Enhancing Graph-Based Representation Learning with Adversarial Policy Gradient: A Hyperparameter Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Frontiers in Computing and Systems (COMSYS 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 974))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 20 Accesses

Abstract

Modeling the intricate neural mechanisms underlying human visual processing poses significant challenges. In recent years, graph-based representations have emerged as a promising approach to capturing inter-region relationships within the visual processing network. However, learning an optimal graph representation from limited data remains challenging, primarily due to the absence of ground truth to guide the learning process. This article analyzes a novel approach to graph-based representation generation using the adversarial policy gradient framework. The adapted framework involves an adversarial game between the policy network and the reward network, iteratively improving the quality of the generated graph representation. By leveraging the strengths of both networks through this adversarial process, the approach yields refined and informative graph-based representations. Through extensive hyperparameter analysis, the study investigates the impact of various settings, including learning rates, network architectures, and number of episodes, on the performance of the Adversarial policy gradient approach. By examining the method’s sensitivity to these hyperparameters, the article provides insights into the dynamics of graph-based representation learning and identifies optimal settings for high-quality representation spaces. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, highlighting its potential to overcome the challenges associated with learning graph representations from limited data. The findings shed light on the crucial role of hyperparameter selection in the success of the adversarial policy gradient approach, providing researchers with valuable guidance in applying this methodology to various domains and tasks involving representation learning from graph-based data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Agrawal P, Stansbury D, Malik J, Gallant J (2014) Pixels to voxels: modeling visual representation in the human brain

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chatterjee S, Pain S, Samanta D (2023) Adversarial policy gradient for learning graph-based representation in human visual processing. https://openreview.net/forum?id=5-ROmmBJKV

  3. Conturo TE, Lori NF, Cull TS, Akbudak E, Snyder AZ, Shimony JS, McKinstry RC, Burton H, Raichle ME (1999) Tracking neuronal fiber pathways in the living human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96(18):10422–10427 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.18.10422, https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.96.18.10422

  4. Cui Y, Qiao K, Zhang C, Wang L, Yan B, Tong l (2021) Gabornet visual encoding: a lightweight region-based visual encoding model with good expressiveness and biological interpretability. Front Neurosci 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.614182

  5. Deshpande G, Wang Y (2022) Noninvasive characterization of functional pathways in layer-specific microcircuits of the human brain using 7T fMRI. Brain Sci 12:1361. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12101361

  6. Dipasquale O, Sethi A, Laganá MM, Baglio F, Baselli G, Kundu P, Harrison NA, Cercignani M (2017) Comparing resting state fMRI de-noising approaches using multi- and single-echo acquisitions. PLoS ONE 12

    Google Scholar 

  7. Du C, Du C, Huang L, He H (2018) Reconstructing perceived images from human brain activities with Bayesian deep multiview learning. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst PP:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2882456

  8. Gilson M, Kouvaris N, Deco G, Mangin JF, Poupon C, Lefranc S, Rivière D, Zamora-López G (2019) Network analysis of whole-brain fMRI dynamics: a new framework based on dynamic communicability. NeuroImage 201:116007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116007

  9. Güçlü U, van Gerven MAJ (2014) Deep neural networks reveal a gradient in the complexity of neural representations across the brain’s ventral visual pathway. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5023-14.2015, http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.6422, http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5023-14.2015

  10. Han K, Wen H, Shi J, Lu KH, Zhang Y, Fu D, Liu Z (2019) Variational autoencoder: an unsupervised model for encoding and decoding fMRI activity in visual cortex. NeuroImage 198: 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.039

  11. Haxby JV (2012) Multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI: the early beginnings. NeuroImage 62:852–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.016

  12. Haynes JD, Rees G (2005) Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 8:686–691. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1445

  13. Kamitani Y, Tong F (2005) Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain. Nat Neurosci 8:679–685. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1444

  14. Kay K, Naselaris T, Prenger R, Gallant J (2008) Identifying natural images from human brain activity. Nature 452:352–355. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06713

  15. Kriegeskorte N (2011) Pattern-information analysis: from stimulus decoding to computational-model testing. NeuroImage 56:411–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.061

  16. Li X, Zhou Y, Dvornek N, Zhang M, Gao S, Zhuang J, Scheinost D, Staib L, Ventola P, Duncan J (2021) Braingnn: interpretable brain graph neural network for fMRI analysis. Med Image Anal 74:102233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102233

  17. Li Y, Zhang X, Nie J, Zhang G, Fang R, Xu X, Wu Z, Hu D, Wang L, Zhang H, Lin W, Li G (2022) Brain connectivity based graph convolutional networks for infant age prediction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging PP:1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2022.3171778

  18. Meng L, Ge K (2022) Decoding visual fMRI stimuli from human brain based on graph convolutional neural network. Brain Sci 12:1394. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12101394

  19. Mohanty R, Sethares W, Nair V, Prabhakaran V (2020) Rethinking measures of functional connectivity via feature extraction. Sci Rep 10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57915-w

  20. Mozafari M, Reddy L, van Rullen R (2020) Reconstructing natural scenes from fmri patterns using Bigbigan. In: 2020 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN), pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  21. Naselaris T, Kay KN, Nishimoto S, Gallant JL (2011) Encoding and decoding in fMRI. NeuroImage 56:400–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.073

  22. Palazzo S, Spampinato C, Kavasidis I, Giordano D, Schmidt J, Shah M (2020) Decoding brain representations by multimodal learning of neural activity and visual features. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell PP:1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020.2995909

  23. Qiao K, Chen J, Wang L, Zhang C, Tong L, Yan B (202) Reconstructing natural images from human fMRI by alternating encoding and decoding with shared autoencoder regularization. In: Biomedical signal processing and control

    Google Scholar 

  24. Robert T (2019) Improving latent representations of ConvNets for visual understanding. PhD thesis

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thirion B, Duchesnay E, Hubbard E, Dubois J, Poline JB, Lebihan D, Dehaene S (2007) Inverse retinotopy: Inferring the visual content of images from brain activation patterns. NeuroImage 33:1104–1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.062

  26. Wen H, Shi J, Chen W, Liu Z (2018) Deep residual network predicts cortical representation and organization of visual features for rapid categorization. Sci Rep 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22160-9

  27. Wen H, Shi J, Zhang Y, Lu KH, Cao J, Liu Z (2018) Neural encoding and decoding with deep learning for dynamic natural vision. Cerebral Cortex 28:4136–4160. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx268

  28. Wu M, David S, Gallant J (2006) Complete functional characterization of sensory neurons by system identification. Ann Rev Neurosci 29:477–505. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113024

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subhrasankar Chatterjee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chatterjee, S., Samanta, D. (2024). Enhancing Graph-Based Representation Learning with Adversarial Policy Gradient: A Hyperparameter Analysis. In: Kole, D.K., Roy Chowdhury, S., Basu, S., Plewczynski, D., Bhattacharjee, D. (eds) Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Frontiers in Computing and Systems. COMSYS 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 974. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2611-0_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2611-0_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-97-2610-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-97-2611-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation