SpringerLink
Log in

Non-human Agency in International Students’ Learning Realities: A Choreography of Actor-Network Theory and Rhizomes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rhizome Metaphor

  • 190 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores international students’ informal learning experiences through the lenses of Deleuze & Guatarri’s rhizome philosophy and Actor-Network Theory (ANT). Reflections upon the principles of the rhizome as well as ANT ontologically symmetrical materialism are examined in light of empirical data. This analytical effort seeks to illuminate how learning is non-linearly negotiated by a series of surprising actors, coming into being as an effect of a non-essentialist set of relations. Focusing on theoretical affinity rather than divergence, the creative dialogue established between ANT and the rhizome philosophy gives space for a “choreography” of learning as a relational performance, which is enacted through international students’ practices, and objects that shift from being seemingly irrelevant to becoming matters of controversy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    A “matter of fact” is the fact that achieved ontological security, whereas a “matter of concern” is the fact that has its ontological security challenged (Latour, 2005).

References

  • Fenwick, T. (2010). (un)Doing standards in education with actor-network theory. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (1999). Anti-Latour. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 30(1), 81–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulter, J. (2015). Parables of the posthuman: digital realities, gaming and the player experience. Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, S. (2015). Human and nonhuman agency in Deleuze. In J. Roffe & H. Stark (Eds.), Deleuze and the non/human (pp. 60–78). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, B. (2006). Student perceptions of diversity on a college campus: Scratching the surface to find more. Intercultural Education, 17(3), 311–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, I. (2014). Schizoanalysis of the pedagogy of the oppressed. In M. Carlin & J. Wallin (Eds.), Deleuze & Guattari, politics and education: For a people-yet-to-come (pp. 1–14). Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge (pp. 1–29). Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility strategies. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination (pp. 132–161). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macrostructure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In: K. Knorr-Cetina, & A. Cicourel, A. (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies (pp. 277–303). Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, M. (2014). Amputating the state: Autonomy and la Universidad de la tierra. In M. Carlin & J. Wallin (Eds.), Deleuze & Guattari, politics and education: For a people-yet-to-come (pp. 163–180). Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caroni, P., Chowdhury, A., & Lahr, M. (2014). Synapse rearrangements upon learning: From divergent-sparse connectivity to dedicated sub-circuits. Trends in Neuroscience, 37(10), 604–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, J., & Slife, B. (2009). Research ethics in the postmodern context. In D. Mertens & P. Ginsberg (Eds.), The handbook of social research ethics (pp. 23–38). Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, V., & Montgomery, C. (2014). Challenging conceptions of western higher education and promoting graduates as global citizens. Higher Education Quarterly, 68(1), 28–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. (2014). Inter-collapse…Education nomadology for a future generation. In M. Carlin & J. Wallin (Eds.), Deleuze & Guattari, politics and education: For a people-yet-to-come (pp. 77–94). Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H., & Yearley, S. (1992). Epistemological chicken. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 301–326). The University Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degenais, D., Fodor, A., Schulze, E., & Toohey, K. (2013). Charting new directions: The potential of actor-network theory for analyzing children’s videomaking. Language and Literacy, 15(1), 93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, K. (2005). On the ontology of networks. Communication and Critical/cultural Studies, 2(4), 305–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2013). Networks of knowledge, matters of learning, and criticality in higher education. Higher Education, 67(1), 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T., & Landri, P. (2012). Materialities, textures and pedagogies: Socio-material assemblages in education. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 20(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2012). Researching education through Actor Network Theory. Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (2008). The “banking” concept of education. In D. Bartholomae & A. Petrosky (Eds.), Ways of reading (pp. 242–254). Bedford- St. Martin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, N. (2004). RhizomANTically becoming-cyborg: Performing posthuman pedagogies. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(3), 253–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guattari, F. (1995). Chaosmosis: An ethico-aesthetic paradigm. Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guattari, F. (2000). The three ecologies. The Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hager, P., & Halliday, J. (2006). Recovering informal learning: Wisdom, judgement and community. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1994). A Game of cat’s cradle: Science studies, feminist theory, cultural studies, Configurations: A Journal of Literature. Science, and Technology, 2(1), 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_witness@second_millennium.femaleman© meets oncomouse™: Feminism and technoscience. Journal of the History of Biology, 30(3), 494–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S. (2014). Multiple bodies, actants, and a composition classroom: Actor-network theory in practice. Rhetoric Review, 33(4), 421–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishai, A., Ungerleider, L. G., Martin, A., & Haxby, J. V. (2000). The representation of objects in the human occipital and temporal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(2), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, C. (2020). Is actant-rhizome ontology a more appropriate term for ANT? In A. Blok, I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, A. (2018). Assembling the actors: Exploring the challenges of ‘system leadership’ in education through actor-network theory. Journal of Education Policy, 33(6), 778–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. (2010). Transnational academic mobility, knowledge, and identity capital. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(5), 577–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuby, C. (2017). Why a paradigm shift of ‘more than human ontologies’ is needed: Putting to work poststructural and posthuman theories in writers’ studio. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(9), 877–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation—philosophy, sociology, genealogy. Common Knowledge, 3(2), 29–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999a). On recalling ANT. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor-network theory and after (pp. 15–25). Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999b). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2000). When things strike back: A possible contribution of ‘science studies’ to the social sciences. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1987). Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion. In W. Bijker, T. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 111–134). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2008). Actor network theory and material semiotics. In B. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 141–158). Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J., & Mol, A. (1995). Notes on materialitiy and sociality. The Sociological Review, 43(2), 274–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J., & Singleton, V. (2013). ANT and politics: Working in and on the world. Qualitative Sociology, 36(4), 485–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N., & Brown, S. (1994). Otherness and the actor-network. American Behaviour Scientist, 37(6), 772–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansilla, V., & Gardner, H. (2007). From teaching globalization to nurturing global consciousness. In M. Suárez-Orozco (Ed.), Learning in the global era: International perspectives on globalization and education (pp. 47–66). University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy, D. (2012). Affective assemblages: Body matters in the pedagogic practices of contemporary school classrooms. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 20(1), 9–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munday, I. (2012). Roots and rhizomes: Some reflections on contemporary pedagogy. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 46(1), 42–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, M. T., & Tanner, K. D. (2017). Teaching as brain changing: Exploring connections between neuroscience and innovative teaching. CBE life sciences education, 16(2), fe2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimpiläinen, S. (2015). Multiple enactments of method, divergent hinterlands and production of multiple realities in educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28(2), 137–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomão Filho, A., & Kamp, A. (2019). Performing mundane materiality: Actor-network theory, global student mobility and a (re)formation of social capital. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics in Education, 40(1), 122–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidgen, H. (2015). Bruno Latour in pieces: An intellectual biography. Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stier, J. (2006). Internationalisation, intercultural communication and intercultural competence. Journal of Intercultural Communication, Issue, 11, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Friedrich-Alexander University, Innovation in Learning Institute, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany

    Alfredo Salomão Filho & Tanja Tillmanns

Authors
  1. Alfredo Salomão Filho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tanja Tillmanns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfredo Salomão Filho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia

    Myint Swe Khine

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Salomão Filho, A., Tillmanns, T. (2023). Non-human Agency in International Students’ Learning Realities: A Choreography of Actor-Network Theory and Rhizomes. In: Khine, M.S. (eds) Rhizome Metaphor. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9056-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9056-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9055-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9056-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation