• 45 Accesses

Abstract

One of the clear findings of this book is the diversity of empirical analysis challenges faced by various fields of economics, as can be seen from the discussions in Part II (Empirical Problems in Each Field of Economics). In labor economics and development economics, the explicit identification of causal relationships is emphasized from the perspective of the credibility of empirical research, with natural experiments (NE) and quasi-experiments (QE) being used in the former, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) being actively used in the latter. On the other hand, in economic history and macroeconomics, the identification of causal relationships through NE, QE, or RCTs is not yet the dominant research method. In the former, quantitative analysis of historical facts is a major challenge, while in the latter, the evaluation of general equilibrium effects of macroeconomic policy is a major issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 111.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
GBP 139.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As mentioned in Chap. 1, the two terms, natural experiment and quasi-experiment, are sometimes used in subtly different ways. However, in this book, we use both without making any particular distinction.

  2. 2.

    This system is called the Real Estate Information Network System (REINS) and is operated in the four regions of Japan. Please refer to http://www.reins.or.jp/about/.

References

  • Brodeur A, Cook N, Heyes A (2020) Methods Matter: p-Hacking and Publication Bias in Causal Analysis in Economics. Am Econ Rev 110(11): 3634–3660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economic Seminar (ed) (2020) Keizai Seminar Zokan: Shinkasuru Bi**esu no Keizaigaku (Economic Seminar Special Issue: Evolving Empirical Analysis of Business, in Japanese), Nihon Hyoron.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glewwe P, Kremer M, Moulin S, Zitzewitz E (2004) Retrospective vs. Prospective Analyses of School Inputs: the Case of Flip Charts in Kenya. J Dev Econ 74(1): 251–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai M, Sakai T (eds) (2022) Sono Bi**esu Kadai Saishin no Keizaigakude Sudeni Kaiketsu Shiteimasu (That business issue has already been ‘solved’ with the latest economics, in Japanese), Nikkei BP

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Otsuka, K., Kurosaki, T., Sawada, Y., Sonobe, T. (2024). Conclusion. In: Otsuka, K., Kurosaki, T., Sawada, Y., Sonobe, T. (eds) Next-Generation of Empirical Research in Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1887-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation