SpringerLink
Log in

Develo** a Water Disclosure Index: An Integrative Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Business Research

  • 456 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the research methodology of an integrative perspective in develo** and testing a water disclosure index. The problem that motivated this study is that various water accounting (reporting) frameworks may lead to disclosure inconsistencies and incomparability. Furthermore, integrated reporting (IR) is central to this study by incorporating its principles into the new index. However, its value is still questionable. Against this background, the study’s main objective was to evaluate whether the concept of IR and an integrative approach are associated with improved water disclosure in the food, beverage, and tobacco industry. The secondary objectives were firstly to develop a new water disclosure index, and secondly, to test whether there were differences in the water disclosure quality of selected companies between IR-adopted companies versus those still using traditional stand-alone sustainable reporting (non-IR). A post-positivistic research paradigm was selected to reach the objective, which embraces the mixed-method data handling approach. Data were collected and analyzed from reports of 49 selected food, beverage, and tobacco companies listed in Australia, South Africa, and globally. Within the context of the stakeholder and legitimacy theories, this study confirmed that an integrative approach is associated with improved water reporting practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antwi, S. K., & Hamza, K. (2015). Qualitative and quantitative research paradigms in business research: A philosophical reflection. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(3), 217–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. C., Campbell, D., & Shrives, P. J. (2010). Content analysis in environmental reporting research: Enrichment and rehearsal of the method in a British-German context. The British Accounting Review, 42(3), 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi, C., & Stark, A. W. (2018). Environmental, social and governance disclosure, integrated reporting, and the accuracy of analyst forecasts. The British Accounting Review, 50, 16–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besada, H., & Werner, K. (2014). An assessment of the effects of Africa’s water crisis on food security and management. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 31(1), 120–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya, A. (2014). Factors associated with the social and environmental reporting of Australian companies. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 8(1), 25–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1036–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, X., Wallington, K., Shafiee-Jood, M., & Marston, L. (2018). Understanding and managing the food-energy-water nexus—Opportunities for water resources research. Advances in Water Resources, 111, 259–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CDP (Carbon Disclosure Project). (2015). Accelerating action: CDP global water report 2015. Cdp Worldwide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, K., Godfrey, J. M., & Lynch, B. (2012a). Regulatory theory insights into the past, present and future of general purpose water accounting standard setting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 25(6), 1001–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, K., Godfrey, J., & Potter, B. (2012b). Discipline-informed approaches to water accounting. Australian Accounting Review, 22(3), 275–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, M. C., Watson, J., & Woodliff, D. (2014). Corporate governance quality and CSR disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(1), 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. C., & Roberts, R. W. (2010). Toward a more coherent understanding of the organization-society relationship: A theoretical consideration for social and environmental accounting research. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(4), 651–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, C. H., Michelon, G., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2015). CSR disclosure: The more things change…? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 28(1), 14–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhuri, A., & Chakraborty, J. (2009). An insight into sustainability reporting. IUP Journal of Management Research, 8(4), 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, M., & Sojamo, S. (2012). From risks to shared value? Corporate strategies in building a global water accounting and disclosure regime. Water Alternatives, 5(3), 636–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danoucaras, A. N., Woodley, A. P., & Moran, C. J. (2014). The robustness of mine water accounting over a range of operating contexts and commodities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 727–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Villiers, C., Rinaldi, L., & Unerman, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1042–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, A. S., Strydom, H., Schulze, S., & Patel, L. (2011). The sciences and the professions. In A. S. De Vos, H. Strydom, C. B. Fouché, & C. S. L. Delport (Eds.), Research at grass roots: for the social sciences and human service professions (4th ed., pp. 3–27). Van Schaik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C. (2014). An overview of legitimacy theory as applied within the social and environmental accounting literature. In J. Bebbington, J. Unerman, & B. O’dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (2nd ed., pp. 248–272). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C., & Blomquist, C. (2006). Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(4–5), 343–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delport, C. S. L., & De Vos, A. S. (2011). Professional research and professional practice. In A. S. De Vos, H. Strydom, C. B. Fouché & C. S. L. Delport (Eds.), Research at grass roots: For the social sciences and human service professions (4th ed., pp. 45–60). Van Schaik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delport, C. S. L., & Roestenburg, W. J. H. (2011). Quantitative data-collection methods: questionnaires, checklists, structured observation and structured interview schedules. In A. S. De Vos, H. Strydom, C. B. Fouché, & C. S. L. Delport (Eds.), Research at grass roots: For the social sciences and human service professions (4th ed., pp. 171–205). Van Schaik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, S., Burritt, R., & Qian, W. (2014). Salient stakeholders in corporate social responsibility reporting by Chinese mining and minerals companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durrheim, K. (2006). Research design. In M. Terre Blanche, K. Durrheim, & D. Painter (Eds.), Research in practice: Applied methods for the social sciences (2nd ed., pp. 33–59). University of Cape Town Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. G., & Serafeim, G. (2011). Accelerating integrated reporting. In F. De Leo & M. Vollbracht (Eds.), CSR index 2011 (pp. 70–92). InnoVatio Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egberg Thyme, K., Wiberg, B., Lundman, B. & Graneheim, U. H. (2013). Qualitative content analysis in art psychotherapy research: Concepts, procedures, and measures to reveal the latent meaning in pictures and the words attached to the pictures. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 40(1), 101–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, A., McAllister, M. L., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2012). Sustainability reporting among mining corporations: A constructive critique of the GRI approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 70–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouché, C. B., & Delport, C. S. L. (2011). Introduction to the research process. In A.S. De Vos, H. Strydom, C. B. Fouché & C. S. L. Delport (Eds.), Research at grass roots: For the social sciences and human service professions (4th ed., pp. 61–76). Van Schaik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frías-Aceituno, J. V., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2013). Is integrated reporting determined by a country’s legal system? An exploratory study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 44, 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, J. M. (2011). Australia leads water reporting initiative. Charter, 82(1), 24–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graneheim, U. H., Lindgren, B. M., & Lundman, B. (2017). Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Education Today, 56, 29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., Brennan, A., & Malpas, J. (2014). New accounts: Towards a reframing of social accounting. Accounting Forum, 38(4), 258–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J., Petty, R., Yongvanich, K., & Ricceri, F. (2004). Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(2), 282–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hąbek, P., & Wolniak, R. (2016). Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: The case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states. Quality and Quantity, 50(1), 399–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazelton, J. (2013). Accounting as a human right: The case of water information. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 26(2), 267–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joubert, P. (2017). An introduction to the philosophy and aims of business research. In D. Van Zyl & P. Venter (Eds.), Economic and management research (pp. 2–30). Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, D., Bond, C. J., Franks, D. M., & Cote, C. (2010). Mining, water and human rights: Making the connection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 1553–1562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodhia, S., & Hess, N. (2014). Sustainability accounting and reporting in the mining industry: Current literature and directions for future research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, I. T. (2015). Research methods and methodology towards knowledge creation in accounting. Contaduría y Administración, 60(1), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, S. M. (2013). Using statistics in social research: A concise approach. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N. K. (2010). Marketing research: An applied orientation (6th ed.). Pearson.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCusker, K., & Gunaydin, S. (2015). Research using qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods and choice based on the research. Perfusion, 30(7), 537–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey & Company. (2009). The global corporate water footprint: Risks, opportunities and management options. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/dotcom/client_service/Sustainability/PDFs/Report_Large_Water_Users.ashx. Accessed 25 June 2022.

  • Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouton, J. (1996). Understanding social research. Van Schaik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuis, J. (2016). Introducing qualitative research. In K. Maree (Ed.), First steps in research (2nd ed., pp. 49–70). Van Schaik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (6th ed.). McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L. D. (2005). Social and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary box. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18(6), 842–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perego, P., Kennedy, S., & Whiteman, G. (2016). A lot of icing but little cake? Taking integrated reporting forward. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plano Clark, V. L., Anderson, N., Wertz, J. A., Zhou, Y., Schumacher, K., & Miaskowski, C. (2015). Conceptualizing longitudinal mixed methods designs: A methodological review of health sciences research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(4), 297–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietersen, J., & Maree, K. (2016). Overview of some of the most popular statistical techniques. In K. Maree (Ed.), First steps in research (2nd ed., pp. 249–304). Van Schaik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajasekar, S., Philominathan, P., & Chinnathambi, V. (2006). Research methodology. https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0601009. Accessed 2 January 2019.

  • Ryan, B., Scapens, R. W., & Theobald, M. (2002). Research method and methodology in finance and accounting (2nd ed.). Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scotland, J. (2012). Exploring the philosophical underpinnings of research: Relating ontology and epistemology to the methodology and methods of the scientific, interpretive, and critical research paradigms. English Language Teaching, 5(9), 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (7th ed.). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semmens, J., Bras, B., & Guldberg, T. (2013). Vehicle manufacturing water use and consumption: An analysis based on data in automotive manufacturers’ sustainability reports. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19(1), 246–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (2017). Research methods in accounting (4th ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M., & Taffler, R. J. (2000). The chairman’s statement: A content analysis of discretionary narrative disclosures. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 13(5), 624–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, N., & Northcott, D. (2007). Content analysis in accounting research: The practical challenges. Australian Accounting Review, 17(3), 12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewari, D. D. (2009). A detailed analysis of evolution of water rights in South Africa: An account of three and a half centuries from 1652 AD to present. Water SA, 35(5), 693–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Water Footprint Network. (2015). Annual Report 2015. https://waterfootprint.org/media/downloads/Water_Footprint_Network_Annual_Report_2015.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2022.

  • Weber, O., & Hogberg-Saunders, G. (2018). Water management and corporate social performance in the food and beverage industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 963–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (2014). Essentials of business research: A guide to doing your research project (2nd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2015). Global risks 2015 (10th ed.). World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., & Creswell, J. (2013). The use of “mixing” procedure of mixed methods in health services research. Medical Care, 51(8), 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure Statement

This paper is derived from the following PhD thesis: Botha, M. J. (2019). Develo** a water disclosure index for the food, beverage, and tobacco industry: An integrative perspective (PhD thesis). North-West University, South Africa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Management Cybernetics Research Entity (School of Accounting Sciences), North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

    Merwe Oberholzer, Martin Botha & Sanlie Middelberg

Authors
  1. Merwe Oberholzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Botha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sanlie Middelberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanlie Middelberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Management Cybernetics Research Entity, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

    Pieter W. Buys

  2. Management Cybernetics Research Entity, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

    Merwe Oberholzer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oberholzer, M., Botha, M., Middelberg, S. (2023). Develo** a Water Disclosure Index: An Integrative Perspective. In: Buys, P.W., Oberholzer, M. (eds) Business Research . Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9479-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation