Implementation of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Gait Alteration Classification of the Human Foot

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Mechanical Engineering, Volume 1 (ICMech-REC 2023)

Abstract

It is very challenging for amputees to walk and adapt to uneven surfaces. It is essential to classify different gait surfaces so that intelligent prostheses can be designed for automatic gait adjustment. In this study, supervised machine learning algorithms are used for the gait classification of uneven surfaces. Gait pattern plays a significant role in human movement. Inertia measuring unit (IMU) sensor data is used, which is mounted on the right shank body part. Acceleration data in the x-direction is used for the gait classification of uneven surfaces. Nine different surfaces, namely data slope down, slope up, stair down, stair up, bank right, bank left, cobble stone, grass, and flat even, are studied. Fourteen features, namely mean, RMS, kurtosis, standard deviation, crest factor, skewness, shape indicator, clearance indicator, min, impulse indicator, range, max, margin factor, and energy, are extracted from the data. Supervised machine learning algorithms namely K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), Ensemble classifier and Neural network (NN) are employed for gait classification. A maximum gait classification accuracy of 87% is obtained for the subspace discriminant ensemble classifier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Goujon-Pillet H, Drevelle X, Bonnet X, Villa C, Martinet N, Sauret C, Bascou J, Loiret I, Djian F, Rapin N (2014) APSIC: “Training and fitting amputees during situations of daily living.” IRBM 35:60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Labarrière F, Thomas E, Calistri L, Optasanu V, Gueugnon M, Ornetti P, Laroche D (2020) Machine learning approaches for activity recognition and/or activity prediction in locomotion assistive devices a systematic review. Sensors 20:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Johansson JL, Sherrill DM, Riley PO, Bonato P, Herr H (2005) A clinical comparison of variable-dam** and mechanically passive prosthetic knee devices. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 84:563–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Au SK, Weber JA, Herr HM (2009) Powered ankle foot prosthesis improves walking metabolic economy. IEEE Trans Robot 25:51–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chauhan P, Singh AK, Raghuwanshi NK (2022) The state of art review on prosthetic feet and its significance to imitate the biomechanics of human ankle-foot. Mater Today Proc 62:6364–6370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tedesco S, Barton J, O’Flynn B (2017) A review of activity trackers for senior citizens: research perspectives, commercial landscape and the role of the insurance industry. Sensors 17(6):1–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chauhan P, Singh AK, Raghuwanshi NK, Rathore R (2023) Experimental investigation of gait parameters and stability analysis for unilateral transtibial amputee. Sadhana 48:271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen Y-P, Yang J-Y, Liou S-N, Lee G-Y, Wang JeenShing (2008) Online classifier construction algorithm for human activity detection using a tri-axial accelerometer. Appl Math Comput 205(2):849–860

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Reenalda J, Maartens E, Homan, L, Buurke JJ (2016) Continuous three dimensional analysis of running mechanics during a marathon by means of inertial magnetic measurement units to objectify changes in running mechanics. J Biomech 49(14):3362–3367

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lim S, D’Souza C (2019) Statistical prediction of load carriage mode and magnitude from inertial sensor derived gait kinematics. Appl Ergon 76:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Muller A, Pontonnier C, Robert-Lachaine X, Dumont G, Plamondon A (2020) Motion- based prediction of external forces and moments and back loading during manual material handling tasks. Appl Ergon 82:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hu B, Li S, Chen Y, Kavi R, Coppola S (2021) Applying deep neural networks and inertial measurement unit in recognising irregular walking differences in the real world. Appl Ergon 96:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fairhurst SR, Koehler-McNicholas SR, Slater BC, Nickel EA, Koester KA, Voss GO, Ferguson JE (2017)Improving automatic control of an ankle-foot prosthesis using machine learning algorithms. Front Biomed Devices. 40672:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  14. Johnny DF, Natlie B, Edward DL: Gait phase detection from thigh kinematics using machine learning techniques. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on medical measurements and applications, pp 263–268

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ferdous W, Rezaul KB, Chris JH, Saman H, David CA (2015) Classification of parkinson’s disease gait using spatial-temporal gait features. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 19:1794–1802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Elham D, Babak T, Alex M (2016) Automated classification of pathological gait after stroke using ubiquitous sensing technology. In: Proceedings of the 38th annual international conference of the ieee engineering in medicine and biology society, pp 6150–6153

    Google Scholar 

  17. Manap HH, Tahir NM, Yassin AIM (2011) Statistical analysis of parkinson disease gait classification using artificial neural network. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on signal processing and information technology, pp 60–65

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lee SS, Choi ST, Choi SI (2019) Classification of gait type based on deep learning using various sensors with smart insole. Sensors 19(8):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee SM, Yoon SM, Cho H, Human activity recognition from accelerometer data using Convolutional Neural Network. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on big data and smart computing, pp 131–134

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wu J, Wang J, Liu L (2007) Feature extraction via KPCA for classification of gait patterns. Hum Mov Sci 26:393–411

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chen L, Yang P, Xu X, Zu L, Guo X (2008) Above-knee prosthesis control based on posture recognition by support vector machine. IEEE conference on robotics, automation and mechatronics, pp 307–312

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kasnesis, P., Patrikakis, C. Z., & Venieris, I. S. PerceptionNet: “A deep convolutional neural network for late sensor fusion”. In Intelligent Systems and Applications: Proceedings of the 2018 Intelligent Systems Conference, Volume 1, pp. 101–119, (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ai Q, Zhang Y, Qi W, Liu Q, Chen K (2017) Research on lower limb motion recognition based on fusion of EMG and accelerometer signals. Symmetry 9(8):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang J, Cao D, Wang J, Liu C (2021) Action recognition of lower limbs based on surface electromyography weighted feature method. Sensors 21(18):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Luo Y, Coppola SM, Dixon PC, Li S, Dennerlein JT, Hu B (2020) A database of human gait performance on irregular and uneven surfaces collected by wearable sensors. Scientific data 7(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ranawat NS, Prakash J, Miglani A, Kankar PK (2023) Performance evaluation of LSTM and Bi-LSTM using non-convolutional features for blockage detection in centrifugal pump. Eng Appl Artif Intell 122:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ranawat NS, Miglani A, Kankar PK (2023) Blockage detection in centrifugal pump using butterfly optimization-based feature selection. Mapan 38:499–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ranawat NS, Kankar PK, Miglani A (2020) Fault diagnosis in centrifugal pump using support vector machine and artificial neural network. J Eng Res EMSME 99:99–111

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ranawat NS, Prakash J, Miglani A, Kankar PK (2023) Fuzzy recurrence plots for shallow learning-based blockage detection in a centrifugal pump using pre-trained image recognition models. ASME J Comput Inf Sci Eng 23(5):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Preeti Chauhan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chauhan, P., Raghuwanshi, N.K., Singh, A.K. (2024). Implementation of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Gait Alteration Classification of the Human Foot. In: Raghavendra, G., Deepak, B.B.V.L., Gupta, M. (eds) Recent Advances in Mechanical Engineering, Volume 1. ICMech-REC 2023. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0918-2_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0918-2_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-97-0917-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-97-0918-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation