Exploring Rhizomatic Thinking in Clinical Reasoning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rhizome Metaphor
  • 185 Accesses

Abstract

Mental models of health and illness used during clinical practice are predominantly based on reductionism and mechanistic explanations. Systems thinking offers a more holistic conceptualization by viewing the human body to consist of several closely linked organ systems, constantly interacting with each other and embedded in, and ‘open’ to, the external environment. Operationalizing this view to clinical reasoning at the bedside requires networked thinking, concept maps, and tools such as Clinical Reasoning Map (CRM). These are diagrammatic methods that explicitly depict the links across multiple nodes such as diseases, disorders, clinical features, and pathogenetic mechanisms. Systems thinking could be extended to rhizomatic thinking where a metaphor of the rhizome is applied to view complex clinical scenarios. It helps to deepen the understanding of the interconnected nature of cases and the multiple pathogenic pathways, generate differential diagnoses, and predict future prognostic pathways. In the case of planning and providing care, rhizomatic thinking will shift emphasis from a biomedical model to include the social systems, ecosystems, and the built environment. It adds to the growing corpus of novel complex thinking such as whole systems thinking and synergetics, described by Edgar Morin. It is a novel approach to clinical practice, clinical reasoning and its pedagogy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. Springer Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra F. & Luisi, P. L. (2016). The systems view of life (A Unifying Vision) Cambridge University Press; 1st edition (August 1, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombat, A. P. (1991). A thousand trails to work with Deleuze. SubStance, 20, 10–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas-Jones, R. C., & Sariola, S. (2009). Rhizome yourself : experiencing Deleuze and Guattari from theory to practice. Rhizomes, 19 (Summer). http://www.rhizomes.net/issue19/sariola.html.

  • Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Börner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojević, S., Petersen, A. M., Radicchi, F., Sinatra, R., Uzzi, B., Vespignani, A., Waltman, L., Wang, D., Barabási, A. L. (2018). Science of science. Science. 359(6379), eaao0185. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0185.

  • Jayasinghe, S. (2011). Conceptualising population health: From mechanistic thinking to complexity science. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology., 8, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-8-212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayasinghe, S. (2012). Complexity science to conceptualize health and disease: Is it relevant to clinical medicine. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 87(4), 314–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayasinghe, S. (2016). Describing complex clinical scenarios at the bed-side: Is a systems science approach useful? Exploring a novel diagrammatic approach to facilitate clinical reasoning. BMC Medical Education, 16, 264. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0787-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1980). Mental Models in Cognitive Science. Cognitive Science, 4, 71–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, J. M., & Valles, S. A. (2019). Reflecting on what philosophy of epidemiology is and does, as the field comes into its own: Introduction to the Special Issue on Philosophy of Epidemiology. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02252-3.

  • Kresh, J. Y. (2006). Integrative systems view of life: Perspectives from general systems thinking. In T. S. Deisboeck & J. Y. Kresh (Eds.), Complex systems science in biomedicine (pp. 3–29). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision-making. Harvard Business Review., 85, 68–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saroj Jayasinghe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jayasinghe, S. (2023). Exploring Rhizomatic Thinking in Clinical Reasoning. In: Khine, M.S. (eds) Rhizome Metaphor. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9056-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9056-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9055-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9056-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation