Transient Identification in Nuclear Power Plants by PCA Based Neural Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Risk and Reliability Modelling and Assessment (ICRESH 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 46 Accesses

Abstract

Nuclear power plants are complex engineering systems that are maintained and operated by human operators. When a transient occurs in an NPP, it is important for the operator to quickly identify and initiate corrective actions in order to mitigate the consequences, if any, and also to maintain the safety of the plant. As simultaneous generation of many alarms and annunciations in the control room may alert the operator on the onset of the transient it is quite possible that operator get confused to quickly act and identify the correct transient. By continuously analysing sensor data and detecting early warning signs, artificial intelligence models can provide timely alerts and enable operator to initiate proactive actions to mitigate the consequences of the transients. This paper presents a machine learning based transient identification model which assists the operator to identify the transient and initiate corrective action well within the stipulated time. The artificial neural networks based transient identification model has been developed for detecting loss of coolant accidents and main steam line break events in standard 220MWe Indian nuclear power plants. Several important input signals have been identified from the safety analysis reports and transient data has been generated from thermal–hydraulic simulation codes for training neural networks. The major outputs of neural network model are the size of the break, location of the break, etc. As the dimension of the input signals is significantly large, principal component analysis technique has also been employed to improve the performance of neural network model. The performance of neural network model with and without the application of principal component analysis is discussed in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abdi H, Williams LJ (2010) Principal component analysis, vol 2. Wiley and Sons

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ilin A, Raiko T (2010) Practical approaches to principal component analysis in the presence of missing values. J Mach Learn Res 11:1957–2000

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Delgutte B, Greenberg J (2005) The discrete Fourier transform, HST582J/6.555J/16.456J, Biomedical Signal and Image Processing Spring

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haykin SS (2001) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bishop CM (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press, New York, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Hagan MT, Menhaj MB (1994) Training feed forward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5(6)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Santhosh TV, Shrivastava A, Sanyasi Rao VVS, Ghosh AK, Kushwaha HS (2009) Diagnostic system for identification of accident scenarios in nuclear power plants using artificial neural networks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 54:759–762

    Google Scholar 

  8. Santhosh TV, Srivastava A, Contractor AD, Thangamani I, Vinod G, Verma V, Kumar R, Chattopadhyay J (2023) Transient identification & operator decision support system for PHWR (Diagnostic System). In: Artificial intelligence & robotics, BARC newsletter. ISSN: 0976-2108

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fletcher GD, Schultz RR (1995) RELAP5/MOD3.2 Code manual. Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. V. Santhosh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Meghana, G., Santhosh, T.V., Ambili, P.S., Vinod, G., Chattopadhyay, J. (2024). Transient Identification in Nuclear Power Plants by PCA Based Neural Networks. In: Varde, P.V., Vinod, G., Joshi, N.S. (eds) Advances in Risk and Reliability Modelling and Assessment. ICRESH 2024. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3087-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation