera model identification with convolutional neural networks. IEEE Signal Process Lett 24:259–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang B, Yin J, Tan S, Li Y, Li M (2018) Source camera model identification based on convolutional neural networks with local binary patterns coding. Signal Process Image Commun 68:162–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yao H, Qiao T, Xu M, Zheng N (2018) Robust multi-classifier for camera model identification based on convolution neural network. IEEE Access 6:24973–24982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ferreira W, Ferreira C, da Cruz Júnior G, Soares F (2020) A review of digital image forensics. Comput Electr Eng 85:106685

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pabitra Roy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Roy, P., Mitra, S., Das, N. (2023). Source Camera Identification Using GGD and Normalized DCT Model-Based Feature Extraction. In: Das, N., Binong, J., Krejcar, O., Bhattacharjee, D. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Data, Electronics and Computing. ICDEC 2022. Algorithms for Intelligent Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1509-5_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation