Memory Hacking: Remembering, Storytelling, and Unreliable Narrators in Julian Barnes’ The Sense of an Ending and The Only Story

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Memory Made, Hacked, and Outsourced
  • 131 Accesses

Abstract

In his 2011 NPR interview, Barnes questions the reliability of memory: “Is our life our life or is it merely the story we’ve told ourselves about our life? To what extent do we clearly remember recorded things? And to what extent is that self-delusion?” When we remember, we tend to come up with a convenient and coherent story, and thus there is a difference between what we call our life and what we call our memory. Barnes once poetically puts it, “[t]he past is autobiographical fiction pretending to be a parliamentary report” (Flaubert’s Parrot 101). For Julian Barnes, remembering is storytelling; when we remember, we are all unreliable narrators.

Part of the content of this chapter is the research output of my research project “Ways of Seeing, Remembering, and Forgetting in the 21st Century: Unreliable Narrators and Narrative Paradox in Julian Barnes’ and Ian McEwan’s Novels,” generously funded by the National Science and Technology Council in Taiwan from May 2017 to April 2018 [MOST106-2410-H-038-002].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is how Shaw explains the process of memory hacking in PBS’ documentary Memory Hackers.

  2. 2.

    If verbalization complicates and overshadows memory, does that mean we can keep our memory “pure” without words? But what exactly can we do with memory without language? In the first chapter in his book Pieces of Light, Charles Fernyhough has an epiphany when his son asked if he remembers his first fishing experience—at that moment he realizes since he has never been asked this question before, he has “never had to come up with a corresponding memory” (2). A memory comes into existence simply because we talk about it, or we are asked to recall. Can we call it a memory if we do not know what it is (through language)? Can memory exist without words? These are significant questions worth further exploration.

  3. 3.

    See Dan Shen, “Unreliability” The Living Handbook of Narratology. Ed. Peter Huhn. Hamburg: Hamburg UP. 27 June 2011.

  4. 4.

    In The Noise of Time, Barnes refers to the Russian Shostakovich’s first-hand materials and discovers that there are traces of editing and deleting. He calls him “a multiple narrator” (200).

Works Cited

  • Barnes, Julian. Flaubert’s Parrot. London: Picador, [1984] 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Nothing to be Frightened of. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Sense of an Ending. New York: Vintage, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Interview. “Speak, Memory: ‘An Ending’ That Uncovers The Past.” NPR. November 19, 2011. Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Noise of Time. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, Wayne C. The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago: U of Chicago P. [1961] 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Alex. “Vanishing Point.” New Statesman 147.5403 (2018): 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, Martin A. “Memory and Self.” Journal of Memory and Language 53 (2005): 594–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dezelar-Tiedman, Christine. “The Only Story.” Library Journal 143.7 (2018): 58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eakin, Paul John. How Our Lives Become Stories: Making Selves. Ithaca, NY/London: Cornell UP, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernyhough, Charles. Pieces of Light: How the New Science of Memory Illuminates the Stories We Tell About Ourselves. New York: Harper Perennial, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, Thomas C. How to Read Novels like a Professor. London: HarperCollins, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Scott. “Why Eyewitnesses Get It Wrong.” TED. 2012. Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guignery, Vanessa. “Julian Barnes.” Richard Bradford ed. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Contemporary British and Irish Literature. Volume I. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons, 2021. 149–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, Faye. “Closeness Through Unreliability: Sympathy, Empathy, and Ethics in Narrative Communication.” Narrative 26.2 (2018): 125–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishiguro, Kazuo. “Kazuo Ishiguro Webchat—As It Happened. The Guardian. January 20, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel, and Jason Riis. “Living, and Thinking about It: Two Perspectives on Life.” Felicia A. Huppert, Nick Baylis, and Barry Keverne eds. The Science of Well-Being. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, Elizabeth. “How Reliable Is Your Memory?” TED. 23 September 2013. Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Interview. “Elizabeth Loftus: How Can Our Memories Be Manipulated?” NPR. October 13, 2017. Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell T, and Leigh Thompson. “A Theory of Temporal Adjustments of the Evaluation of Events: Rosy Prospection & Rosy Retrospection.” Stubbart C, Porac J, Meindl J, Eds. Advances in Managerial Cognition and Organizational Information-processing. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 1994. 85–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nünning, Ansgar. “Reconceptualizing Unreliable Narration: Synthesizing Cognitive and Rhetorical Approaches.” J. Phelan and P. J. Rabinowitz, eds. A Companion to Narrative Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005. 89–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nünning, Vera, ed. Unreliable Narration and Trustworthiness: Intermedial and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, James. Living to Tell About It: A Rhetoric and Ethics of Character Narration. Cornell UP, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Estranging Unreliability, Bonding Unreliability, and the Ethics of Lolita.” Narrative 15.2 (May 2007): 222–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Julia. The Memory Illusion: Remembering, Forgetting, and the Science of False Memory. London: Random House, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Dan. “Unreliability.” Peter Huhn, ed. The Living Handbook of Narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg UP. 27 June 2011. Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Emily Esfahani. “The Two Kinds of Stories We Tell About Ourselves.” TED. January 12, 2017. Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • “The Only Story.” Kirkus Reviews 86.4 (2018): 239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallen, James Ramsey. “The Evils of Banality: Shallowness, Self-realization, and Closure in Julian Barnes’s The Sense of an Ending and Oscar Wilde’s De Profundis.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 58.4 (2017): 325–39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chia-Chieh Mavis Tseng .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tseng, CC.M. (2023). Memory Hacking: Remembering, Storytelling, and Unreliable Narrators in Julian Barnes’ The Sense of an Ending and The Only Story. In: Memory Made, Hacked, and Outsourced. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9251-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation