Abstract
The seismic dynamic response analysis of slope engineering is an important part of the framework of slope seismic performance design and evaluation, as proposed in Chap. 3, which is developed upon determining the seismic ground motion excitation of the slope engineering site. Slope seismic response analysis methods can generally be divided into the quasi-static method, response spectrum method, nonlinear dynamic time-history analysis method, and large deformation analysis method. Under seismic dynamic action, the large deformation analysis method can well represent the dynamic disaster process caused by impact failure after slope instability. These methods can also be integrated to describe the entire evolution process of the slope seismic performance state. The full process analysis of slopes under seismic dynamic action can be realized by integrating the large deformation analysis under seismic dynamic action from plastic finite deformation to crack occurrence and development, and ultimately to the final unstable flow.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Biot MA (1941) A mechanical analyzer for the prediction of earthquake stresses. Bull Seismol Soc Am 31(2):151–171
Bray JD, Travasarou T (2007) Simplified procedure for estimating earthquake-induced deviatoric slope displacements. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(4):381–392
Chopra AK, Goel RK (1999) Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF systems. Report No. PEER1999/02. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA
Fajfar P, Fischinger M (1990) Earthquake design spectra considering duration of ground motion. Paper presented at the proceedings 2nd US national conference on earthquake engineering
Granger CW, Andersen AP (1979) An introduction to bilinear time series models. J Am Stat Assoc 74(368):927
Head JD, Zerner MC (1985) A Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno optimization procedure for molecular geometries. Chem Phys Lett 122(3):264–270
Housner GW (1941) Calculating the response of an oscillator to arbitrary ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 31(2):143–149
Hu YX (1988) Earthquake engineering. Seismological Press, Bei**g
Makdisi FI, Seed HB (1978) Simplified procedure for estimating dam and embankment earthquake-induced deformations. J Geotech Eng Div-ASCE 104(7):849–867
Martin PP, Boltonseed H (1983) One-dimensional dynamic ground response analyses. Int J Rock Mech 20(1):A9–A9
Newmark NM (1965) Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Géotechnique 15(2):139–160
Newmark N (1979) Earthquake resistant design and ATC provisions. Paper presented at the proceedings, 3rd WCEE
Ramberg W, Osgood WR (1943) Description of stress-strain curves by three parameters. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington, D.C.
Shi G (1991) Manifold method of material analysis[C]//Transactions of the 9th army conference on applied mathematics and computing. Minneapolis, USA
Terzaghi (1950) Mechanisms of landslide. Eng Geol
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Huang, Y., **ong, M., Hu, H. (2023). Deterministic Analysis Methods for Slope Seismic Dynamic Response. In: Guidelines for Probabilistic Performance-Based Seismic Design and Assessment of Slope Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9183-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9183-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9182-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9183-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)