Urban Waterlogging Prediction Based on Feature Extraction and Transfer

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Frontiers of Energy and Environmental Engineering (CFEEE 2023 2023)

Part of the book series: Environmental Science and Engineering ((ESE))

  • 54 Accesses

Abstract

In waterlogging prediction, all or part of the real-time waterlogging data may be missing due to sensor failure, too sparse sampling interval setting, or sensor sensitivity problems, resulting in the failure of waterlogging prediction. In this study, we propose an urban waterlogging depth prediction method based on the transfer of waterlogging point feature extraction. The method quantifies the relationship between rainfall and waterlogging depth by extracting and constructing rainfall features at waterlogging points. Using only current or future rainfall data as model input to achieve future waterlogging depth prediction, it can effectively overcome the limitations of sparse distribution of monitoring stations and insufficient current real-time waterlogging data and can achieve more accurate medium-term waterlogging prediction and transfer prediction of water level at potential waterlogging-prone points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chau K, Wu C, Li YS (2005) Comparison of several flood forecasting models in Yangtze River. J Hydrol Eng 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding Y, Zhu Y, Feng J et al (2020) Interpretable spatio-temporal attention LSTM model for flood forecasting. Neurocomputing 403:348–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Q, Liu J, Gong J (2015) Urban flood map** based on unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing and random forest classifier—a case of Yuyao, China. Water 7(12):1437–1455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira C, Walsh RPD, Shakesby R et al Differences in overland flow, hydrophobicity and soil moisture dynamics between Mediterranean woodland types in a peri-urban catchment in Portugal. J Hydrol 533 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunawan D, Sembiring C, Budiman M (2018) The Implementation of cosine similarity to calculate text relevance between two documents. J Phys: Conf Ser 978(1):012120

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim B, Sanders BF, Famiglietti JS et al (2015) Urban flood modeling with porous shallow-water equations: a case study of model errors in the presence of anisotropic porosity. J Hydrol 523:680–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le XH, Ho H, Lee G et al (2019) Application of long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network for flood forecasting. Water 11:1387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Kiaghadi A, Dawson C (2021) Exploring the best sequence LSTM modeling architecture for flood prediction. Neural Comput Appl 33:1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Munawar HS, Hammad AWA, Waller ST (2022) Remote sensing methods for flood prediction: a review. Sensors (Basel) 22(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghavendra NS, Deka PC (2014) Support vector machine applications in the field of hydrology: a review. Appl Soft Comput 19:372–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taver V, Johannet A, Borrell Estupina V et al (2014) Feed-forward vs recurrent neural network models for non-stationarity modelling using data assimilation and adaptivity. Hydrol Sci J 60

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Wang H, Wu Z et al (2021) Using multi-factor analysis to predict urban flood depth based on Naive Bayes. Water 13:432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Jian X, Chen Y et al (2023) Urban waterlogging prediction and risk analysis based on rainfall time series features: a case study of Shenzhen. Front Environ Sci 11:1131954

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zongjia Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, Z., Jian, X., Chen, Y., Huang, Z., Yang, L. (2024). Urban Waterlogging Prediction Based on Feature Extraction and Transfer. In: Wen, F., Zhu, J. (eds) Frontiers of Energy and Environmental Engineering. CFEEE 2023 2023. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0372-2_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation