On Gender Micro-Variation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Variation in South Asian Languages
  • 84 Accesses

Abstract

This paper looks at dialect variation in Hindi ‘dialects’ Awadhi and Bhojpuri. Depending on the theory one adopts, small, micro-level differences between dialects are either taken to result from differential feature selections or from usage and input-based strategies. I instead propose that feature-level variation is tied to certain structural configurations, rather than to just discrete feature learning. Using gender variation data, I show that dialects that have a nominalizer, enable gender morphology; those which lack a nominalizer fail to display gender agreement. This correlation indicates specific structural signatures for gender morphology, while acknowledging the possibility that gender may be latent in every language, even those that do not morphologically realize gender. Language-learning children use these signatures to grasp structural schemas that are conducive to gender expression. This paper also shows how languages shift between nouns and adjectives and how gender expression via the nominalizing strategy lies at the intersection between these two categories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 139.09
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    English allows grammatical gender in restricted environments, such as the lexical items ‘she-wolf’ or when referring to inanimate objects with a feminine pronoun (e.g. ‘The captain’s ship sunk; he couldn’t save her’).

  2. 2.

    An anonymous reviewer shares the following Hindi example, to argue that the noun is an independent cue to grammatical gender. When asked if a pillow is ‘good’ (with the adjective either corresponding to the Hindi acchaa-masc or acchii-fem), the child responds with ‘pillow koi boy hota he!!’ (Can a pillow ever be a boy?). To my understanding, there are two ways to interpret the child’s response. Either the child is referring to the pillow as an inanimate object, and the inability to identify inanimate objects with the help of biological gender morphology, or the child is already aware of the grammatical feminine value ascribed to ‘pillow’ in Hindi and is ruling out the acchaa (good-masc) possibility. Either way, it is the gender inflection on the predicate that signals the noun’s grammatical gender; the nominal form itself is neutral in this regard.

  3. 3.

    See Cardona (1988, p. 178) for a discussion of MIA adjectives.

References

  • Baker, M. (1996). The Polysynthesis Parameter. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. (2003). Lexical categories. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. (2005). The Innate Endowment for Language: Overspecified or Underspecified. In Peter Carruthers, Steve Lawrence, and Steven Stich (eds). The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 156–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. (2008). The Macroparameter in a Microparametric world. In T. Biberauer (Ed.), The Limits of Syntactic Variation (pp. 351–374). John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Béjar, S., & Rezac, M. (2003). Person Licensing and the Derivation of PCC Effects. In: A. Teresa Perez-Leroux, & Y. Roberge (eds.) Romance Linguistics: Theory and Acquisition Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, D. N. S. (1994). The Adjectival Category: Criteria for differentiation and identification. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biberauer, T., & Roberts, I. (2012). Towards a parameter hierarchy for auxiliaries: diachronic considerations. In: J. Chancharu, X. Hu & M. Mitrović (eds). Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 6, pp. 209–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, H. (2001). Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations: Syntactic projection and the lexicon. Ms., University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardona, G. (1988). Pāṇini: His work and its traditions. Part I: General introduction and background. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, S. K. (1953). Ukti-vyakti-prakarana: The oldest document in Kosali or Awadhi, edited by Muni Sri **avijayaji. Bombay: Singh-Jain Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, G. G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R. M. (1982). Where have All the Adjectives Gone? And Other Essays in Semantics and Syntax. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupfer, K. (2002). Die Demonstrativpronomina im Rigveda. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, J.J. (2015). Participles in Rigvedic Sanskrit: The syntax and semantics of adjectival verb forms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, M. (2016). Building adjectival meaning without adjectives. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithun, M. (1984). The Evolution of Noun Incorporation. Language, 60(4):847–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. (2010). A grammar of Kharia: A South Munda language. Leiden and Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustet, R. (1989). Die Morphosyntax des" Adjektivs" im Sprachvergleich. Frankfurt am Maine: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saksena, B. (1971). Evolution of Awadhi: A branch of Hindi. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sridhar, S. N. (1990). Kannada. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stassen, L. (1997). Intransitive predication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, W. D. (1889/1896). Sanskrit grammar. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzer, H. (1996). The Typology of Adjectival Predication. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges the financial help from the Indian Council of Social Science Research, New Delhi, which facilitated wide-scale surveys among the native populace speaking Awadhi, Bhojpuri and many other related languages spoken in Uttar Pradesh and its neighboring states.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pritha Chandra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chandra, P. (2023). On Gender Micro-Variation. In: Chandra, P. (eds) Variation in South Asian Languages. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1149-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1149-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-1148-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-1149-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation