Global Transformation in the Electricity Sector

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neoliberal Transformation of Electricity

Abstract

This chapter clarifies what liberalisation corresponds to specifically in the electricity sector, scrutinise drivers of change in the organising principles of the sector to address what caused electricity liberalisation, and assesses electricity liberalisation with a spatio-temporally holistic perspective. It first begins by examining reflections of neoliberalism on the structure of electricity industry, then investigates drivers of change in the sector by develo** a taxonomy for classifying the organising principles of the sector from a historical perspective, and makes an assessment of the global electricity liberalisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 47.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
GBP 59.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I preferred using ‘hail’ in order to reflect usefulness of electricity as a superior lighting energy and people’s eagerness to use it.

  2. 2.

    I preferred importing ‘mein’ and ‘reich’ from German, in order to attribute to the rising statist and totalitarian understanding of the time.

References

  • Bacon, R. W., & Besant-Jones, J. (2002). Global electric power reform, privatization and liberalization of the electric power industry in develo** countries. World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, L., & Drazen, A. (1997). Capital-account liberalization as a signal. American Economic Review, 87(1), 138–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News. (2020, April 20). US oil prices turn negative as demand dries up. Retrieved from BBC News: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-52350082#:~:text=The%20price%20of%20US%20oil,world%20have%20kept%20people%20inside

  • Boersma, T. (2015). Energy security and natural gas markets in Europe: Lessons from the EU and the United States. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1968). Why regulate utilities? Journal of Law and Economics, 11(1), 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S., & Pelletier, A. (2018). Rivatization in develo** countries: What are the lessons of recent experience? The World Bank Observer, 33(1), 65–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum, H. B., & Henig, J. R. (1997). Privatization and political theory. Journal of International Affairs, 338–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthau, A., & Sitter, N. (2018). Conceptualizing the energy nexus of global public policy and international political economy. In A. Goldthau, M. F. Keating, & C. Caroline (Eds.), Handbook of the international political economy of energy and natural resources (pp. 23–32). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83(6), 1420–1443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, P. (2013). The geopolitics of natural gas: The future of long-term LNG contracts. Harvard University’s Belfer Center and Rice University’s Baker Institute Center for Energy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, W. (2001). Tutors and pupils: International organizations, central European elites, and Western models. Governance, 14(2), 169–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamasb, T. (2006). Between the state and market: Electricity sector reform in develo** countries. Utilities Policy, 14(1), 14–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamasb, T., & Pollitt, M. (2005). Electricity market reform in the European union: Review of progress toward liberalization and integration. The Energy Journal, 26(Special Issue), 11–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P. (2006). Introduction to electricity sector liberalization: Lessons learned from cross-country studies. In F. Sioshansi & W. Pfaffenberger (Eds.), Electricity market reform: An international perspective (pp. 1–32). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P. (2008). Lessons learned from electricity market liberalization. The Energy Journal, 29(2), 9–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P., & Schmalensee, R. (1983). Markets for power: An analysis of electric utility deregulation. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I. (2010). The United Nations and global energy governance: Past challenges, future choices. Global Change, Peace & Security, 175–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D. (1999). Competition in the power sectors of transition economies. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knieps, G. (2006). Sector-specific market power regulation versus general competition law: Criteria for judging competitive versus regulated markets. In F. Sioshansi & W. Pfaffenberger (Eds.), Electricity market reform: An international perspective (pp. 49–74). Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzemko, C., Lawrence, A., & Watson, M. (2019). New directions in the international political economy of energy. Review of International Political Economy, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlechild, S. (2007). Beyond Regulation. In C. Robinson (Ed.), Utility regulation in competitive markets: Problems and progress (pp. 7–33). Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovei, L. (2001). The single-buyer model: A dangerous path toward competitive electricity markets. World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, T. (2017). Explaining energy disputes at the world trade organization. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(3), 391–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. N. (1997). Ideological motivations of privatization in Great Britain versus develo** countries. Journal of International Affairs, 50(2), 391–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, H. (1964). Government and parliament: A survey from the Inside. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D., & Pollitt, M. (1997). Estructuring and privatisation of the CEGB—Was it worth it? Journal of Industrial Economics, 45(3), 269–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nworie, I. (2017). The economics of electricity market reforms in develo** countries: An African experience and lessons. University of Portsmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2000). Regulatory reform in network industries. Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Özbuğday, F. C. (2015). The future of retail electricity market. Turkish Energy Foundation (TENVA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, M. (1999). The survey of the liberalization of public enterprises in the UK since 1979. In M. Kagami, & M. Tsuji (Eds.), Privatization, deregulation and institutional framework (pp. 120–169). Institute of Develo** Economies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, M. (2008). Foreword: Liberalization and regulation in electricity systems—How can we get the balance right? In F. Sioshansi (Ed.), Competitive electricity markets: Design, implementation, performance (pp. xvii-xxxiv). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, M. G. (2012). The role of policy in energy transitions: Lessons from the energy liberalisation era. Energy Policy, 50, 128–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, R. (2015). Combined cycle: The preferred option. Power engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, B. A., & Elkins, Z. (2004). The globalization of liberalization: Policy diffusion in the international political economy. American Political Science Review, 98(1), 71–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sioshansi, F., & Pfaffenberger, W. (2006). Why restructure electricity markets? In F. Sioshansi & W. Pfaffenberger (Eds.), Electricity market reform: An International perspective (pp. 35–48). Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling, A. (2014). Transforming power: Social science and the politics of energy choices. Energy Research and Social Science, 1, 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1993). The World Bank's role in the electric power sector: Policies for effective institutional, regulatory and financial reform. World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yergin, D. (2011). The quest: Energy, security, and the remaking of the modern world. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi-chong, X. (2006). The myth of the single solution: Electricity reforms and the World Bank. Energy, 31(6–7), 802–814.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serhan Ünal .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ünal, S. (2023). Global Transformation in the Electricity Sector. In: Neoliberal Transformation of Electricity. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0282-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0282-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-0281-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-0282-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation