Abstract
This paper provides a social-dialectological slant on variation and change in language. The particular analytical framework used here brings together language synchrony and diachrony for examining dialect change in the Marathi region. First a brief overview of the central theoretical and methodological tenets of this approach to variation and change in language is presented. Drawing on data collected in an on-going dialectological survey of Marathi, the paper provides a description of synchronic variation in case marking and agreement in the transitive-perfective clause in regional varieties of Marathi. It is suggested that the variation is the result of both language-internal and language-external factors. The contemporary dialectal data are compared with data from historical sources (Grierson, G. (1905). Linguistic Survey of India. Vol. 7. Indo-Aran family. Southern group. Specimens of the Marathi Language. Calcutta. Reprinted 1968. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.). An expansion in the pool of linguistic feature variants and a broad tendency towards dialect levelling (i.e. reduction in inter-dialectal differences) through standardization are noted for the regional varieties. However, the rates of standardization across linguistic features and across social groups and regions are shown to vary. The paper concludes by highlighting the benefits of a dialect survey/database for examining language variation and change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
‘Dialect’ here refers to a language variety which is used in a geographically limited part of a language area in which it is ‘roofed’ by a structurally related standard variety; a dialect typically displays structural peculiarities in several language components (cf. Chambers & Trudgill, 1998: 5; Auer et al. (2005)). Usually dialects have relatively little overt prestige and are mainly used orally.
- 2.
The project is funded by the Rajya Marathi Vikas Sanstha, Govt. of Maharashtra (2017-).
- 3.
The videos (‘The Deccan College Stimulus Kit’) can be accessed be accessed on the project website www.sdml.ac.in.
- 4.
Grierson makes a difference between the Konkan standard (which includes varieties such Agri, Bankoti and Sangameshwari in the coastal stretch from Thane to north Ratnagiri) and Konkani spoken in the region extending from Rajapur in Ratnagiri district up till Sindhudurg district.
- 5.
Kokni (Konkani) here refers to the speech variety of the coastal region of Maharashtra, i.e. the Konkan. This is not to be confused with Konkani, the official language in the state of Goa.
References
Auer, P., Hinskens, F., & Kerswill, P. (Eds.). (2005). Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in dialects of Europe. CUP.
Bisang, W. (2004). Dialectology and typology—An integrative perspective. In B. Kortmann (Ed.), Dialectology meets typology. Dialect grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 11–45). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chambers, J., & Trudgill, P. (1998; first published 1980). Dialectology. Cambridge: CUP.
Chamoreau, C., & Léglise, I. (Eds.). (2012). Dynamics of contact-induced language change (Language Contact and Bilingualism Series 2). De Gruyter.
Hinskens, F. (2021). The future of dialects and the dialectology of the future: Some considerations, with special attention to the Dutch language area. Taal en Tongval. https://doi.org/10.5117/TET2020.1.HINS. Accessed on 14.4.2022.
Grierson, G. (1905). Linguistic Survey of India, vol. 7. Indo-Aryan Family. Southern group. Specimens of the Marathi Language. Calcutta. Reprinted 1968. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Grierson, G. (1907). Linguistic Survey of India, vol. 4.3. Indo-Aryan Family. Central Group. The Bhīl Languages, including Khāndēśī, Banjārī or Labhānī, Bahrūpiā, & c. Calcutta. Reprinted 1968. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Kazi, S. (2019). The Grammatical Sketch and Texts of Sangameshwari. Unpublished M.A. dissertation submitted to the Deccan College (Deemed University), Pune. Research funded under the project Survey of Dialects of the Marathi Language (SDML).
Kiparsky, P. (2008). Universals constrain change; change results in typological generalizations. In J. Good (Ed.), Linguistic universals and language change. Oxford: OUP.
Klaiman, M. (1987). Mechanisms of ergativity in South Asia. Lingua, 71(1–4), 61–102.
Kulkarni-Joshi, S. (2016). Forty years of language contact and change in Kupwar: A critical reassessment of the intertranslatability model. International Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, De Gruyter, 147–174.
Kulkarni-Joshi, S., & Kelkar, M. (2020). Synchronic variation and diachronic change in dialects of Marathi. In T. Khan et al. (Ed.), Alternative horizons in linguistics. Munich: Lincom Europa.
Labov. W. (2003). Pursuing the cascade model. In D. Britain, & J. Cheshire (Eds.), Social dialectology (pp. 9). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Masica, C. (1991). The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: CUP.
Mufwene, S. (2001). The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge University Press.
Paradkar, R. (2021). Language and transnational identity: A sociolinguistic account of the Kokni diaspora in Cape Town. Doctoral dissertation submitted to Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute, Pune.
Peterson, J. (2022). A sociolinguistic-typological approach to the linguistic prehistory of South Asia: Two case studies. Language Dynamics and Change, 1–50.
Sankoff, G. (2006). Age: Apparent time and real time. Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Second Edition. Article Number: LALI: 01479. Accessed online on 29 April 2019.
Satam, S. (2020). Variation and change in the speech variety of Sawantwadi. Bulletin of Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute, 80, 135–145. Research funded under the project Survey of Dialects of the Marathi Language (SDML).
Siewierska, A., & Bakker, D. (2006). Bi-directional versus uni-directional asymmetries in the encoding of semantic distinctions in free and bound person forms. In T. Nevalainen, J. Klemola, & M. Laitinen (Eds.), Types of variation: Diachronic, dialectal and typological interfaces (pp. 21–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Trudgill, P., Britian, D., & Cheshire, J. (2003). Social Dialectology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tulpule, S. G. (1949). Prachīn Marathi Gadya [In Marathi]. Pune: Venus Book Stall.
Tulpule, S. G. (1963). Prachīn Maraṭhi koriv Lekh [In Marathi]. Pune University Press.
Tulpule, S. G. (Ed.). (1966). Līḷācharitra (purvārdha, Part 2) [In Marathi]. Nagpur-Pune: Suvichar Prakashan Mandal.
Tulpule, S. G. (1973). Yādavkalīn Marathi Bhāshā, 2nd edition. Pune: Venus Prakashan.
Walkden, G. (2017). The actuation problem. In A. Ledgeway & I. Roberts (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of historical syntax (pp. 403–424). Cambridge University Press.
Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W. P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium (pp. 95–195). University of Texas Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kulkarni-Joshi, S. (2023). Variation and Change in Dialects of Marathi: A Social-Dialectological Approach. In: Chandra, P. (eds) Variation in South Asian Languages. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1149-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1149-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-1148-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-1149-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)