Abstract
This paper looks at dialect variation in Hindi ‘dialects’ Awadhi and Bhojpuri. Depending on the theory one adopts, small, micro-level differences between dialects are either taken to result from differential feature selections or from usage and input-based strategies. I instead propose that feature-level variation is tied to certain structural configurations, rather than to just discrete feature learning. Using gender variation data, I show that dialects that have a nominalizer, enable gender morphology; those which lack a nominalizer fail to display gender agreement. This correlation indicates specific structural signatures for gender morphology, while acknowledging the possibility that gender may be latent in every language, even those that do not morphologically realize gender. Language-learning children use these signatures to grasp structural schemas that are conducive to gender expression. This paper also shows how languages shift between nouns and adjectives and how gender expression via the nominalizing strategy lies at the intersection between these two categories.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
English allows grammatical gender in restricted environments, such as the lexical items ‘she-wolf’ or when referring to inanimate objects with a feminine pronoun (e.g. ‘The captain’s ship sunk; he couldn’t save her’).
- 2.
An anonymous reviewer shares the following Hindi example, to argue that the noun is an independent cue to grammatical gender. When asked if a pillow is ‘good’ (with the adjective either corresponding to the Hindi acchaa-masc or acchii-fem), the child responds with ‘pillow koi boy hota he!!’ (Can a pillow ever be a boy?). To my understanding, there are two ways to interpret the child’s response. Either the child is referring to the pillow as an inanimate object, and the inability to identify inanimate objects with the help of biological gender morphology, or the child is already aware of the grammatical feminine value ascribed to ‘pillow’ in Hindi and is ruling out the acchaa (good-masc) possibility. Either way, it is the gender inflection on the predicate that signals the noun’s grammatical gender; the nominal form itself is neutral in this regard.
- 3.
See Cardona (1988, p. 178) for a discussion of MIA adjectives.
References
Baker, M. (1996). The Polysynthesis Parameter. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baker, M. (2003). Lexical categories. Cambridge University Press.
Baker, M. (2005). The Innate Endowment for Language: Overspecified or Underspecified. In Peter Carruthers, Steve Lawrence, and Steven Stich (eds). The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 156–174.
Baker, M. (2008). The Macroparameter in a Microparametric world. In T. Biberauer (Ed.), The Limits of Syntactic Variation (pp. 351–374). John Benjamins.
Béjar, S., & Rezac, M. (2003). Person Licensing and the Derivation of PCC Effects. In: A. Teresa Perez-Leroux, & Y. Roberge (eds.) Romance Linguistics: Theory and Acquisition Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bhat, D. N. S. (1994). The Adjectival Category: Criteria for differentiation and identification. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Biberauer, T., & Roberts, I. (2012). Towards a parameter hierarchy for auxiliaries: diachronic considerations. In: J. Chancharu, X. Hu & M. Mitrović (eds). Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 6, pp. 209–36.
Borer, H. (2001). Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations: Syntactic projection and the lexicon. Ms., University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Cardona, G. (1988). Pāṇini: His work and its traditions. Part I: General introduction and background. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Chatterji, S. K. (1953). Ukti-vyakti-prakarana: The oldest document in Kosali or Awadhi, edited by Muni Sri **avijayaji. Bombay: Singh-Jain Series.
Corbett, G. G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge University Press.
Dixon, R. M. (1982). Where have All the Adjectives Gone? And Other Essays in Semantics and Syntax. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Kupfer, K. (2002). Die Demonstrativpronomina im Rigveda. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Lowe, J.J. (2015). Participles in Rigvedic Sanskrit: The syntax and semantics of adjectival verb forms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Menon, M. (2016). Building adjectival meaning without adjectives. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.
Mithun, M. (1984). The Evolution of Noun Incorporation. Language, 60(4):847–894.
Peterson, J. (2010). A grammar of Kharia: A South Munda language. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
Pustet, R. (1989). Die Morphosyntax des" Adjektivs" im Sprachvergleich. Frankfurt am Maine: Peter Lang.
Saksena, B. (1971). Evolution of Awadhi: A branch of Hindi. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Sridhar, S. N. (1990). Kannada. Routledge.
Stassen, L. (1997). Intransitive predication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Whitney, W. D. (1889/1896). Sanskrit grammar. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wetzer, H. (1996). The Typology of Adjectival Predication. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Acknowledgements
The author acknowledges the financial help from the Indian Council of Social Science Research, New Delhi, which facilitated wide-scale surveys among the native populace speaking Awadhi, Bhojpuri and many other related languages spoken in Uttar Pradesh and its neighboring states.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chandra, P. (2023). On Gender Micro-Variation. In: Chandra, P. (eds) Variation in South Asian Languages. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1149-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1149-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-1148-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-1149-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)