A Visual Design Analysis of Urban Air Mobility for Indian Users

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design in the Era of Industry 4.0, Volume 2 (ICORD 2023)

Abstract

The research aims to experiment with the visual aspect of designing and develo** Urban Air Mobility (UAM). UAM is being developed in India and across the world as a new beginning in human transport, in the form of eVTOL (electric vertical take-off and landing) aircraft. Acceptance of technology as a safe mode of transport is very critical. According to research, visual safety is a vital factor that plays an important role. Researchers use the study of cognitive pragmatics to define the visual composition of UAM. Human factors influencing the exterior design elements of the UAM are mapped and identified for further study using the process of brainstorming and user-centered design. The scope of the study is limited to Indian commuters traveling in urban environments. A survey was conducted using images and illustrations of different UAM designs to identify design elements and their visual impact on the urban commuter. The questionnaire was built on understanding their views on visual comfort and exterior design elements like wings, rotors, and doors. The study reveals that tangible aspects like rotors, their placement, the inclusion of wings, and their composition induce an intangible sense of safety in the mind of future users. These will also be vital aspects of the exterior design of UAM. The paper further proposes the preferred design elements for future UAMs, which will contribute to the visual perception of safety for Indian commuters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chakrabartty, A., Gupta, S.: Traffic congestion in the metropolitan city of Kolkata. J. Infrastruct. Dev. 6(1), 43–59 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0974930614543046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwab, K.: World Economy Forum, No. 14 Jan 2016 (2016) (Online). Available: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/. Accessed 25 Oct 2022

  3. Lillian, G.: NASA, Advanced Air Mobility: What is AAM?, no. 2 Jul 2020, p. 6 (2020) (Online). Available: https://www.nasa.gov/aeroresearch/stem/AAM. Accessed 25 Aug 2022

  4. Ploetner, K.O., Antoniou, H.C., Fu, F.F.M., Llorca, S.K.C., Moreno, R.M.A.T.: Long‑term Application Potential of Urban Air Mobility Complementing Public Transport: An Upper Bavaria Example, no. 0123456789 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-020-00468-5

  5. Chaturmutha, K.M., Mathew, D.J.: Factors Influencing the Exterior Design of Autonomous Passenger Drones: Literature Review, pp. 2087–2096 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.211

  6. Ackerman, E.: Air Taxis Are Safe, no. 21 Oct 2021 (2021) (Online). Available: https://spectrum.ieee.org/air-taxis-are-safe-according-to-the-manufacturers. Accessed 25 Oct 2022

  7. NASA and Booz Allen Hamilton, UAM Market Study—Technical Out Brief, no. 19 Oct 19, 2018, p. 445 (2018) (Online). Available: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20190000517&hterms=screening+mass+screening+mass+Community+based+school+based+work+place+hypertension+high+blood+pressure+diabetes+diabetes+mellitus+high+blood+glucose&qs=Ntx%3Dmode%2Bmatchall%26Ntk%3DAll%26N%3D0%26No%3D. Accessed 25 Oct 2022

  8. Ackerman, E.: How Safe Are eVTOLs? Extremely Safe—Say Manufacturers, no. Nov 2021 (2021) (Online). Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=9606505. Accessed 25 Oct 2022

  9. Morel, L., Boly, V.: New Product Development Process (NPDP): updating the identification stage practices. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 3(2), 232–251 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2006.009373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hassenzahl, M., Wiklund-Engblom, A., Bengs, A., Hägglund, S., Diefenbach, S.: Experience-oriented and product-oriented evaluation: psychological need fulfillment, positive affect, and product perception. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 31(8), 530–544 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1064664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rajagopal, P., Montgomery, N.V.: I imagine, i experience, i like: the false experience effect. J. Consum. Res. 38(3), 578–594 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1086/660165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhi-Jun, W., Cheng-Ai, N., Zhao-Hui, B.: Cognitive pragmatics relations in product symbol accepted process. In: 9th International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design and Conceptual Design, CAIDCD 2008, pp. 834–837 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/CAIDCD.2008.4730690

  13. Krippendorff, K.: Product Semantics: Exploring the Symbolic Qualities of Form Product Semantics: Exploring the Symbolic Qualities of Form, vol. 3, no. 1984, pp. 4–9 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Krippendorff, K.: Departmental Papers (ASC) Product Semantics: A Triangulation and Four Design Theories A Triangulation and Four Design Theories (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mithun, A.M., Yafooz, W.M.S.: Extended User Centered Design (UCD) process in the aspect of human computer interaction. In: 2018 International Conference on Smart Computing Electronic Enterprises, ICSCEE 2018 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSCEE.2018.8538388

  16. Carr, T.H., McCauley, C., Sperber, R.D., Parmelee, C.M.: Words, pictures, and priming: On semantic activation, conscious identification, and the automaticity of information processing. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 8(6), 757–777 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.8.6.757

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by DST National Mission Interdisciplinary Cyber-Physical Systems (NM-ICPS) and Technology Innovation Hub on Autonomous Navigation and Data Acquisition Systems: TiHAN Foundations at Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Hyderabad.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ketan Madan Chaturmutha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A

Appendix A

  1. 1.

    What age group do you belong to? [Multiple choice answers: 18–30, 31–50, 51 years and above]

  2. 2.

    How do you travel every day to your workplace? [Multiple choice answers: Personal Self Driven Car, Personal Chauffeur Driven Car, Shared Vehicle (Ola/ Uber/ Pool), Public Transport, Bike/ Cycle/ Walk]

  3. 3.

    Which of the following air mobility you have traveled with before? [Multiple choice answers: Airplane, Helicopter, Both, None of the above]

  4. 4.

    Are you aware of autonomous aerial vehicles (Air Taxis), which will be used as human transport (to commute) in near future? [Answers: Yes/No]

  5. 5.

    If given a choice from below autonomous aerial vehicles, which of the following do you prefer for safe intracity travel? [Every individual option was supported with illustration]

    • Option A: Wings above cabin with covered propellers on wings [Rate on a scale of 1 to 10, (1: Least Preferred, 10: Most Preferred]

    • Option B: Wings above cabin with covered propellers on wings [Rate on a scale of 1 to 10, (1: Least Preferred, 10: Most Preferred]

    • Option C: Wings above cabin with covered propellers on wings [Rate on a scale of 1 to 10, (1: Least Preferred, 10: Most Preferred]

    • Option D: Wings above cabin with covered propellers on wings [Rate on a scale of 1 to 10, (1: Least Preferred, 10: Most Preferred]

    • Option E: Wings above cabin with covered propellers on wings [Rate on a scale of 1 to 10, (1: Least Preferred, 10: Most Preferred]

  6. 6.

    What were the reasons for selecting your most preferred design to feel safe? [Text]

  7. 7.

    What were the reasons for selecting your least preferred design to feel safe? [Text]

  8. 8.

    If given a choice from the below door types for autonomous aerial vehicles, which of the following do you prefer for safe entry and exit? [Every individual option was supported with illustration]

    • Option F: Gull-wing door [Rate on a scale of 1 to 10, (1: Least Preferred, 10: Most Preferred]

    • Option G: Sliding door [Rate on a scale of 1 to 10, (1: Least Preferred, 10: Most Preferred]

    • Option H: Hinge door [Rate on a scale of 1 to 10, (1: Least Preferred, 10: Most Preferred]

  9. 9.

    Explain the reasons for selecting your most preferred design. [Text]

  10. 10.

    Explain the reasons for selecting your least preferred design. [Text]

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chaturmutha, K.M., Mathew, D.J. (2023). A Visual Design Analysis of Urban Air Mobility for Indian Users. In: Chakrabarti, A., Singh, V. (eds) Design in the Era of Industry 4.0, Volume 2. ICORD 2023. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 342. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0264-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0264-4_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-0263-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-0264-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation