SpringerLink
Log in

Unraveling the Intelligent Dynamic Accounting Information System and Circular Economy Capabilities as the Enablers on Route to Reaching Sustainability-Oriented Innovation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Contemporary Economic Issues in Asian Countries: Proceeding of CEIAC 2022, Volume 1 (CEIAC 2022)

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Although circular economy (CE) has been well-acknowledged as the predominant part of advanced approach to reach sustainability paradigm, CE implementation has been still in the nascent stage of development. Research has neglected to connect CE and sustainability-oriented innovation (SOI). While CE studies focused in enterprise and supply chain, there has been limited works delving into how public sector organizations (PSOs) could prepare for CE adoption to achieve the SOI. This research aims at exploring the mechanism of how intelligent dynamics accounting information system capabilities (IDAISC) promotes circular economy capabilities (CEC) which, in turn, facilitates SOI achievement in PSOs. Methodologically, this research was quantitative with a correlational scope and cross-sectional design. The significance and relevance of a series of research hypotheses in the proposed model were investigated through leveraging the partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach on the statistical data captured from the convenient and snowball sample of 512 respondents. Analytical outcomes discerned that the fixable accounting information system (FAIS) and business process capabilities (BPC) of IDAISC were the enablers of CEC enhancement. This research further adduced that pursuit of CEC would result in reaching the SOI. Beyond the provision of scientific understandings through broadening the prevailing frontiers of this research string, the culmination of this study would serve as a stable cornerstone to generate research pointers for follow-up works. In the practical points of view, such valuable understandings could allow to formulate targeted strategies as well as rules and regulations for promoting the SOI in PSOs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul-Rashid, S. H., Sakundarini, N., Ariffin, R., & Ramayah, T. (2017). Drivers for the adoption of sustainable manufacturing practices: A Malaysia perspective. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 18(11), 1619–1631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-017-0191-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Denyer, D., & Overy, P. (2015). Sustainability-oriented Innovation: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), 180–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hattami, H. M., Hashed, A. A., Alnuzaili, K. M., & Alsoufi, M. A. Z. (2021). Effect of risk of using computerized AIS on external auditor’s work quality in Yemen. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 8(1), 75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Matari, A. S., Amiruddin, R., Aziz, K. A., & Al-Sharafi, M. A. (2022). The impact of dynamic accounting information system on organizational resilience: The mediating role of business processes capabilities. Sustainability, 14, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14094967

  • Andersen, M. S. (2006). An introductory note on the environmental economics of the circular economy. Sustainability Science, 2(1), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-006-0013-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andiana, B. D. L. (2022). Recording of cash expenditures and receipts in school operational assistance funds (BOS) based on accounting information systems at MA Plus Al-Ittihad. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(1), 3241–3247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askary, S., Abu-Ghazaleh, N., & Tahat, Y. A. (2018). Artificial intelligence and reliability of accounting information. Challenges and Opportunities in the Digital Era, 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02131-3_28

  • Bag, S., Pretorius, J. H. C., Gupta, S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020). Role of institutional pressures and resources in the adoption of big data analytics powered artificial intelligence, sustainable manufacturing practices and circular economy capabilities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120420

  • Baryannis, G., Validi, S., Dani, S., & Antoniou, G. (2018). Supply chain risk management and artificial intelligence: state of the art and future research directions. International Journal of Production Research, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1530476

  • Bleady, A., Ali, A. H., & Ibrahim, S. B. (2018). Dynamic capabilities theory: Pinning down a shifting concept. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 22(2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., Bocken, N., & Balkenende, R. (2019). Why Do Companies pursue collaborative circular oriented innovation? Sustainability, 11(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, S., Jun, M., & Yang, Z. (2010). Implementing supply chain information integration in China: the role of institutional forces and trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, N., Chaim, O., Cazarini, E., & Gerolamo, M. (2018). Manufacturing in the fourth industrial revolution: A positive prospect in Sustainable Manufacturing. Procedia Manufacturing, 21, 671–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dey, P. K., Malesios, C., De, D., Chowdhury, S., & Abdelaziz, F. B. (2020). The impact of lean management practices and sustainably-oriented innovation on sustainability performance of small and medium-sized enterprises: Empirical evidence from the UK. British Journal of Management, 31(1), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Bryde, D. J., Giannakis, M., Foropon, C., Roubaud, D., & Hazen, B. T. (2020). Big data analytics and artificial intelligence pathway to operational performance under the effects of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental dynamism: A study of manufacturing organisations. International Journal of Production Economics, 226, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Fosso Wamba, S., Roubaud, D., & Foropon, C. (2019). Empirical investigation of data analytics capability and organizational flexibility as complements to supply chain resilience. International Journal of Production Research, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1582820

  • Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichter, K., & Clausen, J. (2016). Diffusion Dynamics of sustainable innovation—Insights on diffusion patterns based on the analysis of 100 sustainable product and service innovation. Innovation Management, 4(2), 30–67. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_004.002_0004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

  • French, M. L., & LaForge, R. L. (2006). Closed-loop supply chains in process industries: An empirical study of producer re-use issues. Journal of Operations Management, 24(3), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grande, E. U., Estébanez, R. P., & Colomina, C. M. (2011). The impact of accounting information systems (AIS) on performance measures: Empirical evidence in spanish SMEs. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 11(1), 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., Chen, H., Hazen, B. T., Kaur, S., & Santibañez Gonzalez, E. D. R. (2018). Circular economy and big data analytics: A stakeholder perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.030

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Business Research, 109, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M, & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2018). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. (2010). Accounting information systems. South-Western Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-09-2015-0382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan, D., de Jabbour, A. B. L., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2014). Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company. European Operational Research, 233(2), 432–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.07.023

  • Kaya, B., Abubakar, A. M., Behravesh, E., Yildiz, H., & Mert, I. S. (2020). Antecedents of innovative performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fuzzy sets (fsQCA). Journal of Business Research, 114, 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, O., Daddi, T., & Iraldo, F. (2020). The role of dynamic capabilities in circular economy implementation and performance of companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2020

  • Klewitz, J., & Hansen, E. G. (2014). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: A systematic review. Cleaner Production, 65, 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, H. S., Mosgaard, M. A., & Remmen, A. (2021). Integrating circular principles in environmental management systems. Cleaner Production, 286, 125485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarevic, D., & Valve, H. (2017). Narrating expectations for the circular economy: Towards a common and contested European transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 31, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I., & Shin, Y. J. (2020). Machine learning for enterprises: Applications, algorithm selection, and challenges. Business Horizons, 63(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Song, H. T., & Yoo, J.-M. (2007). Present status of the recycling of waste electrical and electronic equipment in Korea. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 50(4), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lönnqvist, A., & Pirttimäki, V. (2006). The measurement of business intelligence. Information Systems Management, 23(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1201/1078.10580530/45769.23.1.20061201/91770.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubberink, R., Blok, V., van Ophem, J., & Omta, O. (2017). Lessons for responsible innovation in the business context: A systematic literature review of responsible, social and sustainable innovation practices. Sustainability, 9(5), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüdeke-Freund, F., Bohnsack, R., Breuer, H., & Massa, L. (2018). Research on sustainable business model patterns: Status quo, methodological issues, and a research agenda. Sustainable Business Models, 25–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93275-0_2

  • Lutfi, A., Al-Okaily, M., Alsyouf, A., & Alrawad, M. (2022). Evaluating the D&M IS success model in the context of accounting information system and sustainable decision making. Sustainability, 14, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138120

  • Munoko, I., Brown-Liburd, H. L., & Vasarhelyi, M. (2020). The ethical implications of using artificial intelligence in auditing. Business Ethics, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04407-1

  • Nagatsu, M., Davis, T., DesRoches, C. T., Koskinen, I., MacLeod, M., Stojanovic, M., & Thorén, H. (2020). Philosophy of science for sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00832-8

  • Narayan, R., & Tidström, A. (2019). Circular economy inspired imaginaries for sustainable innovations. Seamless Learning, 393–413,. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97385-2_21

  • Nogueiro, L., & Ramos, T. B. (2014). The integration of environmental practices and tools in the Portuguese local public administration. Cleaner Production, 76, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormazabal, M., Prieto-Sandoval, V., Puga-Leal, R., & Jaca, C. (2018). Circular economy in Spanish SMEs: Challenges and opportunities. Cleaner Production, 185, 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.031

  • Paschen, J., Kietzmann, J., & Kietzmann, T. C. (2019). Artificial intelligence (AI) and its implications for market knowledge in B2B marketing. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 34(7), 1410–1419. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-10-2018-0295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, A., & Green, P. (2015). Organizational competencies and dynamic accounting information system capability: Impact on AIS processes and firm performance. Journal of Information Systems, 29(3), 123–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, F. (2016). Overall framework design of an intelligent dynamic accounting information platform based on the internet of things. International Journal of Online Engineering, 12(5), 14–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rai, A., & Tang, X. (2010). Leveraging IT capabilities and competitive process capabilities for the management of interorganizational relationship portfolios. Information Systems Research, 21(3), 516–542. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rattalino, F. (2017). Circular advantage anyone? Sustainability-driven innovation and circularity at Patagonia, Inc. Thunderbird International Business Review, 60(5), 747–755. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21917

  • Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Cuevas-, A., Chowdhury, S., Díaz-Acevedo, N., Albores, P., Despoudi, S., Malesios, C., & Dey, P. (2022). The role of circular economy principles and sustainable-oriented innovation to enhance social, economic and environmental performance: Evidence from Mexican SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 248, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108495

  • Sarstedt, M., Diamantopoulos, A., Salzberger, T., & Baumgartner, P. (2016). Selecting single items to measure doubly concrete constructs: A cautionary tale. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3159–3167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrake, S. O., Landis A. E., & Bilec, M. M. (2011). Greening the service industries: A case study of a United States engineering consulting firm. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology, Chicago, IL, USA, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/issst.2011.5936881

  • Sivarajah, U., Kamal, M. M., Irani, Z., & Weerakkody, V. (2017). Critical analysis of Big Data challenges and analytical methods. Journal of Business Research, 70, 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3c509::aid-smj882%3e3.0.co;2-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, G. J., Prabhu, J. C., & Chandy, R. K. (2009). Radical innovation across nations: The preeminence of corporate culture. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.1.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, A. B., & Douglas, E. T. (2000). Measuring the flexibility of information technology infrastructure: Exploratory analysis of a construct. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(1), 167–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2000.11045632

  • Torres, R., Sidorova, A., & Jones, M. C. (2018). Enabling firm performance through business intelligence and analytics: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Information & Management, 55, 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unob, F., Wongsiri, B., Phaeon, N., Puanngam, M., & Shiowatana, J. (2007). Reuse of waste silica as adsorbent for metal removal by iron oxide modification. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 142(1–2), 455–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.08.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ur Rehman, S., Bhatti, A., & Chaudhry, N. I. (2019). Mediating effect of innovative culture and organizational learning between leadership styles at third-order and organizational performance in Malaysian SMEs. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-019-0159-1

  • Uwizeyemungu, S., & Raymond, L. (2012). Impact of an ERP system’s capabilities upon the realisation of its business value: A resource-based perspective. Information Technology and Management, 13(2), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-012-0118-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Holt, T., Statler, M., Atz, U., Whelan, T., Loggerenberg, M., & Cebulla, J. (2020). The cultural consensus of sustainability‐driven innovation: Strategies for success. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2584

  • Wang, C. L., Senaratne, C., & Rafiq, M. (2014). Success traps, dynamic capabilities and firm performance. British Journal of Management, 26(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkerson, B., & Trellevik, L.-K.L. (2021). Sustainability-oriented innovation: Improving problem definition through combined design thinking and systems map** approaches. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasmin, M., Tatoglu, E., Kilic, H. S., Zaim, S., & Delen, D. (2020). Big data analytics capabilities and firm performance: An integrated MCDM approach. Journal of Business Research, 114, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikuni, A. C., Galvão, F. R., & Albertin, A. L. (2022). Knowledge strategy planning and information system strategies enable dynamic capabilities innovation capabilities impacting firm performance. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 52(4), 508–530. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-07-2020-0128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y., Junjan, V., Yazan, D. M., & Iacob, M.-E. (2022). A systematic literature review on Circular Economy implementation in the construction industry: A policy-making perspective. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 183, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, K.-H., Wu, R., & Bentler, P. M. (2011). Ridge structural equation modelling with correlation matrices for ordinal and continuous data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 64(1), 107–133. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711010x497442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, H., Chen, X., **ao, X., & Zhou, Z. (2017). Institutional pressures, sustainable supply chain management, and circular economy capability: Empirical evidence from Chinese eco-industrial park firms. Cleaner Production, 155, 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, G., Zhang, C., Li, Z., Ding, K., & Wang, C. (2019). Knowledge-driven digital twin manufacturing cell towards intelligent manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1607978

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Geng, Y. (2005). Green supply chain management in China: Pressures, practices and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(5), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510593148

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Accounting, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City (UEH), Ho Chi Minh City¸, Vietnam

    Huy Quang Pham & Phuc Kien Vu

Authors
  1. Huy Quang Pham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Phuc Kien Vu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huy Quang Pham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. VNU University of Economics and Business, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam

    An Thinh Nguyen

  2. World Agroforestry Center, Center for International Forestry Research, Hanoi, Vietnam

    Thu Thuy Pham

  3. Department of Economics, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea (Republic of)

    Joon Song

  4. Department of Economics, Tamkang University, New Taipei City, Taiwan

    Yen-Ling Lin

  5. VNU University of Economics and Business, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam

    Manh Cuong Dong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pham, H.Q., Vu, P.K. (2023). Unraveling the Intelligent Dynamic Accounting Information System and Circular Economy Capabilities as the Enablers on Route to Reaching Sustainability-Oriented Innovation. In: Nguyen, A.T., Pham, T.T., Song, J., Lin, YL., Dong, M.C. (eds) Contemporary Economic Issues in Asian Countries: Proceeding of CEIAC 2022, Volume 1. CEIAC 2022. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9669-6_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation