Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM), is also known as rapid prototy**, is considered as a revolution in field of manufacturing and fabrications and boosted the development in biomedical fabrication. The 3D printing technique is mostly utilized in the field of medical for the manufacturing of medical equipment and surgical equipment, especially 3D biomedical printing which means 3D printing of substance which are biologically compatible to human body, blood and cells in the field of tissue fabrications. The main aim of tissue fabrications and engineering is to produce the artificial organ which is functional and viable. To fulfill this objective, investigation of various manufacturing techniques and materials is required. The process is difficult as it includes multiple aspects of human physiology, like types of multiple cell culturing, vasculature, nerve innervation, and interactions with nearby cells. This paper objective is to find the suitable material, is difficult task and, need in-depth focus on why it is difficult & what are the factors influencing the negative role of effective utilization of 3D printing tissue engineering. Also, this paper focuses on comparative study of materials in economic perspective human organ manufacturing. At the end, the conclusion elaborates about the applications and challenges of additive manufacturing in medical field and the alternative materials for organ tissue manufacturing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wang, X., Ao, Q., Tian, X., Fan, J., Tong, H., Hou, W., & Bai, S. (2017). Gelatin-Based hydrogels for organ 3D bioprinting. Polymers, 9(12), 401.
Vienken, J. (2002). Polymers in nephrology characteristics and needs. The International Journal of Artificial Organs, *(5), 470–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/039139880202500518
Nahmias, Y., Arneja, A., Tower, T. T., Renn, M. J., & Odde, D. J. (2005). Cell patterning on biological gels via cell spraying through a mask. Tissue Engineering, 11(5–6), 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2005.11.701.
Wang, X., Yan, Y., & Zhang, R. (2007). Rapid prototy** as a tool for manufacturing bioartificial livers. Trends in Biotechnology, 25(11), 505–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.08.010.
Li, M. G., Tian, X. Y., & Chen, X. B. (2009). A brief review of dispensing-based rapid prototy** techniques in tissue scaffold fabrication: The role of modelling on scaffold properties prediction. Biofabrication, 1(3), 032001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/1/3/032001.
Wang, X., Yan, Y., & Zhang, R. (2010). Recent trends and challenges in complex organ manufacturing. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews, 16(2), 189–197.
Chmielewski, A. G. (2010). Chitosan and radiation chemistry. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 79(3), 272–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2009.11.002.
Kalita, S. J. (2010). Rapid prototy** in biomedical engineering: structural intricacies of biological materials. Bio-integration of Medical Implant Materials, 349–397.
Rath, S. N., Pryymachuk, G., Bleiziffer, O. A., Lam, C. X. F., Arkudas, A., & Ho, S. T. B. (2011). Hyaluronan-based heparin-incorporated hydrogels for the generation of axially vascularized bioartificial bone tissues: In vitro and in vivo evaluation in a PLDLLA–TCP–PCL-composite system. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 22(5), 1279–1291.
Guvendiren, M., Lu, H. D., & Burdick, J. A. (2012). Shear-thinning hydrogels for biomedical applications. Soft Matter, 8(2), 260–272.
Wang, X. (2012). Intelligent freeform manufacturing of complex organs. Artificial Organs, 36(11), 951–959. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.2012.01499.x.
Marga, F., Jakab, K., Khatiwala, C., Shepherd, B., Dorfman, S., & Hubbard, B. (2012). Toward engineering functional organ modules by additive manufacturing. Biofabrication, 4(2), 022001.
IKADA, Y. (2001). Biocompatibility of hydrogels. Gels Handbook, 388–407.
Zhu, J., Zhang, Y., Xu, N., Wang, L., **ang, X., & Zhu, X. (2013). The preparation of PLL–GRGDS modified PTSG copolymer scaffolds and their effects on manufacturing artificial salivary gland. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, 24(15), 1721–1739.
Ahmed, E. M. (2015). Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications: A review. Journal of Advanced Research, 6(2), 105–121.
Murphy, S. V., & Atala, A. (2014). 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nature Biotechnology, 32(8), 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958.
Li, Jianyu, Suo, Zhigang, & Vlassak, Joost J. (2014). Stiff, strong, and tough hydrogels with good chemical stability. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2(39), 6708–6713.
Ahn, S. H., Lee, J., Park, S. A., & Kim, W. D. (2016). Three-dimensional bioprinting equipment technologies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 13(6), 663–676.
Park, S.-H., Jung, C. S., & Min, B.-H. (2016). Advances in three-dimensional bioprinting for hard tissue engineering. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 13(6), 622–635.
Agarwala, S. (2016). A perspective on 3D bioprinting technology: Present and future. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 9(4), 931.
Zadpoor, A. A., & Malda, J. (2016). Additive manufacturing of biomaterials, tissues, and organs. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 45(1), 1–11.
Zhang, Y. S., Yue, K., Aleman, J., Mollazadeh-Moghaddam, K., Bakht, S. M., & Yang, J. (2016). 3D bioprinting for tissue and organ fabrication. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 45(1), 148–163.
Naseer, S. M., Manbachi, A., Samandari, M., Walch, P., Gao, Y., & Zhang, Y. S. (2017). Surface acoustic waves induced micropatterning of cells in gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biofabrication, 9(1), 015020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa585e.
Ratheesh, G., Venugopal, J. R., Chinappan, A., Ezhilarasu, H., Sadiq, A., & Ramakrishna, S. (2017). 3D fabrication of polymeric scaffolds for regenerative therapy. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 3(7), 1175–1194.
Wu, D., Yu, Y., Tan, J., Huang, L., Luo, B., Lu, L. et al. (2018). 3D bioprinting of gellan gum and poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate based hydrogels to produce human-scale constructs with high-fidelity. Materials & Design.
Saroia, J., Yanen, W., Wei, Q., Zhang, K., Lu, T., & Zhang, B. (2018). A review on biocompatibility nature of hydrogels with 3D printing techniques, tissue engineering application and its future prospective. Bio-Design and Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-018-0029-7.
Gupta, S., Bissoyi, A., & Bit, A. (2018). A review on 3D printable techniques for tissue engineering. BioNanoScience.
Holzmeister, I., Schamel, M., Groll, J., Gbureck, U., & Vorndran, E. (2018). Artificial inorganic biohybrids: The functional combination of microorganisms and cells with inorganic materials. Acta Biomaterialia, 74, 17–35.
Macko, M., Szczepański, Z., Mikołajewski, D., Nowak, J., Mikołajewska, E., & Furtak, J. (2019). CAE/FDM methods for design and manufacture artificial organs for exercises purposes. Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences, 462–469.
Landers, R., & Mulhaupt, R. (2000). Desktop manufacturing of complex objects, prototypes and biomedical scaffolds utilizing computer-assisted design combined with computer-guided 3D plotting of polymers and reactive oligomers. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 282, 17–21.
Deliormanlı, A. M. (2019). Direct Write Assembly of Graphene/Poly(ε-Caprolactone) Composite Scaffolds and Evaluation of Their Biological Performance Using Mouse Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology.
Wenger R. & Giraud M.(2018). 3D Printing Applied to Tissue-Engineered Vascular Grafts. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8122631.
Matai, I., Kaur, G., Seyedsalehi, A., McClinton, A., & Laurencin, C. T. (2019). Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering. Biomaterials, 119536.
Kou, G., Ergu, D., Chen, Y., & Lin, C. (2016). Pairwise comparison matrix in multiple criteria decision making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22(5), 738–765.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Budhiraja, S., Ashok, P.P., Mathiyazhagan, K. (2021). Challenges and Materials in Artificial Organ Manufacturing. In: Sharma, B.P., Rao, G.S., Gupta, S., Gupta, P., Prasad, A. (eds) Advances in Engineering Materials . Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6029-7_59
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6029-7_59
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-33-6028-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-33-6029-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)