Effect of Guar Gum Biopolymer on Shear Strength and Liquefaction Response of Coal Ash

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference 2022 Volume 3 (IGC 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 478))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 13 Accesses

Abstract

Improvement in geotechnical properties of coal ash is required for its better utilization in large infrastructure projects. Lime and cement are the most commonly used material to stabilize coal ash for railway and highway embankment construction. However, these admixtures have negative impact on the environment. This experimental study explores the viability of commercially available guar gum biopolymer, as an eco-friendly and cost-effective additive for coal ash stabilization. Guar gum biopolymer is chosen because of its pH stability, cold water dissolving characteristics and formation of hydrogen bonds along with being inexpensive. Different concentrations (1–5%) of guar gum biopolymer were used to treat the coal ash collected from Gandhinagar thermal power plant. A series of shear strength tests were conducted on coal ash before and after its treatment with guar gum biopolymer at different concentrations and curing time/conditions. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of guar gum-treated coal ash specimens were also obtained to evaluate the morphological characteristics of stabilized coal ash. Stress–strain and pore pressure response of guar gum treated coal ash were studied by conducting Consolidated Undrained (CU) triaxial tests. Effect of gaur gum on liquefaction response of coal ash was also evaluated by conducting cyclic triaxial tests with pore pressure evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ayeldeen MK, Negm AM, El Sawwaf MA (2016) Evaluating the physical characteristics of biopolymer/soil mixtures. Arab J Geosci 9(5):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ayeldeen M, Negm A, El-Sawwaf M, Kitazume M (2017) Enhancing mechanical behaviors of collapsible soil using two biopolymers. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 9(2):329–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boominathan A, Hari S (2002) Liquefaction strength of coal ash reinforced with randomly distributed fibers. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(9–12):1027–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bremner TW (2001) Environmental aspects of concrete: problems and solutions. In: First All-Russian conference on concrete and reinforced concrete, Moscow, Russia, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chang I, Im J, Prasidhi AK, Cho GC (2015) Effects of xanthan gum biopolymer on soil strengthening. Constr Build Mater 74(1):65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang I, Prasidhi AK, Im J, Cho GC (2015) Soil strengthening using thermogelation biopolymers. Constr Build Mater 77:430–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang I, Prasidhi AK, Im J, Shin HD, Cho GC (2015) Soil treatment using microbial biopolymers for anti-desertification purposes. Geoderma 253:39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen R, Lee I, Zhang L (2015) Biopolymer stabilization of mine tailings for dust control. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141(2):04014100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen R, Zhang L, Budhu M (2013) Biopolymer stabilization of mine tailings. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(10):1802–1807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chore HS, Vaidya MK (2015) Strength characterization of fiber reinforced cement– coal ash mixes. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 1(4):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chudzikowski RJ (1971) Guar gum and its applications. J Soc Cosmet Chem 22(1):43–60

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dehghan H, Tabarsa A, Latifi N, Bagheri Y (2019) Use of xanthan and guar gums in soil strengthening. Clean Technol Environ Policy 21(1):155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dey AK, Gandhi SR (2008) Evaluation of liquefaction potential of pond ash. In: Geotechnical engineering for disaster mitigation and rehabilitation. Springer, Berlin, pp 315–320

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ghosh A, Subbarao C (2007) Strength characteristics of class F coal ash modified with lime and gypsum. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(7):757–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta SC, Hooda KS, Mathur NK, Gupta S (2009) Tailoring of guar gum for desert sand stabilization. Indian J Chem Technol 16(11):507–512

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hataf N, Ghadir P, Ranjbar N (2018) Investigation of soil stabilization using chitosan biopolymer. J Clean Prod 170:1493–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khatami HR, Kelly BCO (2013) Improving mechanical properties of sand using biopolymers. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(8):1402–1406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar JS, Sharma P (2018) Geotechnical properties of pond ash mixed with cement kiln dust and polypropylene fiber. J Mater Civ Eng 30(8):04018154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mohanty S, Patra NR (2014) Cyclic behavior and liquefaction potential of Indian pond ash located in seismic zones III and IV. J Mater Civ Eng 26(7):06014012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mudgil D, Barak S, Khatkar BS (2014) Guar gum: processing, properties and food applications—a review. J Food Sci Technol 51(3):409–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sivapullaiah PV, Moghal AAB (2011) Role of gypsum in the strength development of coal ashes with lime. J Mater Civ Eng 23(2):197–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Smitha S, Sachan A (2016) Use of agar biopolymer to improve the shear strength behavior of sabarmati sand. Int J Geotech Eng 10(4):387–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Usmen MA, Bowders JJ Jr (1990) Stabilization characteristics of class F coal ash. Transp Res Rec 1288:59–69

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zand B, Tu W, Amaya PJ, Wolfe WE, Butalia TS (2009) An experimental investigation on liquefaction potential and post-liquefaction shear strength of impounded coal ash. Fuel 88(7):1160–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aparna Shrivastava .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shrivastava, A., Saxena, A., Sachan, A. (2024). Effect of Guar Gum Biopolymer on Shear Strength and Liquefaction Response of Coal Ash. In: Jose, B.T., Sahoo, D.K., Puppala, A.J., Reddy, C.N.V.S., Abraham, B.M., Vaidya, R. (eds) Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference 2022 Volume 3. IGC 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 478. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1745-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1745-3_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-97-1744-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-97-1745-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation